Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: No indictment, but how do Democrats deal with this: [View all]anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)274. Oh really
I think you'll find that the secretary of state actually has extensive authority to make determinations about what is or is not classifiable.
As for your argument that it was illegal but not prosecutable, LOL at your claim that they just couldn't figure out a way to do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
279 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm here to discuss politics and the impact different events have on the future chances of our party
Kentonio
Jul 2016
#125
Maybe they should begin by asking why the director of the FBI feels entitled to publicly scold
lapucelle
Jul 2016
#68
I wonder how well that will play with voters. I'm willing to give it my best effort,
silvershadow
Jul 2016
#194
"She has long admitted it was an error, though no bad intentions. Now go investigate Colin Powell."
RBInMaine
Jul 2016
#133
I am not a Republican and I care about the judgement and honesty of all candidates
tk2kewl
Jul 2016
#11
You are dissapointed the indictment fairy isn't real and you are concern trolling.
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#104
You may be surprised but I would guess that most of us look for judgement and honesty
SharonClark
Jul 2016
#139
The desperation in people trying to somehow make this BAD for Hillary to be cleared.
bravenak
Jul 2016
#17
Do you have a comment on Comey's above statement or how democrats ought to address it?
tk2kewl
Jul 2016
#29
EXACTLY. Use it as a lesson learned and a chance to upgrade everyone's policies.
nolabear
Jul 2016
#54
A lot of the government systems/policies seem to be 15-20 years behind. It'd be great if we saw some
Chathamization
Jul 2016
#89
That really is the answer to all of this - spend time/$$ on fixing that, not investigating....
Justice
Jul 2016
#98
Comey said yes. Secret info was shared and compromised. How do democrats address this?
tk2kewl
Jul 2016
#15
Splodey heads are slpoding !!!!! We handle it by laughing at them really loud and often
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#7
By talking about issues that people actually care about. The email fairy is dead.
YouDig
Jul 2016
#8
This will go into the long list of things the Republicans continue to bring up
csziggy
Jul 2016
#111
The head of the FBI just accused our nominee of being extremely careless with classified information
Kentonio
Jul 2016
#19
people who post in a manner consistent with wanting Hillary Clinton to win
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#143
You should share that with your friends who are going out of their way to mock and deride other Dems
Kentonio
Jul 2016
#261
In which case you're going to also have to accept that ideas of how that can be achieved may differ.
Kentonio
Jul 2016
#266
Exactly, and IMHO she will become considerably more popular by dealing with the trust issue.
Kentonio
Jul 2016
#268
give it a rest. cheney and company lied us into war and still won two elections.
samsingh
Jul 2016
#42
Let's Be Honest. You have an agenda which makes this post's objectivity slim to none.
writes3000
Jul 2016
#26
Since the investigation found no evidence of intent, what "consequences" do you imagine? nt
procon
Jul 2016
#81
Because intelligent people don't change errant behavior unless punished, right?
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#93
I think we must wait and see how the Republicans handle it. Of course right off the bat, she will
patricia92243
Jul 2016
#44
Since Trump is in a massive, multi-state fraud lawsuit, I think we're fine.
CrowCityDem
Jul 2016
#56
If you mean Trump University, there's no indictment and probably will be none.
Jim Lane
Jul 2016
#195
Posting on DU doesn't help Republicans or Democrats, regardless of what is posted.
DesMoinesDem
Jul 2016
#94
Will someone tell this loser that Hillary is the official nominee?!? see below
Dawson Leery
Jul 2016
#85
I don't think that's really the part of the statement we should be most concerned about.
hughee99
Jul 2016
#91
The SoS has considerably authority to classify material, but they do not have nearly as much
hughee99
Jul 2016
#275
it's not an admission, it's a former Ken Starr flunky getting in his partisan attack
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#149
If he wanted to get his partisan attack in, why didn't he just recommend prosecution?
hughee99
Jul 2016
#155
I think that statement from Comey is an admission that this particular situation was considered
hughee99
Jul 2016
#157
what part of "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" was ambiguous? nt
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#158
Look up the definition of consequences in the dictionary, it doesn't specifically exclude
hughee99
Jul 2016
#167
The FBI director--a career Republican who worked for Ken freaking Starr at the OIC, said
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#168
I agree. I'm suggesting THIS might be one of those things they can get a little traction on.
hughee99
Jul 2016
#171
except in this instance there are adjectives used to modify the word consequences
DLCWIdem
Jul 2016
#225
Do you feel this gramatacal distinction will prevent the republicans from being able to portray
hughee99
Jul 2016
#226
the casual observer would have to follow a arguement rather than take what is said at face value
DLCWIdem
Jul 2016
#233
Not really, the republicans will claim that Clinton got special treatement and then say that even
hughee99
Jul 2016
#236
Sure, but most of the spin that's put out isn't done in a debate style forum, and the casual
hughee99
Jul 2016
#245
I'm not doing in this all over again, please read #167 and #171 and feel free to argue my points.
hughee99
Jul 2016
#200
I'm sorry if people are disappointed that someone who did not commit a crime
lapucelle
Jul 2016
#213
I agree, but Clinton didn't get 100% clean bill of health, and IMHO Comey provided additional
hughee99
Jul 2016
#232
IMO I read that to mean a person lower on the total pile would be fired or demoted
DLCWIdem
Jul 2016
#220
The State Dept had such an antiquated system that was hacked numerous times....
Historic NY
Jul 2016
#130
You're certainly correct that JPR prioritizes progressive change over getting Democrats elected
Jim Lane
Jul 2016
#278
The perception of wrongdoing is often as damaging is the reality of wrongdoing.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2016
#144
Yeah, the Republicans have been making their living creating bogus perceptions for decades.
JTFrog
Jul 2016
#145
DEMOCRATS will cheer at the failure of another unfounded Republican witchhunt.
baldguy
Jul 2016
#166
Be glad the opponent is an incompetent, somewhat insane, racist, and only a semi sentient
TheKentuckian
Jul 2016
#172
I'm moving on to insisting that all candidates finally show us their taxes!!!!!!
Walk away
Jul 2016
#180