Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
1. How Team Clinton screwed up the security on her server
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:16 PM
Sep 2015

What we know so far:

1) Communications with her server were not encrypted for the first 3 months.
https://www.venafi.com/blog/post/what-venafi-trustnet-tells-us-about-the-clinton-email-server/

2) They left the default VPN keys installed on her server
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-04/clinton-s-e-mail-system-built-for-privacy-though-not-security

Using those addresses, McGeorge discovered that the certificate appearing on the site Tuesday appeared to be the factory default for the security appliance, made by Fortinet Inc., running the service.


3) They were using, and continue to use, self-signed SSL certificates
http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042

4) They set up a .com domain, enabling the typosquater who has registered clintonmail.com (no "e" before "mail&quot . Whoever registered that domain is in a perfect position to steal login information or perform spear phishing attacks.

5) Her ISP was repeatedly hacked by China
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=615632
How Team Clinton screwed up the security on her server jeff47 Sep 2015 #1
Also, they didn't pay the extra $10 for private domain registration. ALWAYS the mark of an amateur. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #6
Amateurish, but not that bad in this case jeff47 Sep 2015 #17
I just meant that to the right people with bad intent, non-private registration could be like a... DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #20
Yeah, but she also traveled to China and Russia. jeff47 Sep 2015 #21
one other thing this email stuff presents an opportunity for bigtree Sep 2015 #2
it's an article in Newsweek, which a lot of people outside of DU read and trust magical thyme Sep 2015 #4
I decided to click in the link to check your claim...the article is from Reuters, reprinted. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #7
a lot of people read Newsweek and a lot of people read Reuters. magical thyme Sep 2015 #10
Lot of people read Fox and NY Post. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #11
holy crap. 5 replies -- almost 50% -- on a topic you are "bored" with. magical thyme Sep 2015 #15
a lot of people can't deal. they are always the same three people. roguevalley Sep 2015 #24
the issue remains the same bigtree Sep 2015 #8
The question, no quote, was about foreign officials who use private servers for "official business". Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #9
you're so bored with it you had to reply 3 times? make that 4 times! magical thyme Sep 2015 #12
My work here is done. Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #13
as far as Clinton is concerned bigtree Sep 2015 #18
take out clinton, put in bush. You would be gathering firewood as i write this roguevalley Sep 2015 #25
that's sophistry bigtree Sep 2015 #27
So NSA who knows a bit or two about breaking in to everything electronic, jeff47 Sep 2015 #16
they have their agenda bigtree Sep 2015 #22
And now you're beating the dead messenger's corpse. jeff47 Sep 2015 #23
'hate' has nothing to do with it bigtree Sep 2015 #28
And how does that close the security holes in her server? (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #44
Oh, please. 840high Sep 2015 #31
Eyes on the Prize: Get Bernie the Nomination, don't kiss the NSA's ass emulatorloo Sep 2015 #3
Yeah! What's the NSA know about breaking into servers anyway!!! jeff47 Sep 2015 #19
One can't distrust the NSA one day and become a fanboy the next emulatorloo Sep 2015 #36
What fanboy? jeff47 Sep 2015 #38
Simple concept: The enemy of my enemy is not my friend emulatorloo Sep 2015 #39
Simple concept: killing the messenger does not change the message. jeff47 Sep 2015 #42
I read the OP twice and still have no idea what the fuss is about. And since there is not a Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #5
That's correct Admiral hootinholler Sep 2015 #14
Funny how they were never hacked but NSA was. nt kelliekat44 Sep 2015 #26
Who was never hacked? Fawke Em Sep 2015 #30
You don't know. 840high Sep 2015 #32
Believe me, had it been hacked it would have been 24/7 over the news and FOX. nt kelliekat44 Sep 2015 #33
that's one of the things the FBI is looking into and they aren't talking to anybody magical thyme Sep 2015 #34
Because China and Russia announce their hacks. jeff47 Sep 2015 #43
And THAT is the issue with the private server. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #29
Which RW site is that speculation from? Fred Sanders Sep 2015 #35
I must point out... ljm2002 Sep 2015 #37
New hero of the Bernistas: the NSA chief! DanTex Sep 2015 #40
Who could ever possibly believe him? Rumor has it that Zorra Sep 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NSA Chief: Hillary Clinto...»Reply #1