2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Party loyalty is a means of control. I vote for those who will represent me, period. [View all]Tipperary
(6,930 posts)You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Oct 18, 2015, 11:09 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm not even sure why this was alerted on. Furthermore, the alerter decided not to fill us in on that reason.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Gratuitous personal insult.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There's nothing hide worthy here, especially since the alerter can't even state a reason for this alert. My assumption is that F4lconF16's is using the term "real" people as opposed to virtual people he meets on the Internet. There are no personal attacks here except possibly in a passive/aggressive way, but we've all seen far worse. Let it stand.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm only voting to hide because I understand the context, the context being that his response is directed at a core function of the DU TOS. As such, what he's saying is technically breaking the rules.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Absolutely nothing wrong with this post.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: really?