|
Ask
Auntie Pinko
August
14, 2003
Dear
Readers,
Auntie Pinko was simply amazed at the response to my request
for "economic fix" ideas. Not only were there so many of them,
but they showed a creativity, insight, imagination, and expertise
that makes me so proud of you all. I certainly hope you're
taking these wonderful ideas to your candidates and elected
leaders. I certainly hope you're using them as you participate
in your local, regional, or State Democratic Party, building
up platforms and policies. I certainly hope you're sending
them to your local newspapers, blogging them, posting them
on websites, and sharing them as many ways as possible.
It was a challenge to pick a few to share with you - I'd
love to share them all, but we must be considerate in our
use of bandwidth, after all. I did notice some major themes
that many readers addressed in a similar fashion:
Public
Works and Infrastructure Investment
Alan, who tells me he is an engineer, suggests:
Repeal
at least part of the last two rounds of tax cuts (on as
fair a basis as politically possible) and hand ALL the money
back to the States to invest in public infrastructure. There
is a huge backlog of projects waiting in transportation,
water supply, wastewater treatment, environmental cleanup
etc. that need to be done. Many of them are already planned
and designed and sitting "on the shelf" waiting for funding.
This will lead to significant immediate increases in employment
in engineering and construction, and the benefits will "trickle
out" to everybody much quicker than the "trickle down" we
keep waiting for.
Bruce is even more specific:
Repeal
the recent $550 billion tax cut and create a major government
public works plan, where 9 million people could get jobs
averaging $50,000 (with $100 billion going to administration,
purchase of materials, etc.) That would: 1) Cut the unemployment
rate almost in half; 2) Get a whole lot of work done on
our infrastructure; 3) Require a whole lot of materials,
spurring on manufacturing; 4) Increase the tax revenue base
due to the extra $450 billion in wages, and 5) Help reenergize
the economy by putting spending money in the pockets of
those 9 million people.
Ben is a little more focused, but on the same general
lines:
How
about employing the out-of-work with a government works
program? This would help parks, roads, school maintenance,
etc. while providing income directly to people who most
desperately need it and of course are most likely to spend
that income to stimulate consumer demand. Run properly,
it could also teach job skills in areas that are immediately
needed.
Ending
"Job Flight" Overseas and Creating Jobs in the U.S.
Lots of readers said it, but Bob from Buffalo was
perhaps the most succinct and straightforward about it:
The
US should either heavily penalize US companies or tariff
their products if they close business here and hire overseas.
We'll get a short-term influx of cash and companies will
stop (or never start) moving jobs to India. Employment will
go up and so will spending.
Dave was a bit more creative about a similar goal:
My
proposal - jack up the overall tax rate again, but give
a break for investing in truly American companies - those
who hire Americans and buy American products and raw materials.
For a company like Wal-Mart for example, determine the percentage
of sales from foreign-made products vs. American made products,
and have Wal-Mart report their own effective capital tax
rate to the IRS. It'll make you think twice about investing
in a company which imports so much finished product.
Teresa likes the carrot approach, rather than the
stick:
The
one thing we should do to fix the economy is bring good
jobs back to the US. We could do that by giving tax breaks
to businesses that create American jobs which pay over a
certain dollar figure (perhaps 18 bucks an hour and up).
In addition they would have to prove that more than half
their labor cost below the executive level was directed
to the US citizenship.
Payroll
Tax Holiday
A number of readers would implement another tax cut, but
this time focused where it might have a big short-term impact.
Megan simply suggests:
One
measure would be a temporary payroll tax decrease or payroll
tax holiday.
And a reader who forgot to sign their e-mail offered a suggestion
on how to pay for it:
My
immediate economic fix would be to simultaneously cut the
$55 billion (out of $97 billion) in corporate welfare that
is currently being doled out to Fortune 500 companies, then
use that money to cut payroll taxes by the same amount -
across the board. That evenly spreads the aid among employers
and earmarks the savings for job creation and higher take-home
pay for workers - especially among the working poor.
Tax
Policy Reform
Auntie was really quite intimidated by how many of my readers
are savvy about the complexities of tax policy and how it
can be used to stimulate the economy (I'll have to be very
careful about any casual suggestions in this area, I can tell.)
Some were quite straightforward, like Thomas:
All
you have to do is undo that worthless tax cut enacted in
April (except for the checks which have already gone out)
and send that $100 million to the states where is can help
the economy and save thousands of jobs. It is simple Keynesianism.
It works much better than reverse Keynesianism.
And Casey:
I
would repeal the ridiculous exemption of certain dividends
from taxation. This measure has no benefit to the economy.
A much more effective way to eliminate the so-called "double
taxation" of corporate profits/dividends is to allow corporations
to deduct dividend payments from before-tax profits. Thus
encouraging a company to either share more profit with shareholders
or reinvest its profits into itself, rather than provide
a tiny tax benefit for most Americans and a large benefit
for the relative few who have large dividend incomes.
Ben R. remembers his history, and suggests reviving
an old policy:
The
outrageous tax cuts MUST be repealed, followed by excess
profits tax on war related business. During World War II,
the excess profits tax was as high as 90%. That made sense
then and it does now. Patriotism should be its own reward;
it should not be made profitable for a few at the expense
of all the rest.
Business
Sector Reform
Plenty of readers looked at the powerful impact of the business
sector, and suggested ways to help them be more effective
in reviving the economy. Matt says:
Wall
Street companies should be charged with actively voting
on every slate of boards of directors of every company they
own in every portfolio both debt and equity, and that vote
must be in the interest of their shareholders, not their
own interests. Investment banks who handle personal and
pension investment accounts should not be allowed to consult,
provide tax services or any other financial service beyond
auditing to companies they invest in. The auditing they
would provide would then have to be top rate. And we should
require auditors to report malicious, fraudulent or deceptive
practices in the same way those who care for children must
report any evidence of child abuse.
And Bill suggests:
Require
all corporations with 100 or more employees include on their
Board of Directors a representative of the employees chosen
by the union, or if no union, by a vote of the employees.
Spending
Cuts
Never let it be said that liberals don't understand the
value of the spending cut when it comes to addressing economic
problems. Here are just a couple of the suggestions from Auntie
Pinko's readers like Larry:
I
propose we cut the military budget by 50%, refrain from
taxing Americans for 1/3 of this cut (so each individual
gets a modest benefit), and then spend the other 2/3 of
this reduction of the very infrastructure projects your
article mentions. We can focus said defense cuts on non-personnel
cutbacks. We might consider beginning by eliminating the
Black Budget altogether, scrapping major tactical nuclear
weapons R&D and production (hey, we can already destroy
the planet 10 times over, how much more do we need?)
And a slightly different focus from Teena:
Sign
an Executive Order suspending all private contracts for
Iraq reconstruction until an investigation into the vetting
of contracts by board members of those companies serving
on the Defense Policy Board (which marketed the war) was
complete. In the meantime reconstruct Iraq with the Army
Corp of Engineers, the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps and allow
laid off Americans in the tech sector to apply for jobs
with these organizations to rebuild and update infrastructure.
Finally, suspend all missile defense programs until they
are scientifically proven more likely than not to succeed.
Other
Neat Ideas
Lots of people pointed out the value of implementing a single-payer
health plan, and several also mentioned investing in the development
of power sources to make us independent of fossil fuels. Others
ranged even wider for their creative suggestions:
According to Roxanne, we should:
Set
up a resource of "Inventions Connections." A place for all
these laid off geniuses who have come up with the next,
great wave of things we didn't realize we can't live without.
A place where sponsors agree the inventor gets to retain
control of their invention to take it to market. A place
where funding meets the invention, without stealing it out
of the hands of the inventor. The US economy will never
recover without something new and exciting to start a wave
of investing, spending and consuming. Make that easy.
Kathleen looks at an intriguing systemic approach:
The
first thing I would do is implement "systems thinking" in
every department of government, state and local. Systems
thinking involves building a mathematically based computer
model with all variables (well, all those that can reasonably
be predicted). Then you run the model and see if outcomes
meet predictions or (as often happens) if there will be
unexpected outcomes. Variables can be adjusted to affect
outcomes, more variables can be added, and of course, no
computer model can be completely accurate in the real world.
However, it can reveal possible negative outcomes to any
new policy or change to current policy more accurately than
the standard linear thinking with two opposing opinions
currently in use. Also, systems is versatile; the process
has been used for everything from predicting population
and housing changes, to the physics of a cooling cup of
coffee, to determining how chivalrous Sir Gawain is in mediaeval
poetry.
And finally, an idea I really liked from a reader using
their DU handle of radfringe:
Create
a national goal. This is good on two fronts - it gives America
something to be proud of and it will also create JOBS and
technologies that will branch out and benefit all of us.
Just look at all the technologies and jobs that grew out
of and were benefited by Kennedy's challenge to land a man
on the moon by the end of a decade. It will mean the government
will have to provide some seed money, grants, loans or other
sorts of monetary support/incentives. So what kind of national
goal? How about kicking the oil habit? Alternative energy
sources nationwide in 10-20 years?
Goodness! This has been a long column. But believe
me, dear Readers, it could easily have been five times as
long with all the wonderful ideas from you. Now that you've
had these wonderful ideas, don't just share them with Auntie
- share them everywhere there's an opportunity.
It's pretty clear that we can't rely on Mr. Bush and his
Administration to rescue our economy. But Americans have always
been do-it-yourselfers. Let's concentrate on getting these
ideas circulated, and on electing some Democrats who will
help us implement them. Thanks again, this time for telling
Auntie Pinko!
View
Auntie's Archive
Do you have a question for Auntie Pinko?
Do political discusions discombobulate you? Are you a liberal
at a loss for words when those darned dittoheads babble their
talking points at you? Or a conservative, who just can't understand
those pesky liberals and their silliness? Auntie Pinko has
an answer for everything.
Just send e-mail to: mail@democraticunderground.com,
and make sure it says "A question for Auntie Pinko"
in the subject line. Please include your name and hometown.
|