Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why did HRC use her unsecure Blackberry/Clintonemail.com when she had a secure phone/fax? [View all]peace13
(11,076 posts)102. If a person is willing to vote for a candidate that has questionable practices.....
.....where peace is concerned it shouldn't bother them what others talk about. This constant war, drone killing and global war does nothing but feed attacks like that in Orlando. Clinton has enemies around the globe and we will all pay if we look the other way and let her be selected. As a wise child once said.....worry about yourself!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why did HRC use her unsecure Blackberry/Clintonemail.com when she had a secure phone/fax? [View all]
leveymg
Jun 2016
OP
implies, apparent, could have, refused. yep something doesnt quite add up. charges with NO proof nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#1
Under Sec. Clinton, State became a drone targeting decision-maker. DOS also became a top spy
leveymg
Jun 2016
#97
Shouldn't you be focussing all of your attention on the "truly more important going on today?"
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#9
No she replied to the thread as being too unimportant to exist and then kept posting in it
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#29
If a person is willing to vote for a candidate that has questionable practices.....
peace13
Jun 2016
#102
Then, she could send and receive classified information at home over a gov't issued phone.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#42
The one you directed me to. Please quit shitting on DU. Shitting on DU makes DU suck. nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#40
I'm tired of having this board look like a right wing website. I won't say it looks like Free Repub.
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#37
You mean the Rupert Murdoch- owned newspaper that is known to be ultra conservative?
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#55
It's weird that people think the declared presumptive Dem nominee is so fragile
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#46
Legally, one doesn't have to show more than "gross negligence." That fits the facts here.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#31
You need me to demonstrate the bias for you of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal? Really?
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#92
I was hoping you'd demonstrate the bias of the article in question, actually nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#104
The OpenNet network that state.gov uses was unsecure for classified information
BlueStateLib
Jun 2016
#66
These TS/SAP drone kill communications should have been sent over the Joint Intel secure system.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#99
Her email from the context of the OP and an attempt to go there in a web browser to see. nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#60
It appears she wanted a communications system that was outside of public purview
tabasco
Jun 2016
#64
How is that done considering that all her emails were sent to or received from a state.gov account
BlueStateLib
Jun 2016
#67
Actually many of her staff used personal email accounts and some of them even used clintonemail.com
2cannan
Jun 2016
#69
Indeed but if that was a load of crap it's hard to take the present hoo-ha seriously. nt
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#77
That may be so but she was the US Secretary of State running her department legally.
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#79
"ongoing criminal enterprise" is so OTT it shows the whole thing for what it is, a nothing burger.
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#85
Hillary didn't blow up the ME, that's foolish. She may have supported some soft power ops
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#88
Not Hill, Bill. For years I believed the Nation line that Bill sold Dems down the river
ucrdem
Jun 2016
#90
Her server was secure and the WSJ article does not say what you claim it says.
annavictorious
Jun 2016
#80
The server was intruded several times in the first few months after it was taken over
leveymg
Jun 2016
#81
And 100's of thousands of federal and military personnel private data was compromised off
itsrobert
Jun 2016
#94