Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Waiting for the obligatory "The Times is part of the MSM/in the tank for Clinton" post brooklynite Dec 2015 #1
This is the best you can throw at him? tecelote Dec 2015 #3
I entirely agree... brooklynite Dec 2015 #5
The Polls Are ALL BS and Cannot By Definition Be Random Given The Structural Change in Means of CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #39
Malarky.... reACTIONary Dec 2015 #48
Let's review the ignorance... brooklynite Dec 2015 #52
no stolen elections in our history reddread Dec 2015 #96
None that I'm aware of brooklynite Dec 2015 #101
three dollar bill reddread Dec 2015 #105
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #100
No one called this a scandal RandySF Dec 2015 #26
There is a faction in Bernie's floriduck Dec 2015 #8
I don't doubt that one bit. A lot of people want to go for her jugular. Not just a small Hiraeth Dec 2015 #30
Damn right a little friction is healthy.. Used to be a major trait of the Dem party.... raindaddy Dec 2015 #47
And a tendency to be afraid of not conforming Voice for Peace Dec 2015 #88
And instead you get what, you've never seen politics before? Let's do a quick review! Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #10
Interesting how the Clinton fans used to disparage the Corp-Media and now have switched rhett o rick Dec 2015 #15
Well, the Times did pimp the self-same war she sold out the Iraqi KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #44
I know you didn't mean this but this post reads like a throwaway line to me Depaysement Dec 2015 #50
I knew after 30 minutes of research and reading that Bush's claims of KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #55
You were faster than I was. pangaia Dec 2015 #60
She "whored" herself out? Nonhlanhla Dec 2015 #54
Hillbots clearly have problems with the metaphoric use KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #58
I am as strong a Bernie supporter as you will find, but I agree. pangaia Dec 2015 #61
oh, all right. Does 'sold out' pass muster? - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #63
Sure. pangaia Dec 2015 #64
Done. Thanks for the nudge. - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #66
Wow, You did change it. pangaia Dec 2015 #69
So I'm shrill? Nonhlanhla Dec 2015 #75
It is along the same lines that Bernie uses and then claims it was not mysoginistic. Sheepshank Dec 2015 #86
Why no quotes? n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #2
LOL - I wouldn't be surprised if BOTH campaigns nc4bo Dec 2015 #4
This. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #16
yep SNAFU all over the place. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #31
From the link: Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #6
And why won't hill2016 Dec 2015 #7
Just my opinion but why risk DNC repurcussions and debate without her? Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #9
And that hill2016 Dec 2015 #18
I agree with that. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #22
There is "no upside" to Sanders debating O'Malley. And what is the upside for Hillary pnwmom Dec 2015 #73
Because then the DNC may ban him from debating Hillary. Luminous Animal Dec 2015 #21
MOM Need sto Man Up and Drop Out! For AMERICA! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #40
Why waste time and energy on a debate that does not include the frontrunner? passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #45
Isn't Uponthegears Dec 2015 #51
Why should he debate O'Malley alone? O'Malley is irrelevant. Autumn Dec 2015 #76
Why do you care? frylock Dec 2015 #78
Sounds like a point that someone is trying to astroturf. Baitball Blogger Dec 2015 #11
+1. n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #12
It's a poorly run campaign. Amateurish and belligerent. sufrommich Dec 2015 #13
Really? Sen Sanders went from relitive unknown to millions of supporters in a relatively rhett o rick Dec 2015 #17
"So-called Democrats" run the Party. So-called socialists should be happy oasis Dec 2015 #32
You'll miss us next year. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #35
Honestly now, what percentage of (non DU) Bernie supporters oasis Dec 2015 #38
Won't be Trump Uponthegears Dec 2015 #59
Hillary will get her share of the dyed-in-the-wool ultra lefties. oasis Dec 2015 #80
Five words Uponthegears Dec 2015 #90
are they running again? reddread Dec 2015 #97
Cute Uponthegears Dec 2015 #102
four ugly words reddread Dec 2015 #103
What you mean is that Conservative Democrats run the leadership of the Party and rhett o rick Dec 2015 #36
Opinions vary on who or what is a "real Democrat". oasis Dec 2015 #37
She turned her back on the Democratic Party in 2002 and chose to side with the Republicons. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #84
Millions of Democrats believe she's Democrat enough for them. oasis Dec 2015 #87
Millions love Trump also and that's who we will get if she wins the nomination. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #91
Millions voted for her in 2008 with full knowledge of her oasis Dec 2015 #94
Hey you're welcome for the fucking votes. frylock Dec 2015 #79
Oh my, you mean that everyone in a campaign doesn't agree? Heaven forfend. libdem4life Dec 2015 #14
Sometimes the best defense really isn't an offense. ucrdem Dec 2015 #19
That is so cute. Bill was concern trolling. Luminous Animal Dec 2015 #49
My stars ... Bill is worried that Bernie is a typical politician Deny and Shred Dec 2015 #62
That's rich, isn't it? Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #72
Thanks for posting. There is no doubt in my mind who the NYTimes supports. But why rhett o rick Dec 2015 #20
The writer couldn't come up with enough examples Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #23
NY Times is a desperate newspaper Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #34
Propagandizing is hard work! n/t Oilwellian Dec 2015 #95
And the poster couldn't quote a single word from the article. arcane1 Dec 2015 #46
Tad Devine probably isn't helping. MBS Dec 2015 #24
or Dukakis rbrnmw Dec 2015 #29
OK, that is the ultimate example of incompetence. MBS Dec 2015 #89
Weaver enid602 Dec 2015 #25
What fucking infighting? hootinholler Dec 2015 #27
Everything is rosie and unicorns in other campaigns Omaha Steve Dec 2015 #42
Really interesting after the massive amount of hair pulling from sanders supporters FloridaBlues Dec 2015 #28
a bunch of unquoted nonsense stupidicus Dec 2015 #33
a former politco writer and rupert murdoch puppet: hopemountain Dec 2015 #41
Is this the reason Clinton is astro-turfing? Clearly a “tell of a losing campaign" dorkzilla Dec 2015 #43
If his campaign thinks "debates aren't his strength," then why the conspiracy theory here... Hekate Dec 2015 #53
The last paragraph in this article is telling of the effectiveness of Weaver combined with the facts Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #56
Sure sounds like Weaver is running the incompetent campaign here. Wait a second....! JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #83
The entire article is a crock. pangaia Dec 2015 #57
+Infinity! - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #68
k/r Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #65
"Bill Clinton has privately told friends he was astonished" ish of the hammer Dec 2015 #67
Wow. Just wow. concreteblue Dec 2015 #70
LOL, Hillary fans are classy. nt Logical Dec 2015 #71
Jim Weaver is a loose canon.. Cha Dec 2015 #74
more like a tight fugue reddread Dec 2015 #98
The feel of the article doesn't add up Jarqui Dec 2015 #77
Strange attribution in that article. Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #81
This post augered in... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #82
All you have to do is watch Weaver on TV to see R B Garr Dec 2015 #85
So you are gloating over this? Nedsdag Dec 2015 #92
Jeff Weaver, from Victory Comics... thesquanderer Dec 2015 #93
that is awesome reddread Dec 2015 #99
In case anyone missed the reference form the linked Times article... thesquanderer Dec 2015 #106
KICK! Cha Dec 2015 #104
This type of infighting is never a good sign Gothmog Dec 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times article on the i...»Reply #88