Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)LOL! Warren campaign says she's looking for other revenue options for MFA, won't say what [View all]
I guess she FINALLY realized just how bad she was making herself look with all the evasiveness dodging the question of how she'd pay for Medicare for All. All it took was other candidates and the media pointing this out to her repeatedly.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/16/politics/elizabeth-warren-medicare-for-all/index.html
"She's reviewing the revenue options suggested by the 2016 Bernie campaign along with other revenue options. But she will only support pay-fors that meet the principles she has laid out in multiple debates," a Warren campaign aide said in a statement provided to CNN.
The campaign aide also said that the total cost of Medicare for All is unknown and that estimates vary by trillions of dollars. They did not provide details on what "other revenue options" the campaign is studying, and declined to comment on whether Warren may eventually put out her own details on paying for Medicare for All.
A new study by the Urban Institute, released Wednesday, said that federal spending on health care would increase by roughly $34 trillion under a single-payer plan similar to Medicare for All. That's in line with earlier studies that pegged the cost at around $32 trillion.
-snip-
Warren's repeated dodges on questions about whether Medicare for All would result in higher taxes are notably out of character for the senator, whose candidacy for the White House has gained steady political momentum in large part thanks to her abundance of policy plans and a knack for explaining and advocating for those ideas clearly out on the campaign trail.
-snip-
Tuesday's debate laid bare the political risks of Warren's backing of Sanders' Medicare for All, and foreshadowed that she is likely to continue confronting questions and criticism about tax hikes that could result from Sanders' proposal.
South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg summed up Warren's predicament this way: "Your signature, senator, is to have a plan for everything. Except this." Former Vice President Joe Biden accused Warren of being "vague."
-snip-
"At least Bernie is being honest here, saying how he's going to pay for this -- taxes are going to go up," Klobuchar said. "Sorry Elizabeth, you haven't said that. We owe it to the American people to tell them where we will send the invoice."
-snip-
The campaign aide also said that the total cost of Medicare for All is unknown and that estimates vary by trillions of dollars. They did not provide details on what "other revenue options" the campaign is studying, and declined to comment on whether Warren may eventually put out her own details on paying for Medicare for All.
A new study by the Urban Institute, released Wednesday, said that federal spending on health care would increase by roughly $34 trillion under a single-payer plan similar to Medicare for All. That's in line with earlier studies that pegged the cost at around $32 trillion.
-snip-
Warren's repeated dodges on questions about whether Medicare for All would result in higher taxes are notably out of character for the senator, whose candidacy for the White House has gained steady political momentum in large part thanks to her abundance of policy plans and a knack for explaining and advocating for those ideas clearly out on the campaign trail.
-snip-
Tuesday's debate laid bare the political risks of Warren's backing of Sanders' Medicare for All, and foreshadowed that she is likely to continue confronting questions and criticism about tax hikes that could result from Sanders' proposal.
South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg summed up Warren's predicament this way: "Your signature, senator, is to have a plan for everything. Except this." Former Vice President Joe Biden accused Warren of being "vague."
-snip-
"At least Bernie is being honest here, saying how he's going to pay for this -- taxes are going to go up," Klobuchar said. "Sorry Elizabeth, you haven't said that. We owe it to the American people to tell them where we will send the invoice."
-snip-
Btw, I'm glad she's finally realized she created a problem for herself here.
And I'll be interested in seeing what she finally comes up with as a source of revenue for MFA.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
73 replies, 3132 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LOL! Warren campaign says she's looking for other revenue options for MFA, won't say what [View all]
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
OP
However she decides to finance the plan, it will still be better than the current system.
LonePirate
Oct 2019
#1
No. That poll was useless because the question was so vague it was probably misread as
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#24
I posted a poll here to ask liberal DUers this. Only a small fraction thought MFA could get
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#32
Some of us prefer to cut out an incremental middleman that merely delays the implementation of MFA.
LonePirate
Oct 2019
#8
Once a DEm president starts pushing for MFA, the public and a Dem Congress will soon follow.
LonePirate
Oct 2019
#18
And the only reason Obama had a supermajority is that Biden convinced Arlen Specter to switch
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#53
Yes, we have to be realistic. Looking at the whole picture, winnowing out what won't work- mfa
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#48
I'm not sure she can pivot away from MFA at this point. But she might have to announce that wealth
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#29
It's distressing that so many Dems aren't realistic and don't seem to grasp just how difficult it
UniteFightBack
Oct 2019
#12
MFA requires a massive communication strategy from the WH. The ACA never had that.
LonePirate
Oct 2019
#14
That is not true. You can't sell something you can't prove. Congress will decide
wasupaloopa
Oct 2019
#34
Quite an expenditure of political capital. M4All will not be the only plan to fight for, to build
emmaverybo
Oct 2019
#59
No matter if no one can afford it it will still be better! WTF? 34 trillion!
wasupaloopa
Oct 2019
#31
Who is going to support 32 trillion over 10 years? This out today by the CBO
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#51
You're welcome, Cha! The article gave me a great laugh, especially after seeing so much
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#6
I really like unicorns and magic beads..like ice cream too... can't live on it
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#42
It's been obvious for months that it was untenable. Amazing it took so long for her to realize that.
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#10
No we are not! We are talking about raising $34 trillion dollars over 10 years.
wasupaloopa
Oct 2019
#41
How is this an attack? Voters have a right to know where the money is going to come from
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#39
Please look up per capita spending for healthcare in the US vs other industrialized nations
mjvpi
Oct 2019
#45
To an average voter , the only thing that will matter is the 65% income tax.
PhoenixDem
Oct 2019
#54
That will not fly with millions who have affordable and good quality plans through employers or
emmaverybo
Oct 2019
#69
CBO out with a a figure for mfa....32 Trillion over a decade. No wonder she doesn't want to own it!!
Thekaspervote
Oct 2019
#37
Like you, sheshe, I'll vote for the Democratic nominee whoever it is. As for the LOL --
highplainsdem
Oct 2019
#72