2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: New Hillary Scandal Checks All the Boxes on the Clinton Controversy Bingo Card [View all]samson212
(83 posts)I really didn't mean to be misleading. You posted a list of people who are on the IAB, and I felt you misrepresented the composition. I didn't Google everyone on the list either, though I think you probably should have done that work in the first place, before trying to back up obviously false conclusions.
I feel it's apparent that there is impropriety here, but I guess I'm not gonna be able to convince you. As for quid pro quo, it's very difficult in a case like this (as is mentioned in the OP and the linked article) to demonstrate that an exchange took place. However, it's pretty clear that Mr. Fernando stood to benefit from access and information, and didn't have the qualifications to sit on the board. You can take that however you like.
PS. "you are being misleading about me being misleading", based on my doing further research, is some serious olympic-level mental gymnastics. I give it an 8.7.
[hr]
[div style="text-align:center; color:blue; font-weight: bold"]You are wrong. You should admit it.[br]Then you'll be right about having been wrong.
[hr]