Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

madamesilverspurs

(16,536 posts)

4. Whoa, you grabbed the wrong end of that stick!

Reply to longship (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 25, 2012, 05:10 PM

Jun 2012

Kagan's recusal was absolutely appropriate. The problem is with those justices who have had very cozy interactions with those opposed to health care reform yet claim no need to recuse themselves. Good on Kagan, bad on them. For the record, I did not "tar" Kagan, but I own pre-emptively tarring those other justices. Does that meet with your approval?

-

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is with the wait on the HCR ruling from SCOTUS? [View all] Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 OP

it may simply mean that justices are still editing their opinions onenote Jun 2012 #1

Certain justices are constructing madamesilverspurs Jun 2012 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author longship Jun 2012 #3

Whoa, you grabbed the wrong end of that stick! madamesilverspurs Jun 2012 #4

My bad.. Deleted. Misread your post. longship Jun 2012 #5

Ok, I have theories ... JoePhilly Jun 2012 #6

The wailing and teeth gnashing of wingnuts Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 #7

I select the theory behind closed door #3 flamingdem Jun 2012 #9

They know nobody will be happy.... Wounded Bear Jun 2012 #8