|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 05:44 PM Original message |
Army Officer Explains How Armor Adds Costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, the suspension system wears out 3-4 times faster ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. gosh, does that mean that a humvee that has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdj
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 01:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
43. it's even worse isn't it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. "the Army had never seen an IED threat like it faces in Iraq" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. well, they didn't have ied's in vietnam... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 12:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. and they used our own unexploded ordnance, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 12:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. Still they should have been protecting our soldiers against that type |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashmanonar
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. No problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. Are they from the Vietnam era or more recent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 10:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. who could have predicted the Iraqis were smart enough??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jukes
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. doesn't getting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chieftain
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Excellent question . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. No, that comes from a different account, apparently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 03:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
36. Not in the units budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teach1st
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Which would mean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. So the problems with the wear and tear on the suspension system and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. according to Rumsfailed - our troops are replaceable - "fungible" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. While many of them are busy completely f***ing up shrub's war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wait a sec... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. No, we have to SELL the oil there to make more money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. $87 billion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Haliburton...where else? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Acryliccalico
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I guess some pockets are real deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiosyncratic
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. Uh, if they had secured the explosives, there wouldn't be IEDs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Tell me why Tommy Franks got a Freedom Medal too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiosyncratic
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I was looking for a different cartoon about those medals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msgadget
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 01:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Read Doonesbury's 12/30/04 strip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Say effing what??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. a war of containment needs a steady supply of warm bodies not armor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boosterman
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is what ticks me off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasChick
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. Well, duh, Mr. Sorenson. Just maybe the Chimp should have never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
27. Well, then replace the gas-guzzling Hummers with something better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vs the introvore
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 01:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
44. please. you ninny, no offence intended, the HMMWV is not a Hummer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Thu Dec-30-04 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
28. It adds to the cost and...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
30. So the armor kits should include beefed up springs, shocks, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 11:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. light weight ceramic armor programs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 08:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
48. My thoughts exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
31. People are cannon fodder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
32. actually, operating costs decrease with decreasing casualties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
33. What does it cost to treat a wounded person for life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
driver8
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 03:14 AM Response to Original message |
35. "The Army regrets to inform you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Fri Dec-31-04 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
38. Had no idea it would face an extensive IED threat: no shit! Seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
41. un-fucking-real (sorry mods, delete if words too harsh) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. That's right . We telegraphed the invasion for months, just in case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frangible
![]() |
Sat Jan-01-05 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
42. yeah, ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC