Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
89. What a load of shit! I understand your embarassment with Hillary here.
Tue Sep 15, 2015, 03:40 PM
Sep 2015

It's shameful. But the PAC was set up to coordinate with her campaign directly. THAT IS NOT IN DISPUTE.

You cannot now claim that some part of the coordinated PAC is not coordinated. That is some twisted double think, even for Hillary folk.

Is it a Hillary attack or is it a Super-PAC that supports Hillary? Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #1
They can coordinate as long as they limit their activities to the internet. arcane1 Sep 2015 #3
OK I just read the article Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #14
It would otherwise make no sense to limit themselves to the internet. arcane1 Sep 2015 #20
Again.... Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #21
The coordination is old news: morningfog Sep 2015 #22
"As president I will reform the finances of every campaign. After this one" arcane1 Sep 2015 #28
Yeahup..... daleanime Sep 2015 #41
she has the responsibility to come out and firmly, unequivocably disavow them. The longer she roguevalley Sep 2015 #54
"If she wants this to be about issues" is a pretty damned huge "if" n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #58
I agree. This is going to be about whatever it takes for her and it will in the offset only roguevalley Sep 2015 #60
I thought Hillary wasn't going to attack Bernie Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2015 #120
Not even Stephen Colbert used that loophole. Admiral Loinpresser Sep 2015 #119
The good ol' "plausible deniability" ruse, eh? 99Forever Sep 2015 #25
From May 2015: "Hillary Clinton plans to coordinate directly with super PAC" arcane1 Sep 2015 #26
Like I said... Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #29
It's not possible, it's intended n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #31
The cognitive dissonance is hilarious. They know its wrong but don't have the spine to own it morningfog Sep 2015 #33
You have to be fucking kidding. L O FUCKING L. morningfog Sep 2015 #32
Yep MissDeeds Sep 2015 #46
So they literally announce that they will be coordinating with this PAC jeff47 Sep 2015 #38
do you think they would publish it? passiveporcupine Sep 2015 #44
Nothing short of video evidence of the actual meeting with Hillary approving it will do! LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #69
Who needs evidence when the world of speculation is wide open? SuperPac envy, maybe? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #84
I'm convinced Cheney didn't out Valerie Plame either LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #88
Dishonest people come to the conclusions they want to come to. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #87
so the coordinating Super PAC abruptly starts operating as a loose cannon virtualobserver Sep 2015 #34
She needs to come out loud and hard against such smears and demand the the group tblue37 Sep 2015 #67
Get much sand in ears when burying head? pocoloco Sep 2015 #73
Both LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #5
It's the PAC with which Hillary coordinates, so no distinction. morningfog Sep 2015 #10
Did you watch Colbert and Stewart on this issue? Android3.14 Sep 2015 #48
I wish Comedy Central would do a clip show of those segments. winter is coming Sep 2015 #51
Has Hillary condemned it and issued an apology to Sanders for it? Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #68
Wow. Bern Autumn Sep 2015 #2
Superpacs speak for themselves....the headline is purposely misleading...of course. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #4
Incorrect. See posts above LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #6
Incorrect, again. See facts everywhere. See another opinion post that has Superpac in the headline. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #7
It is a Super-PAC the Clinton campaign is coordinating with LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #8
She coordinates? Evidence needed. And what has Clinton actually said about attacking each other??? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #11
Here you go LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #17
Evidence of THIS coordination....still zero. It is the OTHER party that needs no evidence, remember? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #81
Sigh LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #86
You are wrong. Here is a link to help you understand. morningfog Sep 2015 #27
An MSNBC video of yore is not evidence! On THIS allegation there is ZERO evidence, which is now Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #83
What a load of shit! I understand your embarassment with Hillary here. morningfog Sep 2015 #89
For Sanders folks now resorting to "shit", I ditto the thinking. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #98
You aren't being honest, but what's new. morningfog Sep 2015 #100
Where is the email? Why is the main piece missing? And where is the evidence countering the facts of the matter down thread? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #101
I get it, you don't trust the Hillary Campaign when they said morningfog Sep 2015 #102
What I get is a lot of supporters have been fooled again into histrionics over another half-baked article. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #103
I can't wait to hear Hillary disavow Brock and CTR. morningfog Sep 2015 #104
Please proceed....the whole article is being debunked....I get it. Frustrating. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #105
So no position? Thought so. morningfog Sep 2015 #106
But it's being debunked!!1 arcane1 Sep 2015 #107
What they meant was: I'm waiting for talking points!! morningfog Sep 2015 #108
Debunked by whom? Correct the Record? frylock Sep 2015 #112
It's getting close to 24 hours now and they haven't tried to correct this record yet arcane1 Sep 2015 #114
Fred has flipped the script. Now we're attacking Brock.. frylock Sep 2015 #118
You're in luck. Here's a video of Brock talking about the email right now.. frylock Sep 2015 #116
This message was self-deleted by its author Phlem Sep 2015 #85
Apparently Clinton "evolved" on not attacking Sanders. bunnies Sep 2015 #52
Letting her minions do it for her, using right-wing techniques n/t arcane1 Sep 2015 #53
Who in their right mind attacks someone for helping the poor? bunnies Sep 2015 #57
"Moderates" apparently do. arcane1 Sep 2015 #59
If it serves them. Apparently. bunnies Sep 2015 #63
Amen to that! arcane1 Sep 2015 #64
Meet the new Clinton demwing Sep 2015 #71
She coordinates? AlbertCat Sep 2015 #78
You are dead wrong. Hillary coordinates with this PAC. morningfog Sep 2015 #12
"Correct the Record" the Super Pac in question has claimed, multiple times in many Luminous Animal Sep 2015 #9
This is hilarious Report1212 Sep 2015 #39
the headline is purposely misleading AlbertCat Sep 2015 #82
Great response. morningfog Sep 2015 #13
The sting and the bern. Hollingsworth Sep 2015 #15
Another huge unforced error by Camp Weathervane. 99Forever Sep 2015 #16
You know they must have a truckload of K-Y Jelly!! pocoloco Sep 2015 #76
This was such a stupid attack against Bernie. askew Sep 2015 #18
I was thinking that very thing a few moments ago. It's like the Hillary team in stuck in time Hollingsworth Sep 2015 #19
It baffles me who the intended audience for this would be. arcane1 Sep 2015 #30
Hill shills. They are going to get gutter nasty. morningfog Sep 2015 #35
She is trying to keep Dick Cheney from voting for Bernie virtualobserver Sep 2015 #36
Sending out talking points. We'll see them in DU posts in the near future. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #40
What? You don't think trying to link Bernie to LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #72
Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow.. frylock Sep 2015 #113
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Sep 2015 #23
Correct the Record Truprogressive85 Sep 2015 #24
Righteous. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #37
Hillary or someone close to her needs to let the PACS know to lay off. lark Sep 2015 #42
"Dead communist dictator?" Cheese Sandwich Sep 2015 #43
Yeah, that's a better description of the media-created "strongman" than the real guy. arcane1 Sep 2015 #50
I HOPE he was just referring to the depiction that they were using MisterP Sep 2015 #55
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #45
One would *think* that only a republican would attack Sanders for helping poor people. bunnies Sep 2015 #47
Let the poor freeze to death? left-of-center2012 Sep 2015 #56
Apparently. Because Chavez! or something. bunnies Sep 2015 #61
Lets face HRC is a DINO! imthevicar Sep 2015 #90
Looks like Bernie anticipated this kind of crap MissDeeds Sep 2015 #49
He knew from the get-go he would be outspent, and attacked by the powers he threatens arcane1 Sep 2015 #62
If he is the nominee he WILL take the money. laureloak Sep 2015 #65
If Hillary is the nominee she WILL oppose the TPP demwing Sep 2015 #70
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #66
Fantastic response Bernie. Avalux Sep 2015 #74
Look at it this way: Clinton attacks are toughening Bernie up for the GE senz Sep 2015 #75
I'm sure Hillary will denounce the SuperPac and return their money. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #77
+1 nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #111
Not a second dpatbrown Sep 2015 #79
No doubt the two secretly support her. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #80
Why don't they talk about issues? All they DO is try to find ways to attack sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #91
She will lose on the issues. Sanders and O'Malley both are light-years beyond on issues arcane1 Sep 2015 #92
Yes, but do they think people are not noticing this? The fact that we do have sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #94
I think they seriously believed Sanders would be gone by now, a grumpy, dismissed racist arcane1 Sep 2015 #95
You don't have any proof HRC did this FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #93
blahblahblah GOP blahblah.. frylock Sep 2015 #115
Yes, we expect it from the GOP. Not from the Dem morningfog Sep 2015 #121
Why doesn't HRC just hire Karl Rove? d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #96
Let the master respond Fairgo Sep 2015 #97
Yes, his response was reasonable , sadoldgirl Sep 2015 #99
Spot on answer from Sanders Babel_17 Sep 2015 #109
It was the kind of onslaught I expected to see from Hillary Clinton. frylock Sep 2015 #110
dark money portlander23 Sep 2015 #117
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie responds to Clinto...»Reply #89