2016 Postmortem

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)

22. In perspective that's nothing compared to the 16 million children living in poverty and another

Wed Dec 23, 2015, 08:06 PM

Dec 2015

16 million living in low income homes. Supporting the billionaire's candidate will not change that. They are all about profits and that means more poverty. The only reasons I can imagine for supporting the Oligarchy is 1. the worship of the wealthy or 2. total denial that there are children going to bed hungry.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2016 New Hampshire Democratic Presidential Primary - Clinton 46%, Sanders 43% (ARG) [View all] Dem2 Dec 2015 OP

Go Team Hillary! leftofcool Dec 2015 #1

If you want to see something done about the 16 million American children living in poverty rhett o rick Dec 2015 #14

the bernie team sabotaged their own campaign when they downloaded Hillary's data. Cha Dec 2015 #19

In perspective that's nothing compared to the 16 million children living in poverty and another rhett o rick Dec 2015 #22

Hoisted on their own petard.. what a shame. Cha Dec 2015 #23

Gloat while you can, but sooner or later the People will over through the Oligarchy rhett o rick Dec 2015 #24

You're gloating. Cha Dec 2015 #26

We want to help those living in poverty, those seniors depending on Social Security and Medicare, rhett o rick Dec 2015 #30

Well, If You Are So Firm In Your Position Then I Imagine That You Are for A Full And COMPLETE CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #34

It's not a matter of my "position" .. those are the facts. Cha Dec 2015 #42

I recall ARG not being a good pollster firebrand80 Dec 2015 #2

No, they're terrible Godhumor Dec 2015 #4

So Clinton COULD BE ahead by 10 percentage points or more. Hoyt Dec 2015 #5

Well sure, but ARG missed in 2008 by vastly overstating HRC support though Godhumor Dec 2015 #10

I believe you are correct. leftofcool Dec 2015 #8

I don't think that's likely firebrand80 Dec 2015 #12

We'll see won't we? Cha Dec 2015 #20

It also could mean madokie Dec 2015 #37

American Research Group has a C- rating from Nate Silver Samantha Dec 2015 #45

Clinton is not resting in any way. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #3

We may not totally agree on politics, but that's a cool hashtag. libdem4life Dec 2015 #6

#feelthebern NCTraveler Dec 2015 #7

Lips sealed. LOL libdem4life Dec 2015 #11

#hillNO #anybodybuthillary peacebird Dec 2015 #28

Happy Holidays. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #29

Our holiday has already passed, but thanks! peacebird Dec 2015 #31

I sure hope they are right. msrizzo Dec 2015 #9

Hillary keeps workin' it like she's 20 points behind! Cha Dec 2015 #21

Yep, Prevaricating Her Ars Off! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #35

So says a BS fan.. that means less than nothing. Cha Dec 2015 #43

Clinton will almost certainly lose NH. Codeine Dec 2015 #13

NH is one of the few states that Bernie can win. Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #15

Hubris! n/t RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #17

How many states does the US have again? JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #33

Bernie should win VT, NH, ME, WI, UT. Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #44

Oh I see. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #46

Another poll that seems to have favorable demographics for Clinton Jarqui Dec 2015 #16

If you ask 600 Hillary supporters then those numbers might be correct litlbilly Dec 2015 #18

Personally, I do think Clinton will do a sweep. But. NH and a couple little ones like Utah my go seabeyond Dec 2015 #25

I agree there is some ass kicking going on madokie Dec 2015 #38

Facts vs Hope. I can live with that. Nt. seabeyond Dec 2015 #39

Awesome! Go Bernie! FeelTheBern! peacebird Dec 2015 #27

+/- 4% Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #32

By Definition, The Sampling CANNOT Be Random CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #36

yes Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #40

What's with the random caps? rjsquirrel Dec 2015 #41

Such Bull Shit. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #47

NH is a difficult state to poll acurately. DCBob Dec 2015 #48

Yes, it is Dem2 Dec 2015 #49