Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(71,464 posts)
22. Actually, I agree.
Thu Aug 11, 2016, 11:15 AM
Aug 2016

Where does this stuff come from...it seems to me to be a sneaky attack on our candidate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hillary doesn't have to give the republicans the time of day liberal N proud Aug 2016 #1
Exactly workinclasszero Aug 2016 #9
The "bargaining phase." sofa king Aug 2016 #2
The "2012 post-mortem" of the RNC was supposed to be "acceptance". DetlefK Aug 2016 #4
I can't write fast enough to keep up! sofa king Aug 2016 #6
Stupid fantasy. Orsino Aug 2016 #3
First Sanders, now the GOP. Shes got no more participation cookies to hand out fellas! bettyellen Aug 2016 #5
Thank You misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #33
The "concessions" to Sanders were within Democratic Party ideals... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #35
I agree with you but was just pointing out the unprecedented nature of losers demanding concessions. bettyellen Aug 2016 #45
Oh, I know and agree, but the media doesn't help... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #46
She wouldn't deal with a terrorist get the red out Aug 2016 #7
#5 is exactly how I feel Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2016 #8
My final question is this Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #19
I have no idea where this is coming from Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2016 #25
Concessions? I think the term is "begging" tinrobot Aug 2016 #10
who exactly is begging Hillary to be nice...link please. nt Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #17
Just replying to the OP's use of the word "concessions" tinrobot Aug 2016 #20
Actually, I agree. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #22
"We'll promise to keep losing if you give in to our demands." Curtland1015 Aug 2016 #11
Give them nothing. VulgarPoet Aug 2016 #12
Republicans can't be trusted. PERIOD. GeorgeGist Aug 2016 #13
The side that loses doesn't get to make demands. (We've been through this already.) NurseJackie Aug 2016 #14
Yes we have Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #16
Amen JustAnotherGen Aug 2016 #36
Yes, and recently, like in 2008....nt Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #47
If only unicorns were real... Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #15
Sounds very unrealistic to me. Our terms are the Senate Hortensis Aug 2016 #18
Why would Clinton want them to dump Trump? LAS14 Aug 2016 #21
It has always been a mistake to trust any republican! fun n serious Aug 2016 #23
Willy Wonka said it best ... NurseJackie Aug 2016 #24
Remember: "Entitlement Reform" is newspeak for BIG CUTS to Social Security and Medicare. LongTomH Aug 2016 #26
#2... GoCubsGo Aug 2016 #27
It will NOT happen, but if it did... Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Else You Are Mad Aug 2016 #29
How about kicking them in the balls while they're down for once? nt Guy Whitey Corngood Aug 2016 #30
She can win without giving them concessions JustAnotherGen Aug 2016 #31
To quote Khan Noonien Singh: Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2016 #32
Chuck Todd peggysue2 Aug 2016 #34
President Obama did much the same and look what it got us SwankyXomb Aug 2016 #37
Yup. Every time Dems extend their hand it gets bit. Curtland1015 Aug 2016 #39
A Supreme Court pick? For-get it. bluestateguy Aug 2016 #38
She should tell them it depends: TXIRISHWOMAN Aug 2016 #40
fuck that shit. mopinko Aug 2016 #41
Ugh. The more I think about this, the angrier I get. We owe them jack shit. Curtland1015 Aug 2016 #42
Nope, but I did see a post on this board that said she needs to "pivot right" Exilednight Aug 2016 #43
Zero F**ks to give are now sold out in both single shipment and auto-delivery. grossproffit Aug 2016 #44
Cllnton needs to take a page from Grant's book: no surrender KingCharlemagne Aug 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Republicans dream of gett...»Reply #22