Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

dsc

(52,152 posts)

9. Her husband's two appointees both voted against it

Reply to kath (Reply #7)

Tue Jul 7, 2015, 07:38 PM

Jul 2015

that is a matter of public record and has been for several years.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why 2016 will be a Supreme Court election [View all] Gothmog Jul 2015 OP

Agree. Very important election. n/t FSogol Jul 2015 #1

It is why sitting out the election because you didnt get exactly who you wanted, will not just randys1 Jul 2015 #2

Even Rick Perry thinks that control of the SCOTUS is an imporant issue Gothmog Jul 2015 #3

MOST IMPORTANT REASON: the opportunity to overturn Citizen's United. Auggie Jul 2015 #4

No way in hell will HRC's corporate and Wall Street donors let her appoint anyone whom they kath Jul 2015 #7

She's on record: From the N.Y. Times, May 19, 2015 ... Auggie Jul 2015 #8

Her husband's two appointees both voted against it dsc Jul 2015 #9

Sanders has a litmus test for Supreme Court appointments. LWolf Jul 2015 #5

So does Hillary Clinton Gothmog Jul 2015 #6

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why 2016 will be a Suprem...»Reply #9