Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
5. I think soon after the elections are over, you pro-Hillary guys won't be seen on DU again
Tue Dec 15, 2015, 02:54 PM
Dec 2015

for a long time -- maybe until the next election? In the meantime, you are trying to create
as much trouble as you can. And you're not succeeding too well.

hahahahaha....a Clinton Supporter Nontroversy! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #1
Sure. After all, mainstream voters typically chat with friends Hortensis Dec 2015 #99
They are too busy UglyGreed Dec 2015 #2
I think soon after the elections are over, you pro-Hillary guys won't be seen on DU again Cal33 Dec 2015 #5
There are an awful lot of accounts that were idle between 2008 and now. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #9
What election is that? upaloopa Dec 2015 #11
Good to hear!!! UglyGreed Dec 2015 #44
+1 Bubzer Dec 2015 #46
Childish 40RatRod Dec 2015 #62
+1 peacebird Dec 2015 #152
Yes, too busy not putting on bumper stickers, not Tweeting, not talking on Facebook... reformist2 Dec 2015 #115
Maybe her greatness UglyGreed Dec 2015 #126
Think about it: what is there to be enthusiastic about? senz Dec 2015 #128
it doesnt match up! retrowire Dec 2015 #147
The vast,vast majority of voters don't do any sufrommich Dec 2015 #3
Here is your "not much effort" upaloopa Dec 2015 #15
I think most Hillary voters think she'll win the primary. sufrommich Dec 2015 #20
Of fucking course they do....as anyone VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #114
Paid operatives. wilsonbooks Dec 2015 #130
Exactly. She has WallStreet, Bernie has Main street. There arr more voters than bankers! peacebird Dec 2015 #153
Certainly that copy and paste wasn't much effort at all! n/t RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #155
It was no effort at all upaloopa Dec 2015 #158
Clinton cannot defeat the RepubliCONs RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #159
It is pretty presumptuous of you to think you can speak upaloopa Dec 2015 #160
I know and work with MANY of them. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #161
I am married to one. upaloopa Dec 2015 #162
Why that is HassleCat Dec 2015 #4
Polls are always to be taken with a grain of salt, The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2015 #6
Grass roots types like Senator Sanders. They view him as the real deal. demmiblue Dec 2015 #7
I don't get the love of on line polls by upaloopa Dec 2015 #8
I suspect Bernie's mass rallies have stopped because sufrommich Dec 2015 #16
it's actually because he's stopped hosting them retrowire Dec 2015 #38
Why did he stop hosting them? nt sufrommich Dec 2015 #41
Because no matter how popular you are, you can't pull crowds that size non-stop Kentonio Dec 2015 #56
Bingo! Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #60
it's believed to be apart of his budget strategy. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #59
They aren't meaningless. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #19
Agreed. tecelote Dec 2015 #52
The difference between online polls and statistical sample is this: Bubzer Dec 2015 #40
Online polls are very easy to manipulate hack89 Dec 2015 #61
Well, if one side votes and the otherside does not, it non-voters as not being energized. Bubzer Dec 2015 #64
No hack89 Dec 2015 #68
Your argument is a non sequiter...I didn't say that all likly voters participated in the online vote Bubzer Dec 2015 #71
But not voting in on line polls says nothing about voter enthusiasm either. nt hack89 Dec 2015 #73
You're wrong about that. Enthusiasm breeds participation. There's a VERY strong connection there. Bubzer Dec 2015 #75
You would have to provide some studies on that hack89 Dec 2015 #79
You still seem to be operating under your non sequiter... Try this; Bubzer Dec 2015 #119
It is your conclusions about those that do not participate in online polls I question hack89 Dec 2015 #123
I understand. I disagree. Bubzer Dec 2015 #127
You have never studied statistics upaloopa Dec 2015 #81
Yes a scientific poll is an educated guess. Anyone claiming otherwise is selling somthing. Bubzer Dec 2015 #106
I use to tutor statistics upaloopa Dec 2015 #107
Bully for you! Statistical theory is a great field of study. But, your still wrong. Bubzer Dec 2015 #112
You "use" to? senz Dec 2015 #132
I wasn't going to say anything. Bubzer Dec 2015 #134
I normally don't either senz Dec 2015 #138
May it stay that way! Bubzer Dec 2015 #139
I was taught this in statistics class a long time ago. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #157
You don't know what people have and have not studied. senz Dec 2015 #129
About those land-line polls passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #51
Give me a freaking break. Phlem Dec 2015 #78
I clicked online for Kerry over a thousand times redstateblues Dec 2015 #109
Not statistical samples... RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #156
Stop with the critical thinking, citizen! She is winning and it is your duty to vote for her! (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #10
So the polling companies don't know what they are doing hack89 Dec 2015 #12
Yes - since you asked. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #21
We will see hack89 Dec 2015 #22
wow, I think that information is out of date. corkhead Dec 2015 #26
We have a landline, but it is really Skype. And we screen calls automatically so that if the JDPriestly Dec 2015 #67
We screen all of our calls. If we don't know someone, the phone probably will not even ring JDPriestly Dec 2015 #63
Given that the poll results vary by 10-15 points, I *would* say that a lot of them must be wrong! reformist2 Dec 2015 #116
That's why I go to 528 to get the lowdown on what polls are good ones. Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #125
Her rallies were small compared to Obama's firebrand80 Dec 2015 #13
Obama ALSO had better poll numbers than Sanders. wildeyed Dec 2015 #65
Supporters of an underdog always have to be more active than MineralMan Dec 2015 #14
Oh stop, you're talking reality and sense again. Hekate Dec 2015 #17
I just can't help myself, for some reason. MineralMan Dec 2015 #18
Four months! You must look like a wild man! Nay Dec 2015 #28
On another website which I will not mention, MineralMan Dec 2015 #32
Thank you, MM Chitown Kev Dec 2015 #25
this is a good answer thank you. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #37
"DU is Confirmation-bias Central" Number23 Dec 2015 #53
Thanks very much for your comment! MineralMan Dec 2015 #54
Your in the ballpark angrychair Dec 2015 #111
People vote or they do not. MineralMan Dec 2015 #120
If only MM angrychair Dec 2015 #121
I still manage to register some new voters in MineralMan Dec 2015 #122
I agree angrychair Dec 2015 #124
on my ignore list corkhead Dec 2015 #23
Rally #'s show a Bernie peak. Agschmid Dec 2015 #24
That only makes any sense if he was holding rallies and not filling them.. Kentonio Dec 2015 #57
I'm right here. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #27
I'd say your analogy is flawed... brooklynite Dec 2015 #29
Against, nobody has said "inevitable" or "landslide" brooklynite Dec 2015 #30
Hillary supporters can't multitask? retrowire Dec 2015 #36
No, more the "this is a waste of time" idea... brooklynite Dec 2015 #39
yep retrowire Dec 2015 #43
I see - "do something pointless; it'll only take a minute" brooklynite Dec 2015 #47
Working. Like I am right now. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #31
so Hillary supporters cant multitask? retrowire Dec 2015 #35
HRC supporters NOT bothering with on-line polls ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #133
Well time will tell won't it? MoonRiver Dec 2015 #33
Here's one SCantiGOP Dec 2015 #34
Confirmation bias? wildeyed Dec 2015 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #45
DU is fun. MineralMan Dec 2015 #48
DU does not reflect the Democratic Party or the real world Gothmog Dec 2015 #49
I just got off a lawyers for Hillary call Gothmog Dec 2015 #50
But that was a call with real people, actually engaged with the campaign brooklynite Dec 2015 #74
I have already been working with people on the legal team Gothmog Dec 2015 #76
My annoyance with things like this is that they usually insist that you BE a lawyer... brooklynite Dec 2015 #80
Actually, I love non-lawyers and others to be poll watchers Gothmog Dec 2015 #82
I have no desire to login with my facebook, twitter, or email giftedgirl77 Dec 2015 #55
Everyone I know is a Sanders supporter Prism Dec 2015 #58
see post #110 redstateblues Dec 2015 #113
No, I know Prism Dec 2015 #117
they're saying the Sandersonians are too mean so they're all leaving DU MisterP Dec 2015 #66
I've thought and argued that the 3rdway types stupidicus Dec 2015 #69
I hope he does get DFA's endorsement. Duval Dec 2015 #70
Here rtracey Dec 2015 #72
The Sanders progressive purity patrol taught_me_patience Dec 2015 #77
Just like the Hillary moderate purity patrol. senz Dec 2015 #135
I work two jobs. Starry Messenger Dec 2015 #83
"But it's more accessible than phone polls." NCTraveler Dec 2015 #84
easy. retrowire Dec 2015 #85
A little deeper. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #86
nope, that's as deep as it gets. retrowire Dec 2015 #87
LOL.....so that means what exactly? Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #89
it means what it says LOL. retrowire Dec 2015 #92
"the internet is more accessible than landing on a call list and receiving a phone call" Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #95
whooshed over your head apparently. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #97
You fail to understand the significance of a random sample. Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #98
really? retrowire Dec 2015 #101
Then the problem seems to be your understanding of statistics. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #94
annnd Hillary isn't getting the same kind of support because??? retrowire Dec 2015 #96
Because many of her supporters aren't as... NCTraveler Dec 2015 #100
this is true. retrowire Dec 2015 #102
See post 94. Nt NCTraveler Dec 2015 #103
See post 101. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #104
I suspect DFA will not release the numbers. PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #88
well they'll still endorse the majority leader. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #90
Maybe. PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #91
yeah i noticed that. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #93
Clinton suffers from a huge enthusiasm gap. This might bite her in the ass in Iowa. Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #105
I have warned Hillary supporters of complacency retrowire Dec 2015 #108
Crazy! Everyone I knew at the time enthusiastically voted for McGovern redstateblues Dec 2015 #110
So the Democrats should have nominated Maggie Thatcher to run against Nixon? Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #118
It's nothing but in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #131
And, I just noticed something huge.... retrowire Dec 2015 #137
The buzz all over the internet, Facebook, and Twitter is for Bernie, not Hillary. senz Dec 2015 #136
And when Republican online polls match their pundit polls... retrowire Dec 2015 #140
Exactly. Bernie owns the Internet, SO in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #142
K & R ! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #141
The similarities are because ... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #143
but clearly republicans arent the underdogs retrowire Dec 2015 #144
Actually, the Republicans *are* the underdogs. Clearly. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #145
oh boy retrowire Dec 2015 #146
They're both longshot underdogs. Neither one will become president. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #148
it explains why she's doing so well in pundit polls retrowire Dec 2015 #149
I guess you haven't seen all her union endorsements ... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #150
endorsements aren't votes retrowire Dec 2015 #151
Neither are online polls. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #154
Because MadDAsHell Dec 2015 #163
it's not embarrassing retrowire Dec 2015 #164
I know very few supporters of any of the DEM candidates, IRL bigwillq Dec 2015 #165
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I know the DU is only a p...»Reply #5