Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JackHughes

(166 posts)
64. Hillary on the Ropes
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 10:26 AM
Aug 2015

It's not by accident that Hillary is on the ropes. It's the result of a sustained political attack -- aided by a credulous and easily manipulated press corps -- by what she accurately dubbed the "vast right-wing conspiracy" over twenty years ago.

When hyper-partisan Republicans' Whitewater investigation hit a dead end it simply morphed into the Lewinsky impeachment investigation. Similarly, the fruitless Benghazi investigations also became open-ended, an inquiry searching desperately for evidence of any wrong-doing by Hillary Clinton, even if it had to be manufactured with half-truths, distortions and, when necessary, outright lies.

Since Republicans struck-out on Benghazi after all their dishonest wailing and garment-rending, they suddenly changed the subject to her emails. Oh my, Clinton had a server in her BATHROOM! The Fox-watching goobers in the GOP base didn't seem to even notice the switcheroo.

After years of this type of sustained character assassination, yes, Hillary Clinton's "trustability" quotient has declined. That was the whole point of the huge investment in time, money and spin by the Republicans.

What's disappointing is how weak the Clinton campaign has been in responding. Where are her surrogates? All the campaign would have to say is that Secretary Clinton didn't want the Republicans sifting through her emails looking for dirt.

Nobody could doubt that sensible position.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've always found her kind of flat Fast Walker 52 Aug 2015 #1
Sounds forced.... RiverLover Aug 2015 #10
Interesting article, but one that will result in screams 1monster Aug 2015 #40
Well, they had better get used to it. RiverLover Aug 2015 #88
Ouch. OUCH!!!! John Poet Aug 2015 #108
Woodward would do or say anything to get back in the spotlight. oasis Aug 2015 #110
Absolutely Roy Rolling Aug 2015 #37
I'm really surprise how so many expected her to suddenly become a good candidate musiclawyer Aug 2015 #114
She does lack polish often getting flustered and gesturing in unflattering ways. CBGLuthier Aug 2015 #2
I've known this for some time. Chan790 Aug 2015 #3
Huh? She won two Senate races. Metric System Aug 2015 #8
Yes..... LovingA2andMI Aug 2015 #11
In the first, her opponent was indicted during the campaign. jeff47 Aug 2015 #28
ah no dsc Aug 2015 #35
Ah, I had a bad source. jeff47 Aug 2015 #41
Moynihan was very popular CanadaexPat Aug 2015 #70
She won two Senate races... in New York? PLEASE. John Poet Aug 2015 #109
Thank you DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #22
You do realize if Bernie wins the nomination he cannot win the general election without Hillary still_one Aug 2015 #63
I'm not specifically for Bernie...I'm explicitly against Hillary. Chan790 Aug 2015 #95
It doesn't matter who the "anyone but Hillary" candidate is. If they get the nomination still_one Aug 2015 #135
I think you're not getting it. Chan790 Aug 2015 #144
well then you will succeed just like Ralph Nader did still_one Aug 2015 #146
Hillary voters are not reading DU. They're hearing Bernie. HappyPlace Aug 2015 #132
You do realize that jumping thing works both ways? Autumn Aug 2015 #145
Absolutely, and I have always maintained that both sides need each other. The reason I put it into still_one Aug 2015 #147
Colbert could kill it with that line in a segment. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #4
I think she's pretty awful. bigwillq Aug 2015 #5
Agree completely n/t MissDeeds Aug 2015 #26
Have my differences in opinion tazkcmo Aug 2015 #27
I will agree she is better than any R bigwillq Aug 2015 #51
ummm hmmmm ericson00 Aug 2015 #6
She's leading due to name recognition. dirtydickcheney Aug 2015 #44
Her favorability is in the toilet and getting worse. bunnies Aug 2015 #60
nobody cares about favorable/unfavorable except nitpickers ericson00 Aug 2015 #62
Are you intentionally missing the point? bunnies Aug 2015 #65
the only numbers that matter is who gets the most votes in the election. ericson00 Aug 2015 #68
That remains to be seen. nt bunnies Aug 2015 #75
Wait.. the votes have been counted? frylock Aug 2015 #97
...and voters. n/t Qutzupalotl Aug 2015 #116
the voters wills are better expressed in trial heats, ericson00 Aug 2015 #117
They remember "I don't trust Candidate A" Qutzupalotl Aug 2015 #118
She's never been a terribly good candidate. Vinca Aug 2015 #7
Probably.... LovingA2andMI Aug 2015 #9
Sanders is no Obama Garrett78 Aug 2015 #13
Normal people see Sanders' positions The Wizard Aug 2015 #19
European Centrist Garrett78 Aug 2015 #33
I agree, and laying that groundwork is no easy feat. sibelian Aug 2015 #72
Sanders is no Obama frylock Aug 2015 #98
He's better. [n/t] Maedhros Aug 2015 #103
word up frylock Aug 2015 #105
Which is why he can't win. Garrett78 Aug 2015 #134
Defeatism. Maedhros Aug 2015 #136
Realism. Garrett78 Aug 2015 #138
People like to forget that she came *thisclose* to winning the primary lunamagica Aug 2015 #29
she came *thisclose* to winning the Primary?? dirtydickcheney Aug 2015 #46
Are you kidding? Edwards dropped out mid-way and the contest was between Hillary and Obama lunamagica Aug 2015 #71
"Obama won thanks to the overwhelming support of AA voters". Obama dominated in rural areas. ieoeja Aug 2015 #67
Obama did a lot of heavy lifting for her campaign artislife Aug 2015 #89
Obama stripped State of its single most important responsibility while she was Secretary. ieoeja Aug 2015 #93
Good points. artislife Aug 2015 #96
really good points, thanks. n/t MBS Aug 2015 #120
She always seems to be the "victim" of something... KoKo Aug 2015 #139
And we are going to see more primary nonsense and date jumping if Bernie takes NH or Iowa... PassingFair Aug 2015 #121
And the Seahawks came *thisclose* to winning the Super Bowl. frylock Aug 2015 #100
Appes and oranges lunamagica Aug 2015 #101
bananas and plantains frylock Aug 2015 #104
No, sorry, apples and oranges. I guess you didn't even read the post, lunamagica Aug 2015 #106
Hillary lost by 1% because Obama coasted towards the end frylock Aug 2015 #111
You are assuming she gets the same number of non-black voters as in 2008 LondonReign2 Aug 2015 #131
Her year was 2004. If she ran then, she'd have run the table. Gore1FL Aug 2015 #12
Gotta agree here. This time, she needed to do the opposite of what she really feels Nay Aug 2015 #21
No, to her credit, she felt she needed to actually serve out the positions she accepted, rather HFRN Aug 2015 #83
Yawn ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #14
Apply a Borris and Natashia accent to this person's posts. Amimnoch Aug 2015 #17
love the simpsons, love Rocky but sorry not a cultist cali Aug 2015 #23
So funny artislife Aug 2015 #90
Jury results Blue_Adept Aug 2015 #107
You know the sad part.. I actually agree with the alerter. Amimnoch Aug 2015 #115
You realize that when you do this you bump the thread, right? jeff47 Aug 2015 #31
I know someone who went to law school TBF Aug 2015 #15
I can see that. n/t demmiblue Aug 2015 #16
I think she'd make a wonderful Supreme Court justice. That's a damn good idea. Nay Aug 2015 #24
Agree on all counts - TBF Aug 2015 #32
I've been saying she's SCOTUS material for years now... Ken Burch Aug 2015 #124
First female president - TBF Aug 2015 #125
Ridiculous SCantiGOP Aug 2015 #18
Sometimes, Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #49
do you expect all Dems to march lockstep behind Hillary? Fast Walker 52 Aug 2015 #119
Not at all, Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #122
well, there was an article in the OP and several people agreed with it. Fast Walker 52 Aug 2015 #140
Because DU is not reality. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #141
Dan Pfeiffer nailed it. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #20
I'm not a Hillary supporter but... potone Aug 2015 #128
So the "not good" candidate got as many votes as the "incredibly good" candidate in 2008, right? brooklynite Aug 2015 #25
That is an excellent point.... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #30
Yes, but given where Obama had to start in the campaign, Vattel Aug 2015 #50
Look at it as a basketball game.. frylock Aug 2015 #102
Republican Light Chasstev365 Aug 2015 #34
maybe? ibegurpard Aug 2015 #36
Hillary is a loser. earthside Aug 2015 #38
Sanders said it best yesterday: Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #39
When that's all you got, that's what you do. NorthCarolina Aug 2015 #73
Do not listen to the video....because what you say is exactly what Sanders says he does. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #74
Ah, but we already *know* that Sanders won't be voting for Hilary, Fred. sibelian Aug 2015 #76
Mind reading from distance is not one of my talents.....lucky for you! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #78
I don't have any troubling with listening, Fred, thanks. sibelian Aug 2015 #79
I'm not about to jump on this bandwagon tblue Aug 2015 #42
Her opponents lack "the skills, message and charisma to derail this train" Rose Siding Aug 2015 #43
OR experience! George II Aug 2015 #80
Hillary is passionless which doesn't mean she would be a bad President. jalan48 Aug 2015 #45
Nope, not at all. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #47
'without Bill’s personality, eloquence or warmth.' --> they nailed it HFRN Aug 2015 #48
What she lacks in personality, eloquence and warmth she makes up with snark, arrogance, and leveymg Aug 2015 #54
yup 'like a cloth' was classic H nt HFRN Aug 2015 #56
The Teflon kid, is what they called him. azmom Aug 2015 #57
If a bunch of Democrats zentrum Aug 2015 #52
She's a mediocre candidate who would be an effective chief executive Proud Public Servant Aug 2015 #53
Kerry ibegurpard Aug 2015 #55
She's nowhere near as bad a campaigner as Kerry (nt) Proud Public Servant Aug 2015 #59
See post #20 DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #85
And maybe WAPO sucks. leftofcool Aug 2015 #58
'anonymous consultant' and all that. Very Fox New-ish. emulatorloo Aug 2015 #61
Hillary on the Ropes JackHughes Aug 2015 #64
I saw her in 2008 and I was shocked at how uninspiring she was on the stump. n/t Dawgs Aug 2015 #66
She wasn't last time JackInGreen Aug 2015 #69
Anonymous sources say.... LOL MaggieD Aug 2015 #77
it doesn't take sources to tell us the obvious. her plunging cali Aug 2015 #82
We've been hearing she is dead in the water.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #84
You guys will just dig up anything in a vain attempt to discredit Clinton and prop up Sanders. George II Aug 2015 #81
it's Chris cilizza who is posted here everyday. cali Aug 2015 #123
Of course you selectively posted some of the most negative paragraphs from the article, not these: George II Aug 2015 #126
It's hooking...hooking...FOUL POST, I mean BALL GitRDun Aug 2015 #86
We all have our opinions...... Uben Aug 2015 #87
Why is it that every time HRC gets called out d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #91
If she presidents like she campaigns, it'll be a long four years for her tularetom Aug 2015 #92
A couple of things, the online anti-Clinton campaign has worked ecstatic Aug 2015 #94
They haven't even thought of going after the socialist non liberal yet, Hillary is doing good relati uponit7771 Aug 2015 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #112
She's a weak candidate now and will be weaker if she gets the nomination. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #113
This is a very appropriate quote from the article: George II Aug 2015 #127
Cilizza is a prep-school hack; ericson00 Aug 2015 #129
oh please. stop attacking cilizza because he went to prep school. cali Aug 2015 #142
wait, I thought you're supposed to hate the rich, I mean ericson00 Aug 2015 #143
She completely lacks integrity in additon to LondonReign2 Aug 2015 #130
Oh goody, another circle jerk thread ... LannyDeVaney Aug 2015 #133
I have voted for Democrats in 12 consecutive presidential elections. Zorra Aug 2015 #137
Yet another anonymous "spokesperson" on the subject? MineralMan Aug 2015 #148
The electorate resents it's a train daredtowork Aug 2015 #149
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maybe Hillary Clinton jus...»Reply #64