Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie responds to Clinton attack via Jennifer Epstein Bloomberg Politics correspondent [View all]morningfog
(18,115 posts)89. What a load of shit! I understand your embarassment with Hillary here.
It's shameful. But the PAC was set up to coordinate with her campaign directly. THAT IS NOT IN DISPUTE.
You cannot now claim that some part of the coordinated PAC is not coordinated. That is some twisted double think, even for Hillary folk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie responds to Clinton attack via Jennifer Epstein Bloomberg Politics correspondent [View all]
Luminous Animal
Sep 2015
OP
she has the responsibility to come out and firmly, unequivocably disavow them. The longer she
roguevalley
Sep 2015
#54
I agree. This is going to be about whatever it takes for her and it will in the offset only
roguevalley
Sep 2015
#60
The cognitive dissonance is hilarious. They know its wrong but don't have the spine to own it
morningfog
Sep 2015
#33
Nothing short of video evidence of the actual meeting with Hillary approving it will do!
LondonReign2
Sep 2015
#69
Who needs evidence when the world of speculation is wide open? SuperPac envy, maybe?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#84
so the coordinating Super PAC abruptly starts operating as a loose cannon
virtualobserver
Sep 2015
#34
She needs to come out loud and hard against such smears and demand the the group
tblue37
Sep 2015
#67
Superpacs speak for themselves....the headline is purposely misleading...of course.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#4
Incorrect, again. See facts everywhere. See another opinion post that has Superpac in the headline.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#7
She coordinates? Evidence needed. And what has Clinton actually said about attacking each other???
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#11
Evidence of THIS coordination....still zero. It is the OTHER party that needs no evidence, remember?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#81
An MSNBC video of yore is not evidence! On THIS allegation there is ZERO evidence, which is now
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#83
Where is the email? Why is the main piece missing? And where is the evidence countering the facts of the matter down thread?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#101
What I get is a lot of supporters have been fooled again into histrionics over another half-baked article.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#103
Please proceed....the whole article is being debunked....I get it. Frustrating.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#105
It's getting close to 24 hours now and they haven't tried to correct this record yet
arcane1
Sep 2015
#114
"Correct the Record" the Super Pac in question has claimed, multiple times in many
Luminous Animal
Sep 2015
#9
I was thinking that very thing a few moments ago. It's like the Hillary team in stuck in time
Hollingsworth
Sep 2015
#19
Yeah, that's a better description of the media-created "strongman" than the real guy.
arcane1
Sep 2015
#50
One would *think* that only a republican would attack Sanders for helping poor people.
bunnies
Sep 2015
#47
He knew from the get-go he would be outspent, and attacked by the powers he threatens
arcane1
Sep 2015
#62
She will lose on the issues. Sanders and O'Malley both are light-years beyond on issues
arcane1
Sep 2015
#92
Yes, but do they think people are not noticing this? The fact that we do have
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#94