Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Knowing what I know about software, I bet all 3 campaigns had cross access to all data for that time phleshdef Dec 2015 #1
It was all trackable so if anyone ever accesses anything there's a record. moobu2 Dec 2015 #6
Bernie doesn't NEED to lie about anything. phleshdef Dec 2015 #13
Not if you use the chance to acess and copy my very expensive personal information moobu2 Dec 2015 #22
I guarantee if your emails showed up in my inbox and I read them, you couldn't do anything to me. phleshdef Dec 2015 #29
That's not the analogy... brooklynite Dec 2015 #50
from what I understand d_r Dec 2015 #60
For one, I'm not just making an analogy, I'm explaining exactly the logical thing that happened. phleshdef Dec 2015 #61
No... Agschmid Dec 2015 #27
But who controls the access??? UglyGreed Dec 2015 #19
.... questionseverything Dec 2015 #23
Winner, winner UglyGreed Dec 2015 #24
Nothing to see here Mnpaul Dec 2015 #70
Yeah lets check the trail Bernies workinclasszero Dec 2015 #28
You know nothing about software. Nothing is "trackable" when you have root permission. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #41
This long-time IT veteran says you're exactly correct. Scuba Dec 2015 #66
And who has the tracking log? N/t DVRacer Dec 2015 #73
The DWS/DNC/Hillary Camp is one and the same NowSam Dec 2015 #2
All access to the data is trackable so no Hillary does not have access. moobu2 Dec 2015 #3
Tracked by whom? arcane1 Dec 2015 #5
Well exactly Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #67
when the founder of the 3rd party vendor was Clinton's 2008 IT director? Jarqui Dec 2015 #10
Wasn't this also the firm that was responsible for Clinton's private email? EndElectoral Dec 2015 #16
Holy moly! Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #69
You don't actually know that, because a complete audit has not been run. jeff47 Dec 2015 #12
You don't understand the difference between having access and using access apparently. phleshdef Dec 2015 #14
You know nothing about software. Nothing is "trackable" when you have root permission. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #40
Just make it up as you go. Not a bit to back up what you say. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #4
DWS/DNC works for Clinton. The vendor hired by DWS/DNC worked for Clinton. mhatrw Dec 2015 #42
Keeps getting better and better. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #48
Endorsements matter? As in corporate and establishment insiders who are willing to cheat and lie? mhatrw Dec 2015 #59
Are your WMDs right next to your massive tinfoil supply? Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #7
Is that what Hillary said when she voted to invade Iraq? nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #44
Great snark! +1 n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #64
They all had access... Happenstance24 Dec 2015 #8
^^^ This. Though "stolen" is not an accurate term. phleshdef Dec 2015 #15
Would someone who wanted to steal data always tell they were taking data? We need an audit. EndElectoral Dec 2015 #20
I've gotten into the habit of putting low-post-count posters who show up to bash Sanders Maedhros Dec 2015 #43
Creating for divisiveness on DU. Not needed. riversedge Dec 2015 #9
Just because the vendor is owned by someone who's worked closely with the Clintons jeff47 Dec 2015 #11
Vendor works on most campaigns, even Obama's. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #21
.... questionseverything Dec 2015 #26
The vendor is Clinton's go to IT person. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #46
Tin Foil hats all around! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #32
Conspiracy! DanTex Dec 2015 #17
Yes, I believe Hillary is running a great campaign. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #18
Of course they did and they had it in October when Bernie's campaign alerted the DNC. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #25
got proof of that? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #31
Just logic, if the firewall is down it goes both ways Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #35
that won't hold water dude..its theoretical VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #36
The question in the OP was "access" not download, don't be moving the goal posts. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #37
Now its about Downloading them huh? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #56
Did you not read your own post #36, you used the term "downloading" that's what I was Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #57
Yes...if you open a document on your computer... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #58
Accessing it....and downloading and saving it.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #30
... SidDithers Dec 2015 #33
EXACTLY! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #34
This is getting more and more entertaining treestar Dec 2015 #39
Kicketty Kickin' Faux pas Dec 2015 #38
Well, of course we're going to believe whatever assists us in rationalizing LanternWaste Dec 2015 #45
TOS: Don't go overboard with the crazy talk. brooklynite Dec 2015 #47
Yes, but this is Bernie Underground Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #52
We have two camps on this thread. People who know a duck when they see it walk & hear it quack mhatrw Dec 2015 #49
Does anyone not believe that Sander's campaign just got caught stealing data? nt Nitram Dec 2015 #51
You can see that it's an almost 50/50 split Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #53
Which means 50% accept the facts and 50% are in denial. nt Nitram Dec 2015 #54
Pretty much Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #55
I just posted an OP with some details regarding this if anyones interested. bobbobbins01 Dec 2015 #62
Give us a link, please. mhatrw Dec 2015 #65
I have NO doubt that DWS would do ANYTHING or HRC's coronation. n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #63
They definitely had the access during the 40 minute window. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #68
Don't you usually need evidence before you make big claims, or even little claims? BlueCheese Dec 2015 #71
LOL. A Clinton staffer wrote the program and has full unfettered access to the database! nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #72
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does anyone here actually...»Reply #9