Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Clinton just briefly crested 90% likelihood for the Democratic nomination [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)82. You forget ...it's a "TwoFer"...Hillary/Bill Third Term...
There is honest disagreement among Dems whether this is a good idea or not. It smacks to some as Dynasty. Its an issue that will be brought up down the line.
Nothing to do with an Independent Woman running for President. It's a Legacy Woman running for President and has recognition because she was a First Lady and all the entitled power exactly because of name recognition has to be taken into consideration. Just saying.......Power=Privilege.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Clinton just briefly crested 90% likelihood for the Democratic nomination [View all]
Godhumor
Oct 2015
OP
I had read some post wanting the nomination to go to Sanders with perhaps 25%
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#3
Wrong again, do some research on superdelegates, their vote at the convention counts like the
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#40
There is a 90% probablity that a warm, strong, intelligent woman will be in the Oval office.
riversedge
Oct 2015
#8
Rigging? Nice and handy little excuse ready for why Bernie gets crushed in the primary process. n/t
livetohike
Oct 2015
#21
Sounds like you believe every elecion your candidates don't win the election is "rigged."
demosincebirth
Oct 2015
#88
Let's see, 90% for HRC and you are suggesting oligarchs, 90% does not equal government by the few,
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#27
In other words the 10% represents the desire. Still does not equate to ruling by the few.
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#36
It could be interrupted as votes in some ways, it does not say government by the few.
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#66
If Hillary wins the office of presidency it will not be by a vote from the few, it will
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#73
It doesn't have to say "government by the few", because that's just common knowledge. eom
NorthCarolina
Oct 2015
#68
Well, she could go back to Walmart and Sanders could return to writing articles about women's
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#29