Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
11. Not illegal
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jun 2015

I believe it's customary for serving presidents to refuse speaking fees, but their wives have taken in big charitable contributions for ages. I imagine Bill ad Chelsea Clinton will do the same when Hillary becomes president. (Yes, I admit she'll probably win.) I much prefer the Sanders model, which holds to the traditional role of a public servant. I think a former secretary of state should not charge what the market will bear, but only what is reasonable, and should only appear for worthy causes. Yes, the Clintons use their foundation as a political tool. Canadian energy corporations do not give money to US charities because they're worried about American kids getting obese. They give money because they want to be connected to people who can help them, and the Clintons are such people. Is it quid pro quo? Legally, no. I don't like it, but it will pass ethics guidelines, which I would argue are too loose.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»two questions for Hillary...»Reply #11