2016 Postmortem

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)

32. I agree.

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 03:04 AM

Dec 2015

I posted that up thread before you did.

And that's why in the other thread I said that DWS was made to blink and that if she really had the power to she would've taken it straight to the courts and fought the injunction. You called that "imaginative" in the other thread.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Friday night's agreement doesn't end the lawsuit, according to a Sanders aide. [View all] catnhatnh Dec 2015 OP

Nor does it end the independent investigation. leftofcool Dec 2015 #1

Let's hope not.... daleanime Dec 2015 #6

Sanders does not look good using a party while trashing, to use their resources, then put so much seabeyond Dec 2015 #2

Bernie looks bad??? catnhatnh Dec 2015 #5

Yes, theft looks bad leftofcool Dec 2015 #9

And your candidate and the head of the DNC catnhatnh Dec 2015 #15

So Bernie steals and it's Hillary's fault? Got it! leftofcool Dec 2015 #20

Try reading for comprehension catnhatnh Dec 2015 #22

I say we let the justice department review it and make a decision leftofcool Dec 2015 #25

Yes. Let's get a full independent audit of the data security protocol. tecelote Dec 2015 #51

Lets let the Discovery evidence safeinOhio Dec 2015 #63

Try not making up bullshit ConservativeDemocrat Dec 2015 #62

You'd be ok with turning over all safeinOhio Dec 2015 #64

Conspiracy theorizing is a sign of derangement, you know ConservativeDemocrat Dec 2015 #65

You got it. safeinOhio Dec 2015 #66

So the penalty for the Sanders campaign stealing private data... ConservativeDemocrat Dec 2015 #67

Nothing was stolen jfern Dec 2015 #55

Collusion was only in your mind. I can't help you with that. Ya, stealing data and threatening 600k seabeyond Dec 2015 #11

god, bernie is showing backbone and taking care of us his followers. roguevalley Dec 2015 #53

Well Hillary inappropriately accessed and stole President Obama's data in 2008 notadmblnd Dec 2015 #8

That's not going to happen mindwalker_i Dec 2015 #16

And they gave the DNC all the info and cooperated fully thelordofhell Dec 2015 #54

Sanders caucused with the Democratic party for years Samantha Dec 2015 #18

stealing money donated? grasswire Dec 2015 #26

Hey... you... Fawke Em Dec 2015 #44

Yes. tecelote Dec 2015 #56

Muchas Gracias. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #59

Buenas noches. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #61

Pls remember, all: yr enemy can defeat you by causing you to waste your time. snot Dec 2015 #57

Team Sanders obviously can prove they warned the DNC about the firewall months ago. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #3

I was wondering why a part of the agreement was not Sanders dropping the suit Samantha Dec 2015 #4

It was clear that the court would grant the petition for injunctive relief. Hepburn Dec 2015 #7

The DNC has the justice department. leftofcool Dec 2015 #12

Nice to have you admit predjudice! Fawke Em Dec 2015 #45

Already took a screen shot of this! Fawke Em Dec 2015 #46

Well, yeah, the court would've said... joshcryer Dec 2015 #13

I have never seen a ruling or opinion that merely stated, "Act like adults." Hepburn Dec 2015 #19

That is not clear. joshcryer Dec 2015 #24

IMO, the DNC does need a working over to get rid of the coronation theme. Hepburn Dec 2015 #27

"couldn't trust the Sanders campaign to keep the data secure"... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #68

...and little Debbie aspirant Dec 2015 #21

Yes, I know that - I read the documents as soon as they were posted Samantha Dec 2015 #75

Also just look up-thread to see why.... daleanime Dec 2015 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author KingFlorez Dec 2015 #14

Good. It's time to hang up all the DNC's laundry. pa28 Dec 2015 #17

Then they are truly idiots. RandySF Dec 2015 #23

Good. They will lose Renew Deal Dec 2015 #28

That's what DWS used as her justification for cutting off the campaign. joshcryer Dec 2015 #30

It gives them the flexibility they need to protect the data. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #31

I agree. joshcryer Dec 2015 #32

The part I got hung up on was the stern talking to. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #33

Well, DWS pulled the trigger. joshcryer Dec 2015 #34

if there was a snowballs chance in hell, DWS would have fought this roguevalley Dec 2015 #58

They have a case. joshcryer Dec 2015 #60

Weaver did great... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #71

Reading comprehension is fundamental. Hepburn Dec 2015 #35

"all measures necessary" is boilerplate. joshcryer Dec 2015 #38

The remedies are spelled out with particularity and the DNC did something that was not within Hepburn Dec 2015 #39

The contract was not terminated. joshcryer Dec 2015 #41

Well DWS had an opportunity to go to court... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #73

From a strictly data protection angle... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #72

That seems pretty dispositive to me. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #36

Here is a link to the lawsuit Renew Deal Dec 2015 #37

Page 16 of the link Renew Deal posted: joshcryer Dec 2015 #40

Thanks. Found it. It's in the Confidentiality subparagraph. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #42

Apparently the damages were put in to make it Federal. joshcryer Dec 2015 #43

A terrible suit that kicked your ass. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #48

No, a suit that threatens Sanders' campaign. joshcryer Dec 2015 #49

Yes, yes and yes. nt SunSeeker Dec 2015 #50

The "time" thing. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #47

IF they cut off access to everyone... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #69

Good. F#(% DWS and the DNC. PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #29

I hope he brings down DWS jfern Dec 2015 #52

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #70

a Mighty Wind reddread Dec 2015 #74

Let's petition the court to televise the case on C-SPAN !! Jarqui Dec 2015 #76