Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
86. This is one that posted yesterday "let bygones be bygones"
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:00 PM
Jun 2016

I replied that it could not happen because poster could not resist posting their hateful vitriol. Then I called them a hateful person and got a hide.


But, like I said- they can not resist.

implies, apparent, could have, refused. yep something doesnt quite add up. charges with NO proof nt msongs Jun 2016 #1
The Sec. of State CANNOT authorize drone strikes!!! AllTooEasy Jun 2016 #56
Newsflash..... tabasco Jun 2016 #61
Under Sec. Clinton, State became a drone targeting decision-maker. DOS also became a top spy leveymg Jun 2016 #97
To get the real answer... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #2
"4 legs good 2 legs better" NWCorona Jun 2016 #10
Yessss... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #15
Orwell was ahead of his time! NWCorona Jun 2016 #19
That is definitely playing out... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #30
"Some animals are more equal than others." leveymg Jun 2016 #100
I guess you have failed to notice that there is something truly DURHAM D Jun 2016 #3
Maybe the OP can think about more than one thing a day. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #5
Constant repeat of the same drivel isn't thinking. nt DURHAM D Jun 2016 #7
Shouldn't you be focussing all of your attention on the "truly more important going on today?" Gore1FL Jun 2016 #9
This! NWCorona Jun 2016 #16
!!! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #18
Why is she a hypocrite? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #26
No she replied to the thread as being too unimportant to exist and then kept posting in it Gore1FL Jun 2016 #29
If a person is willing to vote for a candidate that has questionable practices..... peace13 Jun 2016 #102
It shows what some folks priorities are... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #25
Some people can think about more than one thing in a day. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #32
Now if she is like my sister the answer would be simple. She jwirr Jun 2016 #4
Even your sister can use a land phone? Yes? We know Hillary uses her fax. leveymg Jun 2016 #23
Yes my sis can and does use a land phone. jwirr Jun 2016 #36
Then, she could send and receive classified information at home over a gov't issued phone. leveymg Jun 2016 #42
Point taken. And I also would like to know why Hillary did jwirr Jun 2016 #54
Jury Results Gore1FL Jun 2016 #6
You squeaked by this time. Have to agree with #7 kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #11
It's more than our team vs theirs. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #13
Please see Post 12. Thank you in advance. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #17
I saw it. You called out a DUer. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #24
Where? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #38
The one you directed me to. Please quit shitting on DU. Shitting on DU makes DU suck. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #40
I'm tired of having this board look like a right wing website. I won't say it looks like Free Repub. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #37
As I replied in post 13... Gore1FL Jun 2016 #44
So the WSJ is right wing too? panader0 Jun 2016 #28
You mean the Rupert Murdoch- owned newspaper that is known to be ultra conservative? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #55
That would be the same Murdoch who held a fundraiser for Hillary? 2cannan Jun 2016 #68
Priceless!!! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #21
I really don't care why. Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #8
Who is the "she" demanding congratulations??? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #22
I think Warren is speaking of Trump n/t TexasBushwhacker Jun 2016 #58
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #12
I'm pretty sure there are a few more people excited... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #27
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #33
You are really being uncivil on this thread. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #39
It's hard for some to let go. NWCorona Jun 2016 #43
It's weird that people think the declared presumptive Dem nominee is so fragile Gore1FL Jun 2016 #46
I have a feeling that the purge will be regretted in due time. NWCorona Jun 2016 #49
I've been around since 2001. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #63
This is one that posted yesterday "let bygones be bygones" notadmblnd Jun 2016 #86
I believe this post was on target.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #45
Gee... I go away for a little while and I'm not even missed! MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #72
This shit doesn't help one bit Arazi Jun 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author Duval Jun 2016 #14
It seems to me that her refusal to use secure systems implies intent. panader0 Jun 2016 #20
Legally, one doesn't have to show more than "gross negligence." That fits the facts here. leveymg Jun 2016 #31
^^^That^^^ onecaliberal Jun 2016 #34
I think it has something to do with the rolling passwords. NWCorona Jun 2016 #35
That's why one hires aides who have a better memory than the boss. leveymg Jun 2016 #51
Sharing a password would be an immediate offense but I do wonder in her case. NWCorona Jun 2016 #53
3 more days... chillfactor Jun 2016 #41
Echo Chambers are AWESOME! nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #47
If you want to post RW garbage feel free to create a Free Republic account. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #71
Demonstrate the Bias. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #73
You need me to demonstrate the bias for you of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal? Really? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #92
I was hoping you'd demonstrate the bias of the article in question, actually nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #104
Thanks for the threats. leveymg Jun 2016 #98
Calling it unsecure is a judgement call, and... scscholar Jun 2016 #50
Her "experts" and lawyers apparently weren't expert. leveymg Jun 2016 #52
The OpenNet network that state.gov uses was unsecure for classified information BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #66
These TS/SAP drone kill communications should have been sent over the Joint Intel secure system. leveymg Jun 2016 #99
Blackberry phones have survived so long because of their superior security bhikkhu Jun 2016 #57
Is Clintonemail.com her address or is this an attack brand? RogueTrooper Jun 2016 #59
Her email from the context of the OP and an attempt to go there in a web browser to see. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #60
Ancient Alien theorists believe ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #62
You have nothing to say. leveymg Jun 2016 #65
It appears she wanted a communications system that was outside of public purview tabasco Jun 2016 #64
How is that done considering that all her emails were sent to or received from a state.gov account BlueStateLib Jun 2016 #67
Actually many of her staff used personal email accounts and some of them even used clintonemail.com 2cannan Jun 2016 #69
When was the last time you sent a fax? ucrdem Jun 2016 #70
About a month ago. leveymg Jun 2016 #74
There's this new gadget called a smartphone ucrdem Jun 2016 #75
I think that whole apple thing was about setting precedent. NWCorona Jun 2016 #76
Indeed but if that was a load of crap it's hard to take the present hoo-ha seriously. nt ucrdem Jun 2016 #77
That angle I have no problem with. NWCorona Jun 2016 #91
During the first week, HRC demanded a half dozen clones of Obama's phone. leveymg Jun 2016 #78
That may be so but she was the US Secretary of State running her department legally. ucrdem Jun 2016 #79
The Dept's communications ceased to be legal within a week leveymg Jun 2016 #83
"ongoing criminal enterprise" is so OTT it shows the whole thing for what it is, a nothing burger. ucrdem Jun 2016 #85
I knew one of the ladies who wrote those letters. leveymg Jun 2016 #87
Hillary didn't blow up the ME, that's foolish. She may have supported some soft power ops ucrdem Jun 2016 #88
Tell us how you were wrong about her before? leveymg Jun 2016 #89
Not Hill, Bill. For years I believed the Nation line that Bill sold Dems down the river ucrdem Jun 2016 #90
Her server was secure and the WSJ article does not say what you claim it says. annavictorious Jun 2016 #80
The server was intruded several times in the first few months after it was taken over leveymg Jun 2016 #81
And 100's of thousands of federal and military personnel private data was compromised off itsrobert Jun 2016 #94
And do you know what the primary cause of successful breaches are? leveymg Jun 2016 #96
Im sorry but WSJ is just another MFM008 Jun 2016 #82
If you actually read the OP, you'd learn that I'm questioning the WSJ piece leveymg Jun 2016 #84
Sometimes, people need an answer right away itsrobert Jun 2016 #93
You haven't read the article, either. It's a remote. You plug in the phone anywhere there's a jack. leveymg Jun 2016 #95
tick tock.. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #101
"Drip, drip" leveymg Jun 2016 #103
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why did HRC use her unsec...»Reply #86