Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Friday night's agreement doesn't end the lawsuit, according to a Sanders aide. [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)72. From a strictly data protection angle...
...denying one campaign access to the data, while allowing others to continue accessing it, would not be effective.
Denying only the Sanders campaign was clearly done in response to the breach by Sanders staffers. But the contract clearly states they are required to give 10 days' notice to correct issues. There was no notice given, and the action taken did not serve to protect the data. So that argument does not fly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Friday night's agreement doesn't end the lawsuit, according to a Sanders aide. [View all]
catnhatnh
Dec 2015
OP
Sanders does not look good using a party while trashing, to use their resources, then put so much
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#2
Collusion was only in your mind. I can't help you with that. Ya, stealing data and threatening 600k
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#11
Well Hillary inappropriately accessed and stole President Obama's data in 2008
notadmblnd
Dec 2015
#8
Team Sanders obviously can prove they warned the DNC about the firewall months ago.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#3