Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
83. Hillary served as president of the Wellesley Young Republicans
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 12:57 PM
Dec 2015

and was involved with the Republican party for some years afterwards

Her father had been very supportive of the Republicans.

In 1968, when she was nearly 21, Hillary worked as a intern for Nixon’s future Secretary of Defense, Melvin Laird - who supported Nixon’s policies of invading Cambodia and escalating the war in Vietnam. And she had some acquaintance with future Republican president Gerald Ford. Hillary became eligible to vote on her Oct, 1968, 21st birthday.


1968 (approximate) picture of Clinton interning with Republicans - she has the white hair band.

She did attend some Democrat events around that time but some (Carl Bernstein? - can't recall where I read it) feel it was as an "operative" for Nixon, as was apparently a common thing for young Republicans to do back then.

By '72, she'd made the transition to the Democrats and worked with Bill Clinton to help Eugene McCarthy's bid (in Texas).

It was a long time ago. I'm just responding with this to those taking a swipe at Elizabeth Warren for her Republican registration of years ago. Both women are clearly Democrats with Hillary's positions closer to Republicans.

You get to decide who is a Democrat? upaloopa Dec 2015 #1
My dear, no one said that. Fearless Dec 2015 #2
Seems like you have already done that mindwalker_i Dec 2015 #7
Yeah, Hillary has been a Democrat for many many many years. bravenak Dec 2015 #18
Yes I do get to decide who is a Democrat. Cassiopeia Dec 2015 #21
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Dec 2015 #23
Ooh, good answer! Le Taz Hot Dec 2015 #40
No, the individual and the Party "decides who is a Democrat". What makes you think.... George II Dec 2015 #129
Poster, please. The OP could hardly be milder. merrily Dec 2015 #29
Well if voters were a marker for anything Hillary would be in first place Sanders in second and upaloopa Dec 2015 #57
No one has voted yet, so no. But, good try moving the goalpost anyway! merrily Dec 2015 #59
In 60 days they will. Historic NY Dec 2015 #126
And I guess Obama lost the election the last time we tried to measure it this way... cascadiance Dec 2015 #107
really? Perogie Dec 2015 #30
yup ibegurpard Dec 2015 #3
'Democrats' should have a capital D. onehandle Dec 2015 #4
That is something a Democrat is supposed to know. oasis Dec 2015 #16
Actually, New Democrats could use a lot more lower case d democracy. merrily Dec 2015 #31
Elizabeth Warren was a Republican until the 90s while Hillary has been a staunch party supporter Metric System Dec 2015 #5
"Staunch Party Supporter"....yea, The Third Way Party supporter! Segami Dec 2015 #6
Wasn't Hillary a Goldwater girl in the 60s? Jarqui Dec 2015 #10
She could not even vote yet. Good Grief!! bravenak Dec 2015 #19
And when she could first vote, she voted Republican. merrily Dec 2015 #34
that is baldly false dsc Dec 2015 #43
You've pulled this kind of crap on me before. I didn't say she voted for Goldwater. merrily Dec 2015 #71
you said, and I quote, when she was old enough to vote she voted for a Republican dsc Dec 2015 #90
As I said, I never said Goldwater and what you quoted doesn't say Goldwater. merrily Dec 2015 #91
more GOP members voted for the CRA of 64 than Democratic ones (by percentage) dsc Dec 2015 #93
Too bad none of that has a thing to do with Hillary. merrily Dec 2015 #95
Do you really think leftynyc Dec 2015 #65
Prove it. merrily Dec 2015 #72
You made the claim, cupcake leftynyc Dec 2015 #76
"Cupcake?" Yuck. merrily Dec 2015 #77
Exactly how I felt leftynyc Dec 2015 #80
Hi there "Cupcake." pangaia Dec 2015 #103
Why would you want to do that? Are you in a mood to be that sexist? merrily Dec 2015 #105
No No No.. sorry. pangaia Dec 2015 #111
Yes, the sarcasm smilie clarifies. merrily Dec 2015 #113
I'm so naive I don't even get the sexism in skippy OR cupcake. pangaia Dec 2015 #120
Well, Skippy might not be sexist. Usually, it's one guy poster calling another guy poster merrily Dec 2015 #122
Thanks.. pangaia Dec 2015 #123
Hillary served as president of the Wellesley Young Republicans Jarqui Dec 2015 #83
So? EW voted for Reagan when she was an ADULT. Like, finished with college and everything. bravenak Dec 2015 #84
Prove that please with links Jarqui Dec 2015 #85
She said she was a Republican. bravenak Dec 2015 #86
In other words, your allegation that Warren voted for Reagan is made up conjecture Jarqui Dec 2015 #87
Pffffttt! bravenak Dec 2015 #88
Check out those haircuts. pangaia Dec 2015 #109
fyi I think Hillary is shown beside Gerald Ford (on her left) in this 1968 picture Jarqui Dec 2015 #118
Hillary was a Democrat by 1968. And it's "Democratic events," not "Democrat events." SunSeeker Dec 2015 #121
Hillary did not vote for Goldwater. She was too young to vote in 1964. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #20
You have trouble reading brentspeak Dec 2015 #89
You have trouble reading. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #117
No, she doesn't have "trouble reading".. and, all you ever have are insults. Cha Dec 2015 #125
In what manner did Clinton "elbow her way to become president of the Wellesley College.... George II Dec 2015 #130
She was 17 years old. Beacool Dec 2015 #22
Sanders cannot register as a Democrat because there is no such thing in Vermont. merrily Dec 2015 #38
But he could identify as a Democrat like all the other VT Democrats do hack89 Dec 2015 #41
Oh, but he did. merrily Dec 2015 #42
No he most certainly did not dsc Dec 2015 #45
Yes, he did. He's running as a Democrat. It's been in all the papers. Catch up. merrily Dec 2015 #46
His is doing it now dsc Dec 2015 #49
So why is there an "I" next to his name if he has been a Dem forever? nt hack89 Dec 2015 #48
Poster, please. Spare me the silly games. I never said "forever." To the contrary, merrily Dec 2015 #51
But you agree that he could have run in VT as Dem if he wanted to? hack89 Dec 2015 #52
LOL! Vermont Democratic Party nominated him more than once while he ran as an Indie. merrily Dec 2015 #55
"Sanders cannot register as a Democrat because there is no such thing in Vermont." hack89 Dec 2015 #56
Hah? Your question makes no sense. Beyond that, if you have a point, do try to make it. merrily Dec 2015 #58
When did he do that? George II Dec 2015 #131
Please don't be disingenuous. Beacool Dec 2015 #96
Right backatch, beacool. Nothing about stating Vermont law accurately, as I did, is disingenuous. merrily Dec 2015 #98
That may be so, but for years he refused to be considered a Democrat. Beacool Dec 2015 #99
Are you as butt hurt about Lincoln Chafee? merrily Dec 2015 #100
Butt hurt? What a crass remark. Beacool Dec 2015 #104
LOL! and LOL! merrily Dec 2015 #106
And there uis something wrong with Warren being involved and seeing the light? Armstead Dec 2015 #67
There's nothing wrong with Warren becoming a Democrat. Beacool Dec 2015 #97
Sanders supporters are using the same language as that Goldwater pin. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #64
So? Armstead Dec 2015 #68
And Hillary was once a Republican and Bernie NEVER was!!! cascadiance Dec 2015 #108
Can we have some context, oh fearless one? MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #8
Look to the OP's talking about Hillary campaigning with every female Democratic Fearless Dec 2015 #14
Who started the thread pitting one Democrat against another? The motive? seabeyond Dec 2015 #25
Fearless--living up to his or her screen name. The name is right on the OP. merrily Dec 2015 #39
I am not gonna hunt it down, but I believe the thread he is talking about pitting Warren against seabeyond Dec 2015 #50
Isn't that awesome news for Clinton. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #35
I didn't know that. Bernie should just ask Elizabeth to be his VP candidate now. Zorra Dec 2015 #70
No. She should stay in the Senate where she can continue her work. jeff47 Dec 2015 #74
If she helps Bernie win the Presidency, that would be doing more for this country Zorra Dec 2015 #75
There are others who can fulfill that role who are not Senators. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #78
Who would you suggest? Zorra Dec 2015 #81
I don't have "binders full of women" to go through right now. jeff47 Dec 2015 #82
Not This Democrat colsohlibgal Dec 2015 #9
+10000 Docreed2003 Dec 2015 #11
+1000000 SoapBox Dec 2015 #15
Be nice! tazkcmo Dec 2015 #27
I had to get along with only one nanny once. It was hell! merrily Dec 2015 #47
You had a nanny?! Jake Stern Dec 2015 #66
I have sarcasm, but no nanny. merrily Dec 2015 #69
Warren has the zeal of the converted, and I love her for it. Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #127
warren can go where she wants, when she wants, with whom she wants. no probs there nt msongs Dec 2015 #12
I think they will both do just fine without our defense. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #13
Absolutely! eom BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #17
OR, we are Democrats pitting Warren against Clinton. Ya... that would be pathetic. seabeyond Dec 2015 #24
Those who do that are just following the divisives media--the are making riversedge Dec 2015 #28
I do not watch media. I do see who on DU is actively pitting Clinton and Warren though. I do know seabeyond Dec 2015 #32
Just another divisive OP riversedge Dec 2015 #26
I don't get what you mean. I love both of them. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #33
I reject the argument that people who think and vote Democratic are not Dems. msrizzo Dec 2015 #36
This is just a weird OP n/t Godhumor Dec 2015 #37
What does this even mean? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #44
This would make sense if anyone in the "Warren didn't endorse Clinton thread" had criticized her.... brooklynite Dec 2015 #53
Is there a fight? gwheezie Dec 2015 #54
Didn't say that. Fearless Dec 2015 #62
This is silly, blackandwhite thinking. Warren knows there is still progress to be made blm Dec 2015 #60
Democrats come in every stripe. PatrickforO Dec 2015 #61
Why not defend both? Renew Deal Dec 2015 #63
+1 one_voice Dec 2015 #116
I like both of them Skidmore Dec 2015 #73
This Democrat is not defending the woman who claims she represents Wall Street merrily Dec 2015 #79
Hillary Clinton is more of a Democrat than Elizabeth Warren ever will be. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #92
And Hillary was once more of a REPUBLICAN than Bernie EVER WILL BE too! cascadiance Dec 2015 #110
Hillary Clinton was NEVER a Republican. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #112
She was a FRESHMAN IN COLLEGE at Wellesley College where she was president of Young Republicans... cascadiance Dec 2015 #115
BULLSHIT!!!!! MohRokTah Dec 2015 #119
BULLSHIT! She was an ADULT, even if the voting age wasn't lowered yet then!! cascadiance Dec 2015 #132
More bullshit MohRokTah Dec 2015 #133
You are intentionally confusing the laws on VOTING AGE with the AGE OF MAJORITY!!! cascadiance Dec 2015 #134
You are the one confusing the issue. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #135
So, then her REPUBLICAN group that she headed in Wellesley College by your definition was a joke?... cascadiance Dec 2015 #136
Ubnder the law at the time she was STILL A MINOR MohRokTah Dec 2015 #137
Uh, you I guess don't know how to read... cascadiance Dec 2015 #138
Are you surprised? Kermitt Gribble Dec 2015 #94
why do you get hill2016 Dec 2015 #101
Didn't say that. Fearless Dec 2015 #124
Is Warren still running around saying we won't see the TPP language until 4 years after Congress Hoyt Dec 2015 #102
I like both of them. hollowdweller Dec 2015 #114
Who is defending Clinton over Warren? George II Dec 2015 #128
I like Warren, but MaggieD Dec 2015 #139
Not sure what this is about but ecstatic Dec 2015 #140
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Are we democrats defendin...»Reply #83