Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,121 posts)
52. I disagree
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:45 PM
Oct 2016

Washington Post: The FBI had access to these emails for weeks:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-agents-knew-of-clinton-related-emails-weeks-before-director-was-briefed/2016/10/30/657ed266-9eb1-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html?pushid=breaking-news_1477847865&tid=notifi_push_breaking-news

CNN: The FBI had their experts in the Clinton case look these emails over:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/30/politics/clinton-emails-fbi-abedin/index.html

Investigators from the FBI's New York field office who are conducting the Weiner investigation stumbled on the Abedin emails while they were reviewing emails and other communications on the computer, which was considered to belong to Weiner, the officials said. They stopped their work and called in the team of investigators from FBI headquarters who conducted the probe of Clinton's private email server.

Abedin's lawyers didn't respond to requests for comment.

The investigators saw enough of the emails to determine that they appeared pertinent to the previously completed investigation and that they may be emails not previously reviewed.
Because they don't have a warrant specific to Abedin's emails, officials have not been able to further examine them. Justice Department and FBI officials view Abedin as cooperative with the investigation.

FBI officials yet don't know how many of the emails are duplicates of emails they already have reviewed as part of the Clinton email server investigation and whether any of them may contain classified information.

Investigators believe it's likely the newly recovered trove will include emails that were deleted from the Clinton server before the FBI took possession of it as part of that earlier investigation.


That's Washington Post & CNN - not right wing sources.

Comey is financially set in life. He's near the end of his time at the FBI. About the only thing left for him to concern himself with is his legacy. I doubt he wants to go down in history as the jackass who threw the 2016 election.

You could spot check 100 emails in a couple of hours from that laptop and know with reasonable % how many of the 10,000 or so emails reported on that laptop they do not already have and of those, what percentage are work related or potentially classified. Comey did not rise to the top of the FBI on a career of stupidity. I'd also say he was pretty darn fair with Hillary this summer.

I have a feeling Comey knows a lot more about what they've got than he's presently saying because they need a warrant. His career and legacy is on the line. Time will tell. Try not to rush to conclusions here.
no surprise there... chillfactor Oct 2016 #1
The truth is exposed, Comey keeps flailing, he'll keep sinking deeper into a quagmire of shit. NBachers Oct 2016 #2
Comey-Stain IS the "quagmire of shit"! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2016 #77
Couldn't happen to a nicer liar DemonGoddess Oct 2016 #3
Why hasn't that asshole been fired? vlyons Oct 2016 #4
minimum...he should be asked for his resignation.... beachbum bob Oct 2016 #9
Lynch needs to be ordering Comey to get in front of the cameras and clean up his silly mess. RBInMaine Oct 2016 #10
or else "you're fired", which he should be anyway wordpix Oct 2016 #29
I was thinking the same thing. PunksMom Oct 2016 #81
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #5
What kind of logic is this? Hav Oct 2016 #6
He wasn't exactly praised. He was condemned. He had nothing to charge her with. misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #7
Fuck that Cosmocat Oct 2016 #14
His presser was a clusterfuck. I was never thrilled with him. boston bean Oct 2016 #16
Nobody HERE was praising him. Chemisse Oct 2016 #18
Go ahead, let it all hang out. nt JTFrog Oct 2016 #21
Praised by whom? Surely you're not pulling this out of your ass.... nt Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2016 #22
there was no "screw-up" invovled. beachbum bob Oct 2016 #8
Exactly! He needs to be prosecuted!!!! AgadorSparticus Oct 2016 #68
Comey never said the email were or weren't. Wilms Oct 2016 #11
Maybe he didn't intentionally lie, but he has truly and royally fucked up. Totally botched this. RBInMaine Oct 2016 #12
That's fine. There's a lot to point out and argue about him, at best, screwing up. Wilms Oct 2016 #13
WTF? Cosmocat Oct 2016 #15
If they were not sent from Clinton's server, which was a major part of the subject uponit7771 Oct 2016 #20
Your first paragraph is a reasonable argument. Wilms Oct 2016 #23
More bullshit! Making excuses for Comney that you know are lies? He doesn't know the email headers. bettyellen Oct 2016 #41
I made a logical argument based on what information we have. Wilms Oct 2016 #42
Bullshit- he has NOT seen the emails, their headers, nothing. You're making shit up to defend Comey. bettyellen Oct 2016 #43
I'm sure he'll be able to back up why he thinks it's pertinent... Wilms Oct 2016 #44
You're defending him based on a lie that they saw headers. Why carry Trumps water? bettyellen Oct 2016 #45
You are the one not telling the truth. Wilms Oct 2016 #46
Comey did not see "subject line" headers or anything - why lie to cover for him? Why carry water for bettyellen Oct 2016 #47
Do you have a link to support that? Wilms Oct 2016 #48
Comey also sent a letter to the FBI mercuryblues Oct 2016 #53
Oh. I see. Wilms Oct 2016 #56
Yes, you should mercuryblues Oct 2016 #58
But you're stretching. Wilms Oct 2016 #59
the 3rd party mercuryblues Oct 2016 #61
I put forth a basic idea. Wilms Oct 2016 #62
They were not involved mercuryblues Oct 2016 #64
I guess it really is that hard. Wilms Oct 2016 #65
Weiner was/is married to Abedin. Abedin is an aide to Clinton. Guilt by association. duffyduff Oct 2016 #55
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2016 #60
Comey said they had a bearing on the Clinton case they don't Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #26
Oh. "they don't" have "bearing on the Clinton case". Wilms Oct 2016 #28
Definitely... Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #35
Just trying to keep it real. Wilms Oct 2016 #37
It actually would- to be directly related to Clinton- but keep on trucking... bettyellen Oct 2016 #38
Are you agreeing that it could "be directly related to Clinton"?? Wilms Oct 2016 #39
No matter how you Comey and Trump try to spin this- if there is no direct connection to her server bettyellen Oct 2016 #40
No matter your protest, I have put forward a rational set of ideas. Wilms Oct 2016 #63
Ideas excusing Combey based on a fabrication? He never saw the emails and has no idea.... bettyellen Oct 2016 #66
OK. I give up. Wilms Oct 2016 #67
K&R smirkymonkey Oct 2016 #17
The pressure HAS to be kept on Comey, Democrats have done a great job since this broke on Friday, OnDoutside Oct 2016 #19
main issue is, what on the computer relates to the closed investigation that Congress wordpix Oct 2016 #30
Whether there is or not is actually not as important right now because we won't know one way OnDoutside Oct 2016 #49
Yes exactly! There is nothing else more important at this point. anamandujano Oct 2016 #31
Comey couldn't care less if the emails were between Huma and Amazon dalton99 Oct 2016 #24
It is also clear that Comey colluded with Chavez Demsrule86 Oct 2016 #25
Chaffetz is the weasel in the mix. Investigate their emails misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #27
^^Yep!^^ PearliePoo2 Oct 2016 #34
that's a good point but the sheeple will not "get it" if Chaffetz is wordpix Oct 2016 #32
Yes! I think it was Jennifer Granholm on MSNBC that brought this little tidbit up! PearliePoo2 Oct 2016 #33
Jennifer Granholm fan here also. If she's publicly bringing in Chaffetz misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #36
+1 Yep, it's an excellent attack point, and probably factually true as well, which makes it even OnDoutside Oct 2016 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #51
I disagree Jarqui Oct 2016 #52
I disagree DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #69
He may be as you say "wilfully insubordinate and reckless" Jarqui Oct 2016 #70
Irregardless what part of the country thought DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #71
Lynch recused herself after meeting Bill on the tarmac Jarqui Oct 2016 #72
You are watching too much Faux news. DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #74
I don't have cable and cannot watch FOX news. Nor do I commonly visit their site. Jarqui Oct 2016 #75
I am sorry if you thought I was attacking you for DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #82
Evidently, so is Barack Obama Jarqui Oct 2016 #84
What about we won't defend or criticize leads you DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #85
No it is absolutely not merely "a statement of neutrality". Jarqui Oct 2016 #86
Apparently I am not the only one reading into that DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #87
First of all, Jarqui Oct 2016 #88
Again I was alluding to your comment that Comey DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #89
I didn't say for example there was a " (treasure) trove in the e-mails" Jarqui Oct 2016 #91
By the way DLCWIdem Oct 2016 #90
And somewhere in my posts today is my disgust with Comey that he Jarqui Oct 2016 #93
Of course not. duffyduff Oct 2016 #54
Good grief! They don't make October surprises the way they used to. McCamy Taylor Oct 2016 #57
And a former ethics lawyer under GW is filing a burrowowl Oct 2016 #73
He should be fired liberal N proud Oct 2016 #76
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #78
Fuck off, troll. roamer65 Oct 2016 #79
unfortunately it is semantics Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #80
Comey's letter said "in the middle of the election season", NO, it's the END of the election season! OnDoutside Oct 2016 #92
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Comey has royally screwed...»Reply #52