Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Whoopi to Bernie Sanders after his appearance on The View: [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)68. She also told Mitt Romney that she thought she could VOTE for HIM...
Then she got pissed at him when she found out he repeated it while snarking about the political leanings of the VIEW hosts at that 47% fundraiser where he was secretly recorded.
She's all about the purse, I think. She was so pissed off that he told on her, she wrote an eleven segment Tweet about it. You can see it at the link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/whoopi-goldberg-rips-mitt_n_1898799.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, who supports a candidate won't influence my decision. She AGREES with me re
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#3
Like I said, if the agree with ME, they have to be intelligent whether I like them or not!
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#8
When have you been referred to as an arrogant, female, on DU? non-lol. n/t
1StrongBlackMan
Oct 2015
#24
Would you be surprised to know there are Polanski apologists right here at DU?
cherokeeprogressive
Oct 2015
#33
I am not a Polanski apologist by any stretch of the imagination... but Whoopi was technically right
secondwind
Oct 2015
#69
Yeah, he sticks to his principles. I call that 'integrity' not 'inflexible'. Unless you think that
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#10
Only if you believe your JOB is to reach out to Republicans to "get things done".
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2015
#11
What I am interested in is a president that doesn't give a DAMN about what Republicans want.
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2015
#83
"even if he did have to give some ground < Over 7 million families thrown into the street, 4 million
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#40
Yes, she doesn't knee-jerk react. But she does 'evolve' when she has enough facts
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#18
I have no midea if she evolved because her previous position is irrelevant ...
1StrongBlackMan
Oct 2015
#28
That was the New York Times that reported that, based on BS's own writings on the topic.
MADem
Oct 2015
#60
Lol, OMG! Aside from the nonsense in the links, all of which failed to do what was intended since
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#64
There is a lot of "nonsense" in the links--and it was all written by Bernie Sanders, back in the day
MADem
Oct 2015
#65
Yes, that's what Bernie himself said. End of story, bad writing. It shows how little they can
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#66
No--he hasn't commented on these pieces. He was commenting on that dumb "rape fantasy" essay
MADem
Oct 2015
#67
We've already added this one to the list of terrible things we did know about Sanders, he's a
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#78
The fact of the matter is that this was neither an endorsement or a hope.....
Sheepshank
Oct 2015
#31
and she wasn't reasonable or pleasant when she dismissed ('DISSED') reference to Martin O'Malley.
elleng
Oct 2015
#37
I thought so too but she pissed me off when she dismissed a reference to Martin O'Malley.
elleng
Oct 2015
#36
Not in today's world, it can't. But hey, leave them in the dark, we tried to warn them
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#54
She is sadly missed. But I think I am going to start promoting the Establishment polls
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#58
What am I trying to do, other than promote MY candidate. She IS right, if she had been wrong
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#48
Well, she could have slammed him if her opinion wasn't what she stated, she's not at all
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#77