Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What exactly will not voting for the nominee accomplish? [View all]onenote
(42,680 posts)67. How would a Clinton presidency delay change?
When a republican presidency would accelerate change in the wrong direction: voting rights, gay rights, abortion rights, and on and on. Moreover, with the almost certain opportunity to name one or two justices to the SCOTUS, those rights would be set back for a generation. At least.
Do you think there are a lot of repubs out there that think a Sanders presidency would be preferable to a Bush presidency because it would "delay" the change that they'd get if only Trump or Cruz or Carson was elected?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
155 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm going to repeat to you something the dean of the law school at my undergraduate Alma Mater said.
Chan790
Oct 2015
#65
When Dubya Bush was in the White House and the Republicans controlled both Houses of Congress . . .
Major Hogwash
Oct 2015
#142
Not giving in to blackmail. I don't begrudge those who choose to give in. It's their vote.
GoneFishin
Oct 2015
#5
"Who else are those f*cking retards going to vote for" depressed turn-out.
Betty Karlson
Oct 2015
#10
I Will Vote For The Candidate Of My Choosing Via Write-In Ballot If Necessary - That Is My Right
cantbeserious
Oct 2015
#12
If you think that is the only thing that is accomplished by the election of a republican
onenote
Oct 2015
#60
Which district is solidly Blue enough where we (Democrats) can afford your strategy? ...
1StrongBlackMan
Oct 2015
#99
I would suggest looking at the most current polling before anyone did this.
thesquanderer
Oct 2015
#108
Then the Dems need to support a candidate that excites the voters (Hint - It isn't Hillary)
Android3.14
Oct 2015
#52
And the disaffected "send a message" left can succeed where the gop's ...
1StrongBlackMan
Oct 2015
#102
You mean the Republicans, right? You sure as hell aren't describing Bernie supporters.
GoneFishin
Oct 2015
#94
I agree that those who believe they are so pure that they will be sitting out the election....
NCTraveler
Oct 2015
#124
I will vote for my candidate in the primary and vote against the GOP in the general.
Vinca
Oct 2015
#35
if you're right and a Democrat can win without the votes of Sanders' supporters
onenote
Oct 2015
#62
So basically you are saying you hope most voters don't think or act like you do
onenote
Oct 2015
#92
Hopefully make the party realize "who else you gonna vote for?" is a terrible strategy.
jeff47
Oct 2015
#75
Yet in the end, you really don't want a republican to get elected and would prefer a Clinton win
onenote
Oct 2015
#118
No, it's prefer to an insane Republican, and "won't matter" versus a moderate Republican.
jeff47
Oct 2015
#128
What does promising to vote for any nominee even one that is compromised achieve?
CBGLuthier
Oct 2015
#81
People who don't vote are selfish. Their "principles" are more important than other people's lives.
seaglass
Oct 2015
#82
Accomplish? About the same thing I would "accomplish" by voting for the label.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2015
#112
What has holding our nose and voting for the less crappy candidate accomplished?
99Forever
Oct 2015
#129