2016 Postmortem

merrily

(45,251 posts)

39. I saw #4 and your reply. Neither answered my question.

Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:58 PM

Nov 2015

Assuming just for the purposes of discussing my question that CBS had decided not put up Part IV. With whom would CBS have been conspiring?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why CBS Is Not Publishing The 4th Part Of The Democratic Debate [View all] Ferd Berfel Nov 2015 OP

For krist fucking sake. randys1 Nov 2015 #1

Have I been had again? randys1 Nov 2015 #59

Here. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #2

Thanks for that. Betty Karlson Nov 2015 #4

Wow did you just go full on conspiracy. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #6

Who are the conspirators and what did they conspire to do? merrily Nov 2015 #32

See post 4. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #36

I saw #4 and your reply. Neither answered my question. merrily Nov 2015 #39

Wall Street? Ferd Berfel Nov 2015 #54

We can only guess, Ferd, we can only guess. merrily Nov 2015 #62

Yes, full on conspiracy which describes the participants as Fascists! Too bad its totally false.... George II Nov 2015 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #60

Thank you. This part was unavailable as of yesterday. PotatoChip Nov 2015 #20

"Thank you. This part was unavailable as of yesterday." NCTraveler Nov 2015 #26

I'm saying I couldn't find it. PotatoChip Nov 2015 #34

Unavailable means something. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #35

I didn't claim "it" meant anything. PotatoChip Nov 2015 #38

Unavailable means something. AlbertCat Nov 2015 #44

"This part was unavailable as of yesterday" sufrommich Nov 2015 #28

All parts were up on November 14, the night of the debate (which means less than an hour... George II Nov 2015 #52

Here you go. moobu2 Nov 2015 #3

LOL MaggieD Nov 2015 #24

Nice. merrily Nov 2015 #33

Aw, thanks! Too funny!! Duval Nov 2015 #50

Damn fascist oligarchy. Can't even scrub a video properly... SidDithers Nov 2015 #5

I knew as soon as I read the title that it would be debunked sufrommich Nov 2015 #7

LOL ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2015 #21

"I didn't see it! I looked for a full .50th of a second and DID NOT SEE IT!!!!!" AlbertCat Nov 2015 #46

If we had to serve cheese with all the upaloopa Nov 2015 #23

Geeze they really suck at being fascist oligarchs MaggieD Nov 2015 #25

Another person who posted a Hillary Debate video Segami Nov 2015 #8

If you would have bothered to read through the thread, sufrommich Nov 2015 #13

I did read the threads... Segami Nov 2015 #15

A Bernie supporter on his facebook feed... MaggieD Nov 2015 #37

Have you ever read the comments on Debbie Wasserman Schultz FB page? AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #80

"Why Bernie Supporters Should Watch Out For Lawrence Lessig" NCTraveler Nov 2015 #9

I think that blog is "Young Progressive REPUBLICAN Voices." I think they trolling for the GOP! MADem Nov 2015 #43

It's a conspiracy. nt Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #10

Knock knock 72DejaVu Nov 2015 #11

Bernie is building a sizable tinfoil hat brigade firebrand80 Nov 2015 #12

Bye bye Trajan Nov 2015 #29

Please add me to your list as well. Agschmid Nov 2015 #41

your welcome demwing Nov 2015 #57

Phew. Agschmid Nov 2015 #58

lol. BootinUp Nov 2015 #64

I figure let's just get it over with. Agschmid Nov 2015 #65

You have a Bernie avatar demwing Nov 2015 #56

third way DhhD Nov 2015 #66

ALCOA! FSogol Nov 2015 #14

Why Ferd Berfel Can't Find the 4th Part MineralMan Nov 2015 #16

I blame Red Stewart,Big liberal and gamer, for the fact free sufrommich Nov 2015 #17

It's always good to check such articles for facts. MineralMan Nov 2015 #19

For a minute there, I read Rod Stewart! boston bean Nov 2015 #27

BECAUSE THE OLIGARCHY, duh ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2015 #22

Never have I seen a leading member of the Democratic Party so oasis Nov 2015 #18

CBS = "Cock-and-Bull Story" (nt) KansDem Nov 2015 #30

It should be obvious who is behind this conspiracy!!1!1! tritsofme Nov 2015 #31

Actually it was... dorkzilla Nov 2015 #40

But they DID "publish it." Why would this source tell such a massive, honking LIE? MADem Nov 2015 #42

You really should do some research before you post blatant lies. The FULL transcript.... George II Nov 2015 #45

A blatant lie with 46 recs. nt sufrommich Nov 2015 #47

Yes, and among them someone with the amazing screen name "I hate liars"!! George II Nov 2015 #48

"The new normal" Agschmid Nov 2015 #51

66 recs now. Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #72

Why are there 52 recs on a debunked story? nt BumRushDaShow Nov 2015 #53

CBSN did post Part 4 (Just two days the rest of the debate was posted). PoliticalMalcontent Nov 2015 #55

Because of completely non conspiratorial reasons demwing Nov 2015 #63

We don't know the reason nor will we. PoliticalMalcontent Nov 2015 #68

Just in case I was being unclear demwing Nov 2015 #69

My apologies :) PoliticalMalcontent Nov 2015 #73

I will demwing Nov 2015 #75

Blatant bias is what we have come to expect from the corporate media. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #61

Well, you survived a jury of your peers: chervilant Nov 2015 #67

Debunked crock of shit. Too bad you're just out of MIRT's reach. MerryBlooms Nov 2015 #70

This post has 66 recs. Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #71

That's not for me to judge. Folks have their own reasons when they rec-it's not always in agreement. MerryBlooms Nov 2015 #74

Please show us where this was debunked AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #81

Here Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #82

Please link to part 4 of the debate FROM CBS AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #83

You prefer the debate to be split up in parts? Okie dokie.... Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #84

Kick for exposing the "Fascist Oligarchy" Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #76

Brothers. Sisters. We don't need no Fascist Groove Thing. Codeine Nov 2015 #77

hmmmm..... Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #78

. Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #79

. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #85