Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here actually believe that DNClinton does not have full access rights to Sanders' data? [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)11. Just because the vendor is owned by someone who's worked closely with the Clintons
since 1992, and the current CEO was Clinton 2008's CTO?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does anyone here actually believe that DNClinton does not have full access rights to Sanders' data? [View all]
mhatrw
Dec 2015
OP
Knowing what I know about software, I bet all 3 campaigns had cross access to all data for that time
phleshdef
Dec 2015
#1
Not if you use the chance to acess and copy my very expensive personal information
moobu2
Dec 2015
#22
I guarantee if your emails showed up in my inbox and I read them, you couldn't do anything to me.
phleshdef
Dec 2015
#29
For one, I'm not just making an analogy, I'm explaining exactly the logical thing that happened.
phleshdef
Dec 2015
#61
You know nothing about software. Nothing is "trackable" when you have root permission. nt
mhatrw
Dec 2015
#41
Wasn't this also the firm that was responsible for Clinton's private email?
EndElectoral
Dec 2015
#16
You don't understand the difference between having access and using access apparently.
phleshdef
Dec 2015
#14
You know nothing about software. Nothing is "trackable" when you have root permission. nt
mhatrw
Dec 2015
#40
Endorsements matter? As in corporate and establishment insiders who are willing to cheat and lie?
mhatrw
Dec 2015
#59
Would someone who wanted to steal data always tell they were taking data? We need an audit.
EndElectoral
Dec 2015
#20
I've gotten into the habit of putting low-post-count posters who show up to bash Sanders
Maedhros
Dec 2015
#43
Just because the vendor is owned by someone who's worked closely with the Clintons
jeff47
Dec 2015
#11
Of course they did and they had it in October when Bernie's campaign alerted the DNC.
Uncle Joe
Dec 2015
#25
The question in the OP was "access" not download, don't be moving the goal posts.
Uncle Joe
Dec 2015
#37
Did you not read your own post #36, you used the term "downloading" that's what I was
Uncle Joe
Dec 2015
#57
Well, of course we're going to believe whatever assists us in rationalizing
LanternWaste
Dec 2015
#45
We have two camps on this thread. People who know a duck when they see it walk & hear it quack
mhatrw
Dec 2015
#49
Does anyone not believe that Sander's campaign just got caught stealing data? nt
Nitram
Dec 2015
#51
I just posted an OP with some details regarding this if anyones interested.
bobbobbins01
Dec 2015
#62
Don't you usually need evidence before you make big claims, or even little claims?
BlueCheese
Dec 2015
#71