Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,854 posts)

3. I agree

Reply to BlueCaliDem (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 2, 2013, 03:46 PM

Jan 2013

I would also add to anybody upset about the deal not sticking to the $250K threshold: NOTHING short of a constitutional amendment is "permanent" (and constitutional amendments aren't technically permanent either though they are, of course, difficult to repeal once enacted), so once we get another Democratic-controlled Congress (and, hopefully, keep the WH), we can still lower the threshold for taxes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

POLL: the deal,good or not? [View all] jerseyjack Jan 2013 OP

I think we should have held to $ 200,000 and $ 400,000 with the estate tax at $ 3.5 million @ 35% Filibuster Harry Jan 2013 #1

I didn't do the math Control-Z Jan 2013 #4

It was a GREAT RESULT. Perfect? No. But nothing is. BlueCaliDem Jan 2013 #2

I agree Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2013 #3

Personally, I was to the point of wanting to go over the cliff. denverbill Jan 2013 #5

I too was in favor of going over the cliff as well Harmony Blue Jan 2013 #6

Yes please. Myrina Jan 2013 #7

The Reeps were forced to raise taxes riqster Jan 2013 #8

AMT wiped out. Payroll taxes restored. DevonRex Jan 2013 #9

It's okay I guess, but we'll really see in three months. nt geek tragedy Jan 2013 #10