Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
2. Jury Results
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 10:53 AM
Dec 2015

On Sun Dec 27, 2015, 09:43 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

I've uncovered a huge Scandal...Bernie Sanders is a DNC plant!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251949809

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Fair is fair. A post, similar to this, designed ONLY to slime and cause flame was hidden today sending a long time DU'er into privileges revoked. Lets be fair and honest then and hide this as well. It is nothing but lowly slime.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Dec 27, 2015, 09:51 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think this maybe laking its sarcasm tag? Otherwise this reads as a snarcky attack. Sorry to have to hide for the disrespectful tone.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerting on posts isn't supposed to be used for revenge. Alerter admits that this alert is exactly that. Leave.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I didn't see the original hidden post, so I can't compare the two.
I was ready to hide this one until the end when I finally understood the poster's intentions. I as well, am sick of conspiracy theories.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
?? Io1989 Dec 2015 #1
Try these... brooklynite Dec 2015 #5
Jury Results rbrnmw Dec 2015 #2
Seriously? BooScout Dec 2015 #13
yes they did rbrnmw Dec 2015 #16
Is that considered abuse of the system? Is it allowed? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #22
It is an abuse. okasha Dec 2015 #54
Alerted on? MoonRiver Dec 2015 #18
Juror #2 Plucketeer Dec 2015 #32
"Fair is fair. A post, similar to this, designed ONLY to slime and cause flame was hidden today Cha Dec 2015 #40
The usual funeral thread okasha Dec 2015 #42
So does that mean there was no post where the OP was PPRed?! Cha Dec 2015 #43
it doesn't appear to be true rbrnmw Dec 2015 #47
Imagine that! An alerter LYING AGAIN to get the JURY to Bend to their Way. Abuse of the Jury Cha Dec 2015 #50
Not lying TSIAS Dec 2015 #58
"privileges revoked" is a lie.. and revenge is not a valid arguement for an alert. Cha Dec 2015 #59
Getting into semantics TSIAS Dec 2015 #60
Uh huh.. it was a bogus alert for Revenge.. good thing the majority saw through it. 1-6 LEAVE. Cha Dec 2015 #61
Another longer termer got banned? one_voice Dec 2015 #44
The alerter was confused clearly, and sent a frivolous alert. Agschmid Dec 2015 #49
Oh no I wasn't suggesting we did... one_voice Dec 2015 #51
Yup. Agschmid Dec 2015 #52
Don't quit your day job. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #3
Are you suggesting that the seminal poster is lacking as a writer? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2015 #10
Hardly a seminal poster as you assert. Wilms Dec 2015 #12
It's actually MrChuck Dec 2015 #27
So much for Dictionary.com Wilms Dec 2015 #34
Actually, they're both correct. bvf Dec 2015 #36
Perhaps a plethora of pablum-like perspicaciousness? Katashi_itto Dec 2015 #57
Why, certainly, my good fellow, you may bvf Dec 2015 #15
WTF does this even mean? nt Logical Dec 2015 #41
What part of my remarks require elucidation? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2015 #46
LOL, thesaurus man! No idea is you are serious half the time. nt Logical Dec 2015 #48
yep, it's similar too but not to be confused with those who profusely use words not in common usage stupidicus Dec 2015 #17
Perfect. bvf Dec 2015 #19
And what 'big words' are giving you problems? randome Dec 2015 #20
who said any did? stupidicus Dec 2015 #26
It always amazes me how some can't see sarcasm unless there's a tag at the bottom of the post. randome Dec 2015 #4
Sarcasm? I thought it was a run-through for open-mic night. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #6
What? Wilms Dec 2015 #7
Waste of words,. daybranch Dec 2015 #8
so Bernie Sanders works for the DNC . stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #9
Waiting for Goodman to confirm. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #11
How Do You "FIRE" A Candidate??? ChiciB1 Dec 2015 #14
If only that unnamed Sander campaign advisor would come forward he could put this all to bed... Historic NY Dec 2015 #21
LOL! Laser102 Dec 2015 #30
*yawn* - more tone-deaf mocking of genuine concerns. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #23
This OP reminds me of a TWM OP; its a Farce. DhhD Dec 2015 #24
That's it! I'm boycotting this thread! Helen Borg Dec 2015 #25
That conspiracy makes about as much sense as treestar Dec 2015 #28
It was the DNC who told New Hampshire to let Sanders on the ballot Gothmog Dec 2015 #29
Now it all makes sense. I was wondering and now I know. Wow. BS is a DNC plant. That explains it. Laser102 Dec 2015 #31
Ah, leave the 'cleverness' to someone else. earthside Dec 2015 #33
I KNOW WHERE THE TRUE PLANT IS retrowire Dec 2015 #35
Clearly some Sanders supporters are now in the third stage of grief. Gman Dec 2015 #37
It might be worse than we fear. Vinca Dec 2015 #38
"Failure to win"???? Win What? concreteblue Dec 2015 #39
Insurmountable? Fawke Em Dec 2015 #55
It makes as much sense as josh uretsky being a "dnc plant". IOW.. zero Cha Dec 2015 #45
You know once the reddi-whip can is empty you're supposed to throw it away, right? n/t Scootaloo Dec 2015 #53
Randall Terry postatomic Dec 2015 #56
Want some real comedy gold? AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #62
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I've uncovered a huge Sca...»Reply #2