Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

TroyD

(4,551 posts)

1. Remote areas

Reply to Reter (Original post)

Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:14 PM

Nov 2014

Harder to count the remote areas, apparently.

But the vote is coming in slowly in lots of states actually.

The counting has been going slowly in Virginia, Colorado & New Hampshire, as well as Connecticut, which is why it has taken so long for Warner, Hickenlooper and Malloy to be elected, and for Brown to finally realize that Shaheen won.

And California seems to only be at 60% in, although Brown won by a 60-40 margin, so the result was known a long time ago (although there are some House races in question).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What's up with Alaska? [View all] Reter Nov 2014 OP

Remote areas TroyD Nov 2014 #1

This. Travelman Nov 2014 #4

In this day and age of electronics I was shocked to still see at 1 am that all Connecticut votes Filibuster Harry Nov 2014 #2

I just checked, it say 100.00% reporting Reter Nov 2014 #3

Yes, see my post below. Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #8

Juneau doesn't have any roads coming into it, as an example Recursion Nov 2014 #5

OK, I get that why it takes so much longer in Alaska now Reter Nov 2014 #6

Two weeks, and, yes, we can win, Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #9

Big state, lots of remote precincts, Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #7