2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: No indictment, but how do Democrats deal with this: [View all]missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)Comey has an agenda as well.
The evidence didn't support an indictment, so he decided to take it upon himself to see if he could have her tried in the Court of public opinion.
It is shameful and petty. This is not the way our justice system is supposed to work. Can you imagine what it would be like if law enforcement could just make a pitch to the public every time they decide they want to take someone down but there isn't enough evidence? We can't indict her, but maybe, if we try hard enough, a mob will burn her at the stake. SMH
Comey used "transparency" as a crutch to vilify his target. He provided only the information he saw fit to provide, and didn't bother to make transparent whether similar issues were found with previous Secretaries of State.