Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Intercept is not a right wing publication. [View all]guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)86. Your post "assumes" that you can determine my motivation.
If you wish to research what I have posted since becoming a member, you will see that I have never advocated voting for anyone but a Democrat for national office.
And your post also seems to totally miss the point I am making.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's running out on your side too. Enjoy it while you can. And Lee Fang is NOT a rwer!
jillan
Jun 2016
#3
It's called push-back. Cut out the shitty attacks and smears on our party's candidate ...
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#5
Thank goodness she does not live in my state. I would be afraid to have someone so hostile be
jillan
Jun 2016
#10
Many members of the Democratic party would like to influence the Democratic party platform
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#55
It's an attempt to justify attacks and smears. This shit stops on June 16th.
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#41
Ignore them on this site...and they are not posted so they can be refuted but as an attack
Demsrule86
Jun 2016
#73
Read the update, Nanc. This has zero to do with Clinton's 2008 PAC. Your later response tells me
floriduck
Jun 2016
#46
So sorry Jackie. But my reply was definitely directed at you, not Nancy. Hope you found the
floriduck
Jun 2016
#78
Lee Fang is one of the most progressive journalists out there. How can anyone call him a RWer?
jillan
Jun 2016
#2
As I understand it, ANY criticism of Hillary is a "right wing smear" and ANY site that
djean111
Jun 2016
#12
Greenwald? Really??? I don't always agree with him but how can any true Democrat not appreciate
jillan
Jun 2016
#14
Any more, for myself, "they" have moved to the right; I have not and will not. n/t
djean111
Jun 2016
#31
I find it somewhat amusing that your chosen link went to "Unofficial Sources"
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#13
Nope. Make sure you read the child soldier article I was trying to link to. See my update.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#47
Thank you for misinterpreting what I said.. That seems to be the m.o. of you and your cohorts.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#59
Whether or not someone has been a Democrat since Thomas Jefferson's days is of no moment.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#62
It has nothing to do with my approval or disapproval. I have no delusions of grandeur.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#64
For Hillary Clinton to campaign, "There will be no waivers of the Child Soldier Protection Act"
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#66
Pretty soon we'll be allowed to only link to articles in Homes & Gardens and Car and Driver.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2016
#26
Attacks from the left which do nothing but help Trump should also be banned. You should delete this.
Demsrule86
Jun 2016
#71
Relax 86. I am bringing up news about the Democratic presumptive nominee. She's not my choice
floriduck
Jun 2016
#77
Youll have this place all to yourself, come June 16th. Until then, I have just as much right to
floriduck
Jun 2016
#85
After Thursday, any publication that publishes any criticism of Hillary, no matter how mild ...
Scuba
Jun 2016
#84
But that doesn't mean people hav e to stop posting material from those sources.
CorkySt.Clair
Jun 2016
#88