Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
18. Systemic racism and income inequality do reinforce each other
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:31 AM
Jul 2015

Last edited Mon Jul 27, 2015, 01:08 PM - Edit history (1)

This is a battle that will be fought on two fronts.

On one side, we're working with the ever hidden hand of the status quo. The status quo consists of the most economically and politically-connected individuals. Currently, that means rules for the police, school programs and job opportunities are gamed to improve the lot for a white demographic, because that is the composition of our status quo in America.

This is a no brainer. Even Sandra Bland mentioned it in her video that to be successful, you have to learn to work alongside of the white culture. That means learning how to fit into their culture, at least, if you want to earn an income. And that's how it will be until minorities can make it in great numbers into the status quo equation, where they can make the rules more equal, so they can retain more of their self without being penalized for it.

And that's where the second front comes in. The one where organizations like BLM will make a huge difference. BLM is creating an urgency and building a groundswell that will put minority issues where they need to be for any change to even be considered by the current status quo.

That's the only way that this country has ever made concessions to minorities. And let me tell you, the first Civil Rights movement did a magnificent job, but it was only the beginning. Affirmative Action did a great job to help minorities overcome obstacles that once kept them from gathering the kind of training and experiences that would help them climb the ladder. But I can tell you that once you get up that ladder and take two steps away from any Federally mandated occupation or environment, you'll find yourself in the same backwater hole, where the old style status quo has been allowed to thrive, undeterred by any effort to diversify.

No question that some of those Federal programs need to be updated. Introducing minorities into any small town environment where the system is gamed in favor of white residents is fool-hardy. It's insanity to think that we can offset the existing political networks in these established communities by building multi-family communities on the outskirts of town. The reasoning behind these programs is that multi-family homes are more affordable, hence, minorities will be able to move in and change the political demographics. But that isn't what happens. We are essentially recreating the very segregated style of communities that the Civil Rights movement tried to put an end to.

The only right way to break through, is to raise the economic well being for minorities, so they can afford to move into the high priced gated communities where the power is pooled. But we have to do it in numbers because these communities have further pitfalls to consider.

You can see the edges of social engineering wherever covenant restricted communities are selectively enforcing their documents. Business Associates and cronies are allowed to do whatever they want to do on their property, infringing on the rights of neighbors. To someone who is victimized by the process, it does look like a concerted effort to push you out of the community, because the HOA is reinforcing a hostile atmosphere.

To add to the tumultuous environment, the HOA board members can pile it on by increasing the Association fees. This will not have a negative impact on residents who are connected to one another through the poli-economic networks that small towns are known for. These residents won't even bat an eyelash when those fees keep climbing because the cost can be mitigated through business opportunities that will spring up through their business associations. Everyone else is on their own.

This will be particularly daunting for minorities, wherever racism is an issue.

Those fees become a challenge because they must be paid, or you lose your house. It's simple mathematics. It is a major pitfall to home ownership, especially for minorities who finally make it to the top to discover a society where the rules are unlike any other that they have experienced before. You pay for a dream home, just to discover that you're on the outside of an entitled, insular society. And if you look around, it is not much different any where else.

So you will continue to pay those fees, and unwittingly feed the system, because your house can be sold right from under you if you don't. This will not change until the demographics of a community change, to make it harder for insular societies to set in.

This was all done to give that smug turd Chuck Todd a reason to ask stupid questions. gordianot Jul 2015 #1
two sides of the same coin noiretextatique Jul 2015 #2
strategic divide and conquer by some candidates and their supporters. nt magical thyme Jul 2015 #5
indeed noiretextatique Jul 2015 #23
It has to be a part of the plan/modus operandi Android3.14 Jul 2015 #3
Then we should get united over race. gollygee Jul 2015 #40
divide and conquer magical thyme Jul 2015 #4
Hey…. MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #6
+1 n/t Bonhomme Richard Jul 2015 #7
because it's a wedge issue on which Hillary can get the upper hand Doctor_J Jul 2015 #8
Social Justice is a wedge issue? JoePhilly Jul 2015 #14
there is a group that is making it one Doctor_J Jul 2015 #16
it's much easier for party centrists to focus on identity politics nashville_brook Jul 2015 #20
Your response demonstrates that you still don't get it ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #25
{Sighhh} ... How many times does this need to be said and in how many different ways ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #27
I'm going to tell you .... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #28
Now see? ... There you go ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #32
Here? zappaman Jul 2015 #31
K&R blackspade Jul 2015 #9
It may not be as big a mystery as you describe...but it's certainly complex. Sancho Jul 2015 #10
Cotton and polyester are very distinct things but once those fibers are blended TheKentuckian Jul 2015 #11
bernie called them parallel issues restorefreedom Jul 2015 #12
There is a great deal of overlap, but they are separate gollygee Jul 2015 #13
There is a very long history.... Adrahil Jul 2015 #15
The richest black man in town is still pulled over more often, incarerated more often Sheepshank Jul 2015 #17
I agree artislife Jul 2015 #22
Systemic racism and income inequality do reinforce each other Baitball Blogger Jul 2015 #18
Because it allows marginalization of one of the candidates n/t whatchamacallit Jul 2015 #19
This has been ongoing for several years AgingAmerican Jul 2015 #21
Who benefits from this false dichotomy? Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 #24
Right Wing Dems Teamster Jeff Jul 2015 #29
This tells some of the horrors far too many face AuntPatsy Jul 2015 #26
I invite you to read (re-read) Dr. King's ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #30
He didn't say it in Other America because it's a different speech. jeff47 Jul 2015 #33
Well. I went to the speech that the OP cited ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #35
IMO, he was speaking of the need for both fights. jeff47 Jul 2015 #36
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #37
And whether those previous words were the totality of his plans jeff47 Jul 2015 #38
I think it's significant that earlier in the speech you cited ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #39
Yep, they are two fights. Somewhat complimentary, but two fights. (nt) jeff47 Jul 2015 #42
And, though it cuts against the dominant DU 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #43
We seem to have two pools of people talking past each other. jeff47 Jul 2015 #44
I see it a little differently ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2015 #45
Bernie Sanders and his supporters... malokvale77 Jul 2015 #34
I quit arguing they shouldn't be separated days ago. Just do what is right on both issues. mmonk Jul 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What the heck!? Why are p...»Reply #18