Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Intercept is not a right wing publication. [View all]annavictorious
(934 posts)35. People can link to whatever they want,
but they shouldn't expect to be taken seriously when the only support they have for their increasingly bizarre right wing claims consists of very questionable, melodramatic musings about events long ago written by a bitter burner.
I would have thought that people had learned some lessons after their misplaced reliance on the "blockbuster" WSJ story this week.
If people want to play for the other team, then they need to get out of our dugout.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's running out on your side too. Enjoy it while you can. And Lee Fang is NOT a rwer!
jillan
Jun 2016
#3
It's called push-back. Cut out the shitty attacks and smears on our party's candidate ...
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#5
Thank goodness she does not live in my state. I would be afraid to have someone so hostile be
jillan
Jun 2016
#10
Many members of the Democratic party would like to influence the Democratic party platform
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#55
It's an attempt to justify attacks and smears. This shit stops on June 16th.
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#41
Ignore them on this site...and they are not posted so they can be refuted but as an attack
Demsrule86
Jun 2016
#73
Read the update, Nanc. This has zero to do with Clinton's 2008 PAC. Your later response tells me
floriduck
Jun 2016
#46
So sorry Jackie. But my reply was definitely directed at you, not Nancy. Hope you found the
floriduck
Jun 2016
#78
Lee Fang is one of the most progressive journalists out there. How can anyone call him a RWer?
jillan
Jun 2016
#2
As I understand it, ANY criticism of Hillary is a "right wing smear" and ANY site that
djean111
Jun 2016
#12
Greenwald? Really??? I don't always agree with him but how can any true Democrat not appreciate
jillan
Jun 2016
#14
Any more, for myself, "they" have moved to the right; I have not and will not. n/t
djean111
Jun 2016
#31
I find it somewhat amusing that your chosen link went to "Unofficial Sources"
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#13
Nope. Make sure you read the child soldier article I was trying to link to. See my update.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#47
Thank you for misinterpreting what I said.. That seems to be the m.o. of you and your cohorts.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#59
Whether or not someone has been a Democrat since Thomas Jefferson's days is of no moment.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#62
It has nothing to do with my approval or disapproval. I have no delusions of grandeur.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#64
For Hillary Clinton to campaign, "There will be no waivers of the Child Soldier Protection Act"
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#66
Pretty soon we'll be allowed to only link to articles in Homes & Gardens and Car and Driver.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2016
#26
Attacks from the left which do nothing but help Trump should also be banned. You should delete this.
Demsrule86
Jun 2016
#71
Relax 86. I am bringing up news about the Democratic presumptive nominee. She's not my choice
floriduck
Jun 2016
#77
Youll have this place all to yourself, come June 16th. Until then, I have just as much right to
floriduck
Jun 2016
#85
After Thursday, any publication that publishes any criticism of Hillary, no matter how mild ...
Scuba
Jun 2016
#84
But that doesn't mean people hav e to stop posting material from those sources.
CorkySt.Clair
Jun 2016
#88