Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(143,999 posts)
33. Tickets are not that expensive
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 03:47 PM
Sep 2015

You can come and ask your own questions. The lady who was mistreated badly by the police is suing and has a great case. http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_102565.shtml

Attorney Sam Cammack III vowed to “make them pay,” as he and Charnesia Corley detailed the inhumane treatment she said she suffered at the hands of one male and two female deputies on June 21.

“They completely stripped this 21-year-old lady naked and held her face down on the ground with her hands hog tied behind her really with handcuffs and had her feet up behind her ears, causing her a tremendous amount of pain. And they spread her legs open and stuffed their fingers inside of her and had her in that position for 11 minutes,” Atty. Cammack told The Final Call. He said his client intends to sue the Sheriff’s Department for $20-30 million.

As noted in your article, two other ladies are suing the Texas DPS.
I do not believe any dems in Congress are going to risk angering the Clintons at this point in time. djean111 Sep 2015 #1
It's absolutely not that they don't want to risk angering HRC Gman Sep 2015 #5
Sorta telling that sanders worked with some of them 20 years yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #10
"I expect that we’ll have many more productive meetings like this in the future" n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #32
more like ~9 BlueStateLib Sep 2015 #56
No, Sanders had 16 years in the House before that. Nt stevenleser Sep 2015 #66
Everybody knows that the Clintons keep a "grudge list". m-lekktor Sep 2015 #38
Put it this way Gman Sep 2015 #46
Then why did many Hillary Clinton supporters back a loser in 2008? cascadiance Sep 2015 #76
Thank you! I've been trying to figure out how to overlap those two graphs for a while! LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #94
So what did Obama do to consolidate everyone? Gman Sep 2015 #96
I think you need to be more descriptive of what he actually did to "include Hillary supporters"... cascadiance Sep 2015 #100
I don't think moving to the right of center is going to be in Bernie's playbook LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #106
There's only one proven loser in this race. frylock Sep 2015 #109
Yep. I'm not holding out for azmom Sep 2015 #7
ME too madokie Sep 2015 #23
You gotta start somewhere. HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #2
Hillary is the establishment candidate. azmom Sep 2015 #3
+1 deutsey Sep 2015 #41
6 people isn't "nobody" - it's 13% of the CBC cyberswede Sep 2015 #4
And Rangell, Conyers, and Jackson Lee aren't small names Scootaloo Sep 2015 #8
What are they waiting for? stevil Sep 2015 #60
Who's waiting? Scootaloo Sep 2015 #61
I dunno, stevil Sep 2015 #68
Congresspeople tend to be busy. Well. The Democratic ones, anyway. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #69
True stevil Sep 2015 #71
I didn't know we were talkign about endorsements now. When did the subject change? Scootaloo Sep 2015 #72
You are right, I dug a little deeper and changed the subject stevil Sep 2015 #73
You were digging alright n/t Scootaloo Sep 2015 #74
I was digging your excuse stevil Sep 2015 #75
If you feed him, Scootaloo, he'll only get more hungry demwing Sep 2015 #86
Oh! Like Loge in the hall of Utgard-Loki. Gotcha Scootaloo Sep 2015 #91
Yes! like wildfire itself! demwing Sep 2015 #99
And if you support Hillary, a little longer still demwing Sep 2015 #85
Conyers and Rangell are both of the founding members still in Congress jfern Sep 2015 #63
That's what I'm saying Scootaloo Sep 2015 #64
Well, you know to 'some' unless 100% of them show up that spells trouble. NorthCarolina Sep 2015 #11
And if 100% DID show up, they'd simply be dismissed osmehow Scootaloo Sep 2015 #70
Thanks for posting the facts. The op left out this part too: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #15
thanks for posting that grasswire Sep 2015 #17
Ikr? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #18
Thanks for posting this important omission, musta been a fluke. appalachiablue Sep 2015 #25
My pleasure! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #26
You mean the OP was deliberately misleading? Good Heavens! arcane1 Sep 2015 #28
Well it didn't fit the narrative. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #29
Another fact the OP didn't bother to include jeff47 Sep 2015 #93
Well isn't that special? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #104
The good news is that there will be more meetings Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #6
We have work to do artislife Sep 2015 #9
This is no lie! imthevicar Sep 2015 #12
That is false Gothmog Sep 2015 #14
Bernie is raising tons of money, and he's seeking the endorsements of the people magical thyme Sep 2015 #22
Why don't you compare endorsements Gothmog Sep 2015 #34
because imo those endorsements don't matter. what matters is who *the people* endorse. magical thyme Sep 2015 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #42
That's like saying you like Fox News as a news source because they get more advertiser money... cascadiance Sep 2015 #77
Fox is the highest rated cable news agency.. frylock Sep 2015 #112
Nothing more influential than being endorsed by a group with a 75% disapproval rating.. frylock Sep 2015 #111
Go look at Obama ' s numbers in 2007 hack89 Sep 2015 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #47
I was talking about money nt hack89 Sep 2015 #50
This isn't about money. The fact that hes kicking clintons ass on Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #51
And the fact he is getting his ass kicked in the other 48 hack89 Sep 2015 #52
Clearly you just don't get it, but you will. Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #53
This is my tenth presidential election hack89 Sep 2015 #54
So is it a lack of money or is he a bad candidate? I think he's the right candidate at the right Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #57
He talks a great game hack89 Sep 2015 #59
It'll be my fifth Scootaloo Sep 2015 #67
So Bernie 's talk of a revolution is just talk? hack89 Sep 2015 #81
And you have to go back TWENTY elections to match the conditions of the middle class of today! cascadiance Sep 2015 #79
Times are different every election hack89 Sep 2015 #82
"Reality sets in" says nothing... cascadiance Sep 2015 #101
Bernie is not a transformational candidate hack89 Sep 2015 #115
And these are one of those times that are different.. frylock Sep 2015 #113
Time will tell. nt hack89 Sep 2015 #114
UMMMM Look at them for YOURSELF!!!! cascadiance Sep 2015 #78
I was talking about money hack89 Sep 2015 #80
Funny. Bernie's talking about money as well... demwing Sep 2015 #87
"Bernie is raising tons of money" hack89 Sep 2015 #88
How much? A billion? Is that REALLY what's required? demwing Sep 2015 #89
We are going to find out hack89 Sep 2015 #90
B.O. wasn't expected to have any effect, Most of his doners were Big Money. imthevicar Sep 2015 #48
Sheila Jackson Lee is supporting Hillary Clinton Gothmog Sep 2015 #13
ask her about this too pls questionseverything Sep 2015 #30
Tickets are not that expensive Gothmog Sep 2015 #33
harris county is a couple thousand miles from me questionseverything Sep 2015 #39
The Johnson Jordan dinner is in Austin Gothmog Sep 2015 #45
Well, it's not like Bernie's twiddling his thumbs NJCher Sep 2015 #16
And how many showed up for Clinton's meeting with the CBC? jeff47 Sep 2015 #19
this needs to be a stand-alone thread... dorkzilla Sep 2015 #62
It's hard to believe that Clinton can go all the way with a campaign based entirely on race Doctor_J Sep 2015 #20
they fail to mention that the majority of them had scheduling conflicts magical thyme Sep 2015 #21
Tries to meet? If they met, which they did, then he suceeded in meeting with them.. frylock Sep 2015 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #27
The Sanders campaign has not provided evidence of viability Gothmog Sep 2015 #31
Changing the subject by replying to your own OP arcane1 Sep 2015 #35
Sanders is doing very poorly with African American voters Gothmog Sep 2015 #37
"I expect that we’ll have many more productive meetings like this in the future" n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #40
You know, I got bored of playing whack-a-mole when I was six Scootaloo Sep 2015 #65
add +1 to the "Bernie is unelectable" meme counter. nt antigop Sep 2015 #58
Sanders will not be able to broaden his base unless he can show viability Gothmog Sep 2015 #83
add +1 to the "Bernie is unelectable" meme counter. nt antigop Sep 2015 #84
And I keep saying that is exactly why Hillary will lose the primary again. ieoeja Sep 2015 #108
Sanders will "fight" them uponit7771 Sep 2015 #107
Bernie's association with Cornell West may have been a factor. oasis Sep 2015 #43
That's unfortunate of them mythology Sep 2015 #49
One Must Tread Lightly - Lest The DLC Third Way Juggernaut Take Notice And Spite Thee cantbeserious Sep 2015 #55
He is pandering to LU students this morning. SouthernProgressive Sep 2015 #92
What is he saying that is pandering? Or do think merely by showing up there he is pandering? LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #95
It is so predictable. Aerows Sep 2015 #98
Let's all just out our fingers in our ears Armstead Sep 2015 #97
Do you oppose Democrats or progressives speaking at Liberty University? David__77 Sep 2015 #102
Students at Liberty University listening to a political speech are your "Enemy"? KeepItReal Sep 2015 #103
Pandering? Like when Hillary told right wingers she supported a ban on late term abortions? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #105
Hillary on The 700 Club in 2008 asked about LGBT issues ... changes subject. ieoeja Sep 2015 #110
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders tries to m...»Reply #33