Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The state of ".. or bust" [View all]eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)27. So you're voting based on your distain for Hillary supporters?
Interesting statement on what type of person should and should not use social media.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And are those who claim Clinton doesn't need the votes of Sanders' supporters still sticking
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#1
Nah! If they dump Trump she would win by a wider margin as Trump's supporters . . .
brush
Jun 2016
#37
No one has more negatives than Trump. And a 3rd party run would be a disaster for the repugs
brush
Jun 2016
#76
your statistics are a bit misguided. polls are all over the place on Sanders supporters.
Exilednight
Jun 2016
#14
I meant to post 70% not 79%. I will edit my number of Sanders supporters who will vote blue
brush
Jun 2016
#17
According to who? You? Not the case at all. Most demvoters are sensible enough to not want Trump in.
brush
Jun 2016
#75
There was a post here last week on a poll result asking Sanders supporters that very thing.
brush
Jun 2016
#95
it was CBS/WSJ poll and it was NPR that referenced it in a story. The point is
Exilednight
Jun 2016
#59
Actually, Manu have said that. Their attitude had been, screw you, we don't need you anyway. And it
DebDoo
Jun 2016
#23
With the electoral college, it is absolutely binary. Either Trump wins, or Hillary wins.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#9
If you had bothered to read post 11 you would've seen that we aren't including . . .
brush
Jun 2016
#20
Hopefully you won't be voting for him since you know what you are getting and all.
leftofcool
Jun 2016
#47
You're the ones who had to found a separate site because YOU couldn't handle opposing opinions.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#36
A lot of them were/are actual gold star, paying DU members. I'm sure the admins will disagree. nt
Snotcicles
Jun 2016
#21
They are some of the nastiest people ever over there. I wonder how many are here pretending to
qdouble
Jun 2016
#87
Agreed. You cannot say what they're saying and call yourself "progressive" in any way.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#89
That site is filled with rabid hateful crazy people. No respect at all is over there cursing the
qdouble
Jun 2016
#86
I don't think they mind losing folks who are all about calling our first female candidate
JTFrog
Jun 2016
#28
for real lol... DU would be so much better if we had people openly expose their hatred
qdouble
Jun 2016
#43
That place is a sewer...anybody who expresses most of the shit over there isn't really a democrat
qdouble
Jun 2016
#22
It's an echo chamber for a select few who insist that DU is too echo-chambery.
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#55
Why are you asking now? The opposition was never interested in our input before.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#85