Democratic Primaries

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)

43. You obviously aren't a lawyer.

Fri Dec 20, 2019, 10:05 AM

Dec 2019

Federal Rules of Evidence
Rule 6:
Evidence of a person's habit or an organization's routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice. The court may admit this evidence regardless of whether it is corroborated or whether there was an eyewitness.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In defense of Tulsi Gabbard, a little [View all] bluedye33139 Dec 2019 OP

IMHO, she is a Russian asset. n/t secondwind Dec 2019 #1

Is that your guess or you have some evidence at140 Dec 2019 #4

I guess it depends on what you think constitutes "substantial evidence" FrankBooth Dec 2019 #11

A Russian agent is one who is benefiting in some way at140 Dec 2019 #28

I disagree FrankBooth Dec 2019 #32

Since when behavior became evidence? at140 Dec 2019 #42

You obviously aren't a lawyer. MrsCoffee Dec 2019 #43

You are confusing criminal behavior with political behavior at140 Dec 2019 #44

Yeah, people choose to invoke that DU rule when it suits them. MrsCoffee Dec 2019 #45

I'm not advocating the argument either way, but an "asset" is not the same as an "agent" hlthe2b Dec 2019 #40

Nobody said she was a Russian agent. It's Russean "asset" and doesn't require her cooperation. nt LAS14 Dec 2019 #46

People are throwing that term around quite freely. It's absurd. nt UniteFightBack Dec 2019 #36

You are so correct ! nt at140 Dec 2019 #41

What do you mean by that? TheFarseer Dec 2019 #15

Probably just a "useful idiot" Jose Garcia Dec 2019 #20

also in the humble opinion of the former Secretary of State. nt BootinUp Dec 2019 #37

Thank you for this post. guillaumeb Dec 2019 #2

Trust lost is not (and should not) be so easily reclaimed in my opinion. hlthe2b Dec 2019 #3

One thing I've noticed about most fellow Dems happybird Dec 2019 #5

We need a positive campaign for 2020... VarryOn Dec 2019 #6

I can't resist... PatrickforO Dec 2019 #21

It took me a while to get of the Gabbard train. TidalWave46 Dec 2019 #7

I appreciate everything you're saying PatSeg Dec 2019 #8

I'd Try To See The Good In Her... smb Dec 2019 #9

There is NO defense of Gabbard.. she cooked her own goose. Cha Dec 2019 #10

Exactly, it's not partisan to side with rule of law and the U.S. Constitution /nt bucolic_frolic Dec 2019 #13

Precisely.. Gabbard is the "Extreme" one.. her "present" is Cha Dec 2019 #19

Not to mention she attacks the Democratic Party and fellow Democrats CONSTANTLY hlthe2b Dec 2019 #17

Yeah, I'm not buying anyone who wants to defend this.. even Cha Dec 2019 #23

Yes. It is the Republicans who made impeachment a partisan issue. PatrickforO Dec 2019 #22

You do you bucolic_frolic Dec 2019 #12

I'm not supporting her candidacy in this cycle, for sure bluedye33139 Dec 2019 #14

'By their fruit you shall recognize them.' LanternWaste Dec 2019 #16

Well, Anakin Skywalker was supposed to bring balance to the Force. PatrickforO Dec 2019 #18

F - for trying to turn the Star Wars prequel trilogy into an analogy for something important. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2019 #27

She poisoned, absolutely poisoned HRC's campaign. LisaM Dec 2019 #24

A representative's job is to represent their constituents IronLionZion Dec 2019 #25

Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice shame on me njhoneybadger Dec 2019 #26

She voted "present" on the impeachment vote last night... need anyone say anymore??!! Thekaspervote Dec 2019 #29

she didn;t want to piss off Puti, trumpo/gop who will fund her 3rd party run beachbumbob Dec 2019 #30

If you don't vote to impeach the criminal, you enable the criminal. Sloumeau Dec 2019 #31

I don't understand how anyone can still support or defend her Hav Dec 2019 #33

I think people make a lot out of her anti-war statements bluedye33139 Dec 2019 #34

Very compassionate and empathetic, but she is not a liberal, and her agenda is detrimental Nitram Dec 2019 #35

I have zero use for her RhodeIslandOne Dec 2019 #38

I was a strong defender but not on this JonLP24 Dec 2019 #39