Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Suddenly, Biden leads in Iowa! [View all]LongtimeAZDem
(4,516 posts)18. They do explain their methodology:
Differentiator 1: We adjust state polls based on trends in national polls
A hallmark of our general election forecasts, dating all the way back to our first versions in 2008, is what we call a trend line adjustment. Basically, in states that havent been polled recently, we make inferences about whats going on there using national polls or polls from other states that have been surveyed recently. If President Trump gained 3 percentage points in national polls, for instance, but North Carolina hadnt been polled recently, you could probably infer that hed also gained 3 points, or thereabouts, in North Carolina.
We apply this adjustment for a good reason: Trend-line-adjusted averages have been quite a bit more accurate, historically. That is, once someone does get around to polling North Carolina, it usually turns out that Trump did gain about 3 points. Trend-line-adjusted averages have also been insightful so far this cycle they anticipated, for instance, that Sen. Elizabeth Warrens numbers would decline in state polls in November and early December once she began to slump in national polls.
So were now applying a slightly simplified version1 of the trend line adjustment to the primaries. (Note that all polling averages you see on our state polling pages reflect this trend line adjustment.) Say that Sen. Cory Booker has surged by 5 points in national polls, for instance, but we havent seen a recent poll in Nevada. Our average would assume that hed also improved his standing by 5 points in Nevada, other things held equal.
There are a few complications: For instance, the adjustment is nonlinear, which can have meaningful effects if a candidate is polling in the low single digits. But in short, the trend line adjustment can have fairly large effects if a state hasnt been polled much recently. It doesnt affect our numbers much, conversely, if there are a lot of recent, high-quality polls from that state.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-makes-our-new-2020-democratic-primary-polling-averages-different/
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There will likely be an even division of delegates coming out of Iowa, and the current positions
LongtimeAZDem
Jan 2020
#2
It's explained at the top; it's a moving average, less recent numbers have less weight
LongtimeAZDem
Jan 2020
#15
You beat me to it...I was going to say that too...the same is true in New Hampshire by the way
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#16
Very interesting...we should see some polls in Iowa soon too. But I think 538 is brilliant and trust
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#20
As more candidates drop out and as things become more frightening around the world
redstatebluegirl
Jan 2020
#4
I think redqueen is correct. I believe that this is how I saw things on 538...
Sloumeau
Jan 2020
#11
It has moved...My guess is national polls are also figured in...biden is ahead 10 points or more in
Demsrule86
Jan 2020
#13