Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

highplainsdem

(48,902 posts)
Wed Oct 16, 2019, 09:47 PM Oct 2019

LOL! Warren campaign says she's looking for other revenue options for MFA, won't say what [View all]

I guess she FINALLY realized just how bad she was making herself look with all the evasiveness dodging the question of how she'd pay for Medicare for All. All it took was other candidates and the media pointing this out to her repeatedly.


https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/16/politics/elizabeth-warren-medicare-for-all/index.html


"She's reviewing the revenue options suggested by the 2016 Bernie campaign along with other revenue options. But she will only support pay-fors that meet the principles she has laid out in multiple debates," a Warren campaign aide said in a statement provided to CNN.

The campaign aide also said that the total cost of Medicare for All is unknown and that estimates vary by trillions of dollars. They did not provide details on what "other revenue options" the campaign is studying, and declined to comment on whether Warren may eventually put out her own details on paying for Medicare for All.

A new study by the Urban Institute, released Wednesday, said that federal spending on health care would increase by roughly $34 trillion under a single-payer plan similar to Medicare for All. That's in line with earlier studies that pegged the cost at around $32 trillion.

-snip-

Warren's repeated dodges on questions about whether Medicare for All would result in higher taxes are notably out of character for the senator, whose candidacy for the White House has gained steady political momentum in large part thanks to her abundance of policy plans and a knack for explaining and advocating for those ideas clearly out on the campaign trail.

-snip-

Tuesday's debate laid bare the political risks of Warren's backing of Sanders' Medicare for All, and foreshadowed that she is likely to continue confronting questions and criticism about tax hikes that could result from Sanders' proposal.

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg summed up Warren's predicament this way: "Your signature, senator, is to have a plan for everything. Except this." Former Vice President Joe Biden accused Warren of being "vague."

-snip-

"At least Bernie is being honest here, saying how he's going to pay for this -- taxes are going to go up," Klobuchar said. "Sorry Elizabeth, you haven't said that. We owe it to the American people to tell them where we will send the invoice."

-snip-




Btw, I'm glad she's finally realized she created a problem for herself here.

And I'll be interested in seeing what she finally comes up with as a source of revenue for MFA.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
However she decides to finance the plan, it will still be better than the current system. LonePirate Oct 2019 #1
A public option would be a strong, positive change. Also a feasible one. highplainsdem Oct 2019 #3
And still a "public option" from back in the day is just... JoeOtterbein Oct 2019 #21
No. That poll was useless because the question was so vague it was probably misread as highplainsdem Oct 2019 #24
So what's your number? 50% is enough for any issue to pass. JoeOtterbein Oct 2019 #28
I posted a poll here to ask liberal DUers this. Only a small fraction thought MFA could get highplainsdem Oct 2019 #32
As Amy said....her idea is not the only strong positive change Otto Lidenbrock Oct 2019 #4
That's right.. they all have Postive Changes. Cha Oct 2019 #5
Some of us prefer to cut out an incremental middleman that merely delays the implementation of MFA. LonePirate Oct 2019 #8
legislation. boomer_wv Oct 2019 #16
Once a DEm president starts pushing for MFA, the public and a Dem Congress will soon follow. LonePirate Oct 2019 #18
It's realism, not defeatism. highplainsdem Oct 2019 #27
Obama boomer_wv Oct 2019 #35
Thank you! A voice of sanity. We cannot afford another 2010. Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #46
And the only reason Obama had a supermajority is that Biden convinced Arlen Specter to switch highplainsdem Oct 2019 #53
Yes, we have to be realistic. Looking at the whole picture, winnowing out what won't work- mfa Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #48
Nailed it!! Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #49
Some of us want to win elections so we can make changes Midnightwalk Oct 2019 #20
I'm not sure she can pivot away from MFA at this point. But she might have to announce that wealth highplainsdem Oct 2019 #29
Exactly! peggysue2 Oct 2019 #55
It's distressing that so many Dems aren't realistic and don't seem to grasp just how difficult it UniteFightBack Oct 2019 #12
MFA requires a massive communication strategy from the WH. The ACA never had that. LonePirate Oct 2019 #14
That is not true. You can't sell something you can't prove. Congress will decide wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #34
It will be as bipartisan as the ACA. LonePirate Oct 2019 #64
Quite an expenditure of political capital. M4All will not be the only plan to fight for, to build emmaverybo Oct 2019 #59
This! Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #44
No matter if no one can afford it it will still be better! WTF? 34 trillion! wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #31
Who is going to support 32 trillion over 10 years? This out today by the CBO Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #51
Good.. that was Bewildering! Cha Oct 2019 #2
You're welcome, Cha! The article gave me a great laugh, especially after seeing so much highplainsdem Oct 2019 #6
I know.. the primaries actually suck.. Cha Oct 2019 #13
Seriously? JoeOtterbein Oct 2019 #22
Unicorns, magic beads and pixie dust time nt BlueMississippi Oct 2019 #7
LOL! highplainsdem Oct 2019 #11
I really like unicorns and magic beads..like ice cream too... can't live on it Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #42
How can you run on your plans ritapria Oct 2019 #9
It's been obvious for months that it was untenable. Amazing it took so long for her to realize that. highplainsdem Oct 2019 #10
Whatever tax source she finds will fall on us, although it might be worth it. Hoyt Oct 2019 #15
Whenever I mention an idea for a government program that will cost a fortune, Mr.Bill Oct 2019 #17
+1000! JoeOtterbein Oct 2019 #23
What a good campaign ad. We are going to take half of your wealth away! wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #38
But only from a very small amount of people. Mr.Bill Oct 2019 #40
I don't see this fact in the discussions on MFA. mjvpi Oct 2019 #19
Yep! JoeOtterbein Oct 2019 #26
No we are not! We are talking about raising $34 trillion dollars over 10 years. wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #41
2018 healthcare was 17.8% of US GDP mjvpi Oct 2019 #58
Math is hard. /nt tonedevil Oct 2019 #71
The problem with the Public Option ritapria Oct 2019 #25
You will always hear people calling SS a Ponzi scheme. Mr.Bill Oct 2019 #33
The public option will compete with private insurance. wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #43
Yes, it will compete "on a level playing field." subterranean Oct 2019 #57
So how many posts a day is it? Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #30
How is this an attack? Voters have a right to know where the money is going to come from Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #39
They don't mind "attacks" on Joe Biden but Cha Oct 2019 #50
Meh Bradshaw3 Oct 2019 #73
This is called Vetting with EW's own words Cha Oct 2019 #47
There are no other revenue options than a confiscatory tax on people PhoenixDem Oct 2019 #36
Please look up per capita spending for healthcare in the US vs other industrialized nations mjvpi Oct 2019 #45
To an average voter , the only thing that will matter is the 65% income tax. PhoenixDem Oct 2019 #54
Where did your number come from mjvpi Oct 2019 #60
Figure out the taxes collected this year PhoenixDem Oct 2019 #61
We are all ready spending $3.45 trillion a year mjvpi Oct 2019 #65
That will not fly with millions who have affordable and good quality plans through employers or emmaverybo Oct 2019 #69
CBO out with a a figure for mfa....32 Trillion over a decade. No wonder she doesn't want to own it!! Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #37
That's a lot of cash! Cha Oct 2019 #52
Biden said 30 trillion did he not? Just more optimistic than the reality. emmaverybo Oct 2019 #62
MFA or not in the End saljr1 Oct 2019 #56
Switch to a Medicare buy in for those that want it. Freethinker65 Oct 2019 #63
Bingo! peggysue2 Oct 2019 #67
Definitely a large part of the solution. OnDoutside Oct 2019 #70
Lol... sheshe2 Oct 2019 #66
Like you, sheshe, I'll vote for the Democratic nominee whoever it is. As for the LOL -- highplainsdem Oct 2019 #72
Looks as if she should have done her research from the start but neglected to do so. Not impressed! Skya Rhen Oct 2019 #68
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»LOL! Warren campaign say...»Reply #0