Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: CNN debate numbers are in. HRC between 12-15%, Bernie...80-85%. The rest single digit....n/t [View all]It really was a good debate. I especially liked that there was very little mud slinging among the candidates. There was still some, but mostly, they stayed on point with talking about the issues.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CNN debate numbers are in. HRC between 12-15%, Bernie...80-85%. The rest single digit....n/t [View all]
monmouth4
Oct 2015
OP
Seconded. Who was asked? How were the questions asked? Online? Some Luntz group? what?
DisgustipatedinCA
Oct 2015
#9
I think they hit the 'guns' topic quicker than she would have wanted.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#21
And that's what he needs. More people trying to learn more about him. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#29
Despite what the pundits think, I think he snared more than undecideds last night.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#167
it's actually a terrific measure of enthusiasm too ... if a candidate's followers don't bother...
tomm2thumbs
Oct 2015
#147
The problem with your logic is that although it might have been manipulated, it seems to agree
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#200
Sure there can! The majority of people who watched the debate thought Bernie won.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#169
Not good indicators. All skewed to the internet population. Young Middle class white people.
stevenleser
Oct 2015
#106
That seems like a fairly even spread of internet users. It's almost like all demographics use it...
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#125
Thanks. Yes, as I said, the internet skews white, middle class (and higher income) and young. nt
stevenleser
Oct 2015
#126
You were good until you said: Young Middle class white people. What supporting evidence do you have
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#121
You mean the post that shows a largly evenly distributed demographic among internet users? Yeah.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#173
Hilary did not lose. She has generally gotten good reviews for her performance.
StevieM
Oct 2015
#131
So people voting doesn't matter, and we should let the handlers decide... got it.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#175
I just said that there would be scientifically conducted polls coming out soon and they would
StevieM
Oct 2015
#184
I can't believe the number of DUers who seemingly don't know the difference between online
Metric System
Oct 2015
#77
And Hillary had her best debate ever = 12-15%. Her rhetoric was tired, old, and sooo 20th century.
cpompilo
Oct 2015
#80
These are the online debate polls I could find--all have Bernie around 75% and Hillary around 17%:
tblue37
Oct 2015
#83
Oh everybody knows online polls are meaningless unless they are scientific
workinclasszero
Oct 2015
#86
I loved Bernie! I thought Hillary did well. I was impressed by O'Malley: never saw him before.
C Moon
Oct 2015
#93
The gender card bothered me too. Especially when it was clear the question was policy based.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#178
"If the online polls went the other way, recognize this thread would have been started by
BeanMusical
Oct 2015
#151
Sanders supporters efforts make FreeRepublic's 'Freeping' seem like kid's play.
wyldwolf
Oct 2015
#166
Folks are voting with there hearts, but Hillary won this debate hands down with realistic, pragmati
kelliekat44
Oct 2015
#123
CNN DEBATE RERUN - Anderson announced the "CNN FACEBOOK DEBATE" CNN told people to vote,
in_cog_ni_to
Oct 2015
#138
Interesting hypothesis. Particularly given that there were at least 6 polls that agreed.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#168
My argument is based on your claim. But here's ONE example from this very thread:
wyldwolf
Oct 2015
#183
Yup, they do. Meaning the majority who actually watched the debate (probable voters) thought he won.
Bubzer
Oct 2015
#187