Yep. Lots of posturing, lots of bombast, lots of CYA but little of substance. (Reply #3)

In the discussion thread: IGNORING US Destabilization of Libya, GOP Benghazi Hearing Asks Clinton All the WRONG QUESTIONS [View all]

Response to Segami (Original post)

Fri Oct 23, 2015, 03:09 PM

Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)

3. Yep. Lots of posturing, lots of bombast, lots of CYA but little of substance.

Little or nothing about the utter stupidity of involving the country in another idiotic middle east civil war.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

37 replies	Author	Time	Post
IGNORING US Destabilization of Libya, GOP Benghazi Hearing Asks Clinton All the WRONG QUESTIONS [View all]	Segami	Oct 2015	OP
"...In 2012, then-Congressman Dennis Kucinich,	Segami	Oct 2015	#1
"our nation spurred on a civil war, destroying the security and stability of Libya."	sabrina 1	Oct 2015	#14
K n R	Myrina	Oct 2015	#2
Yep. Lots of posturing, lots of bombast, lots of CYA but little of substance.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Oct 2015	#3
The clown panel of "Republican troglodytes"	Segami	Oct 2015	#4
Benghazi was a covert CIA station with strong indications it was Petraeus' baby	riderinthestorm	Oct 2015	#5
No skin off their ('uglican) backs. They are already bought and paid for. It's the taxpayers	erronis	Oct 2015	#13
Thanks. I've been asking these questions, and now, finally from Mel Goodman's testimony and	JDPriestly	Oct 2015	#16
Truth! And that is why they wouldn't go there. They really don't care about what happened, they	kelliekat44	Oct 2015	#19
Benghazi!! is a convenient, bipartisan diversion that like Whitewater cut off lines of investigation	leveymg	Oct 2015	#28
They were trying to track down all the illicit weapons.	joshcryer	Oct 2015	#33
Sy Hersh reported on where the weapons in Libya went	KoKo	Oct 2015	#6
Thanks. The Hersh article is the most coherent and logical explanation in my view, but of	JDPriestly	Oct 2015	#20
Message auto-removed	Name removed	Oct 2015	#7
K & R, can't rec this enough	dreamnightwind	Oct 2015	#8
Excellent response	Thespian2	Oct 2015	#10
( ._.)	Marty McGraw	Oct 2015	#11
+1000	valerief	Oct 2015	#12
I second your statement.	JDPriestly	Oct 2015	#24
Thanks,	Thespian2	Oct 2015	#9
We were assisting allies in removing Qaddafi and...	JaneyVee	Oct 2015	#15
What was Hillary's excuse for supporting the military coup in Honduras?	Uncle Joe	Oct 2015	#18
Neo-imperialist apologia, in the service of a partisan agenda. n/t	Comrade Grumpy	Oct 2015	#21
Coming from you, that's utterly laughable.	NuclearDem	Oct 2015	#23
A popular revolt supported by 1000s of foreign jihadis?	CJCRANE	Oct 2015	#35
Did you read the Seymour Hersh article?	JDPriestly	Oct 2015	#26
Kicked and recommended.	Uncle Joe	Oct 2015	#17
top constituency of the 2016 election (if not all)?	reddread	Oct 2015	#22
The permanent government: the Pentagon, intel agencies, foreign policy mandarins. Not elected, but	leveymg	Oct 2015	#37
knr! We removed a dictator and helped the country to hold elections ...	slipslidingaway	Oct 2015	#25
kick nt	slipslidingaway	Oct 2015	#27
This is the most rational, meaningful thread about these hearings on DU. Perhaps the only one.	leveymg	Oct 2015	#29
The intent is to harangue her	AgingAmerican	Oct 2015	#30
The result is to immunize her of consequences from her serial ME policy failures.	leveymg	Oct 2015	#36
K & R	Duppers	Oct 2015	#31
There was no way they could explore that aspect.	Turbineguy	Oct 2015	#32
really good post, thank you	heads up	Oct 2015	#34

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.