Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: No more quantum politics [View all]

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
19. Seriously???
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 06:09 PM
Oct 2015

Mad props for that!

What's the major malfunction? As an engineering type it seem like it should work provided the entanglement isn't, for lack of a better term, consumed.

No more quantum politics [View all] hootinholler Oct 2015 OP
........ daleanime Oct 2015 #1
I need to share this. Well done. azmom Oct 2015 #2
The Clinton Uncertainty Principle. Nice! n/t lumberjack_jeff Oct 2015 #3
HRC - The Quantum Candidate - She Is Till She Is Not cantbeserious Oct 2015 #4
The real problem is her entanglement with Big Finance mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #5
Spooky action at a distance has been confirmed as a real phenomenon Electric Monk Oct 2015 #6
Eventually, we should be able to do faster than light communications with the phenomena n/t hootinholler Oct 2015 #8
Use the subspace frequencies, Mister Worf! hifiguy Oct 2015 #11
I'm working on that mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #13
Why not? hifiguy Oct 2015 #17
For the record, they outclass me by far mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #26
Seriously??? hootinholler Oct 2015 #19
Yeah, the idea is to create entangled pair and send one stream through a double-slit mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #24
Apparent action at a distance hootinholler Oct 2015 #7
I always have to jump into discussions involving quantum mechanics :) mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #14
At least it is highly probable that you do. hifiguy Oct 2015 #18
Good point :) mindwalker_i Oct 2015 #25
Three quarks for Muster Mark! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #9
Professor Murray Gell-Mann hifiguy Oct 2015 #16
That is truly excellent, hoot! hifiguy Oct 2015 #10
Thanks! hootinholler Oct 2015 #12
I thought we settled on Heisenberg? Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #15
But, this has nothing to do with meth hootinholler Oct 2015 #20
I thought it was Heidelberg LastLiberal in PalmSprings Oct 2015 #22
This could easily lead to one hell of a sub-thread! Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #23
WAit a minute! gregcrawford Oct 2015 #21
"Schrodinger's Candidate" - consider this stolen Scootaloo Oct 2015 #27
but all of those superpac $ allow corporations to commit mhatrw Oct 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No more quantum politics»Reply #19