Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Shocker: It's backhanded and wordy to the point of absurdity, but Chomsky just endorsed HRC [View all]MineralMan
(146,281 posts)25. You use the term "a lot."
How large is that "lot?" Any group of any size can be called "a lot." Without actual numbers, "a lot" is meaningless. I guess you mean "many" when you use that term, but "many" is also useless without some actual numbers. 100 people is "many" people, if you're talking about a small group of people. if you're talking about the voting population, even 100,000 is an insignificant number.
So, if I'm underestimating, show me the numbers that make up your "lot."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Shocker: It's backhanded and wordy to the point of absurdity, but Chomsky just endorsed HRC [View all]
cali
Aug 2016
OP
It's definitely not the worst- and I don't think it has much to do with the number of years he's
cali
Aug 2016
#19
Chomsky has shaped the thinking of a generation on the US relationship with the world.
Ken Burch
Aug 2016
#30
Why is it so important for you to declare him politically irrelevant, though?
Ken Burch
Aug 2016
#34
For those in conflict on who to vote for, I can sum it up in three words, The Supreme Court
still_one
Aug 2016
#26