Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)96. The Clintons' voluminous baggage goes back decades & it's documented.
Interesting that the Republicans pushing on the email investigation and missing emails have not, as far as I've seen, mentioned the similarity to the missing Whitewater documents. That was some 20 years ago, so younger posters probably never heard of this, but I have no doubt that GOP oppo research team is drooling to throw this at HRC should she win the primary.
Republicans on the special Senate Whitewater committee released a report from the Federal Bureau of Investigation today showing that the fingerprints of the First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, were found on records discovered in the White House family quarters two years after they were first sought by investigators.
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/05/us/hillary-clinton-s-fingerprints-among-those-found-on-papers.html
Those Whitewater documents had been subpoenaed from HRC and for 2 years she stoutly claimed she had absolutely no idea where they were. Then they were found on a table in the first family's private quarters - just outside the door to HRC's office. And she again disavowed any knowledge of how they got there.
It was so painful and ugly, for me as a Democrat who had worked for Bill's election and even been a guest at his first inauguration, to go through all the years of investigations and embarrassing results thereof. If she's the Dem. nominee, we will all have to go through months and months of rehashing this yet again. Horrifying to contemplate. If the Clintons had come clean and cooperated with the Whitewater investigations, as your post mentions they were recommended to do, Ken Starr would never have gotten around to Monica Lewinsky.
In January 1998, Starr suddenly requested and received permission to expand his investigation again. The new area of inquiry: whether Clinton and his close friend Vernon E. Jordan Jr. encouraged Monica Lewinsky to lie under oath about whether she had an affair with the president. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm
Ted Koppel did a masterful Nightline report on the whole incident. Here's a link to the transcript of Ted Koppel's coverage of this nightmare. HRC is caught in mis-statement after mis-statement after mis-statement and keeps trying to spin and twist her way out of it. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/01301996.html
The Whitewater Lost And Found Records
January 30, 1996
Correspondent: Chris Bury
Anchor: Ted Koppel
Announcer: January 30th, 1996.
TED KOPPEL (VO): The accusation? Obstruction of justice, knowingly withholding subpoenaed documents. The location? A book room on the third floor of the White House, a room in the first family's private quarters. One clue? A White House log handed over today with the names of all the people who might have had access - from Mrs Clinton's chief of staff, to Chelsea Clinton's friends, to dignitaries visiting the President. Tonight, the mystery of the lost and found records.
ANNOUNCER: This is ABC News Nightline. Reporting from Washington, Ted Koppel.
TED KOPPEL: Almost exactly two years ago, a subpoena was issued for some billing records from the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas. These are records that go back about 10 years or so and that would, it was believed, shed some light on how much work attorney Hillary Clinton did on a particular real estate deal, and for whom she did that work. For the better part of these last two years, those records could not be found. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, they turned up earlier this month in the office of a woman named Carolyn Huber. What turned that into a major story is that Ms Huber works at the White House, and that she says she found the billing records in the private quarters of the first family - found them, in fact, last August, right outside Mrs Clinton's private office - didn't know what they were, packed them up, didn't realize what they were until a couple of weeks ago, when she was tidying up her own office. If someone has been deliberately concealing those records, that would be a federal crime. The White House says that a surprisingly large number of people actually had access to the Clintons' private quarters last August We'll tell you more about that later, but we want to use most of our time this evening to put this latest development into context. We begin by taking something both the President and the first lady have said recently.
CHRIS BURY, ABC NEWS (VO): The President and Mrs Clinton complain that the questions keep changing, but the controversies over Whitewater and the Travel Office have stayed alive, in large part, because the answers keep changing, too.
CHRIS BURY (VO): On January 15th, Mrs Clinton told a radio interviewer all documents had been released. Five days later, the White House issued a statement to The New York Times saying that wasn't quite true. On Castle Grande, Hillary Clinton's legal work for a land deal regulators describe as fraudulent: in May 1995 she told the Resolution Trust Corporation, quote, 'I don't believe I knew anything about any of these real estate parcels and projects.' But after billing records showed Hillary Clinton had at least 14 conversations with Seth Ward, the major player in the deal, Mrs Clinton told Barbara Walters she knew the project by another name.
HILLARY CLINTON: ('20/20,' January 19, 1996) And so when I was asked about it last year, I didn't recognize it, I didn't remember it. The billing records show I did not do work for Castle Grande. I did work for something called IDC, which was not related to Castle Grande.
CHRIS BURY (VO): That is not how Susan McDougal, the Clintons' former business partner, remembers it.
SUSAN MCDOUGAL: It was always the same thing. As far as I know, IDC and- and- and Castle Grande were one and the same.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
OP
This issue is about being tech savy;right wing concerns are policy/personality centered
Divernan
Jul 2015
#8
You make so many excellent points and thanks for your discussion of your own experience
karynnj
Jul 2015
#88
I'm trying to wrap my mind around your use of Benghazi, Ambassador Stevens, and Vince Foster.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#49
It's about not reading urgent messages from an Ambassador, no matter where he's stationed.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#86
It is sad how invested they are in this story in the service of a candidate who will never
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#93
I was taught in Civics one of the roles of president is head of his or her party...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#95
If you were in possession of all the information on her server, would you brag about it now...
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#20
Please don't delete the references. Sometimes people need to be reminded. Thank You.
Laser102
Jul 2015
#25
No, in fact the IG's have found classified info in her emails--they were stored in her
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#35
The IG said specifically that the info contained within four of forty emails
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#48
You are simply wrong on the law....and the WSJ has already backed off their article.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#50
The issue I'm discussing is specifically the handling of classified information.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#53
We're just talking past each other. Yes, it matters that classified information
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#58
There are penalties for mishandling classified material, even if it's by
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#70
It's the complete explanation of the NYT story with the original documents in hand.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#74
Does it deal with the Wall Street Journal's reporting that an Inspector
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#75
Bad analogy. Everything at the Manhattan project was classified or secret. Not so with State. nt
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#60
They determined that she should not have had that info on her server--marked or not.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#57
We really need to do something about the <---!!!squirrel!!!---> infestation of DU.
Zorra
Jul 2015
#40
It isn't up to us to show evidence it wasn't hacked. It's up to YOU to show evidence it was.
wyldwolf
Jul 2015
#26
I think Ben Gazzara died a few years ago. What does he have to do with servers and emails?
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#34
Nothing, just like servers and e-mails will ultimately have to do ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#36
A person charged with a crime has to be proven guilty, the person doesn't have to prove their
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#52
And if this was a trial, that would be relevant. But this is a political campaign.
jeff47
Jul 2015
#59
The op contained "Prove it wasn't hacked. SHOW me evidence it wasn't hacked. Prove to me and the
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#61