Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Can someone please explain to me the difference between: [View all]randys1
(16,286 posts)16. I feel for the OP, the sad thing about all this is actual liberals are scared to death
that 2010 could repeat.
You know those folks who complained that Obama hadnt accomplished anything so they wouldnt vote in 2010, I saw the posts right here in the last few days, those folks might do it again.
Now granted, some arent liberals or dems in the first place and are here solely to sow discord and convince people not to vote, but those who think they are liberals who say absurd shit like Hillary is a con or is the same as them
might withold their vote if she is the nominee.
The result would be the teaparty in control of absolutely everything including the SC.
Translation, if you are Black, Gay, Asian, Latino, Jewish, Muslim, or Brown from anywhere on earth, RUN LIKE HELL!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
175 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What part of "It's NOT a smear to tell the truth" did you not understand? nt
99th_Monkey
Dec 2015
#26
I feel for the OP, the sad thing about all this is actual liberals are scared to death
randys1
Dec 2015
#16
No, I think a smear is something designed to make someone look bad without any particular relevance
Cary
Dec 2015
#39
Nobody on the left would ever criticize Hillary in respect to running for WH without including
randys1
Dec 2015
#18
So I'm confused. Are you saying that Clinton is not allowed to be criticized
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2015
#20
You know exactly what I mean, you have seen the hundreds, possibly thousands of not posts
randys1
Dec 2015
#25
How do you define a conservative smear? Your question cannot be answered with that definition.
arcane1
Dec 2015
#23
Google puts it in reagan's mouth. Oh well, either way it's a con artist strategy
Scootaloo
Dec 2015
#65
Oh please, the criticism of Hillary here is nothing compared to the nasty smears against Bernie.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#76
So it's okay for you to smear all of us without proof but you don't want to be associated with them?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#86
"Go find someone else to troll." Funny, that's what we've been telling you.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#89
I haven't seen an elbow drop like that since Wrestlemania III - well done! nt.
Juicy_Bellows
Dec 2015
#98
"What on earth are you babbling about?"* We're asking you the same thing.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#111
'in there with you in that head?'* You're the one talking to yourself.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#116
Yes, chamomile is good although my mom used to make a nice mint tea.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#119
Someone already alerted on one of my posts where all I did was repeat the op's own words.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#151
This is the very first of these particular pissing matches that I have been sucked into
Cary
Dec 2015
#161
If you can't figure that one out on your own, there's no use explaining the difference
Armstead
Dec 2015
#91
If someone at DU has policy differences with the Clinton Campaign and expresses them here,
guillaumeb
Dec 2015
#101
Big picture people dont see the differences between Bernie and HIllary and exploit
randys1
Dec 2015
#129
I posted a video of her speech from CSPAN and was accused of editing it.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#158