|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| tuvor
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:20 AM Original message |
| GOP Wants to Create Secretive Gov't Agency |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ixion
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. somone tell me again why rethugs get to hold on to the 'small government' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tace
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Every Day Another Step Deeper Into American Fascism |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DBoon
|
Fri Dec-02-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 12. "paging Doctor Mengele" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Javaman
|
Fri Dec-02-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 18. I was thinking the same exact thing, there own little trial and error farm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| classysassy
|
Fri Dec-02-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. Pigs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Javaman
|
Fri Dec-02-05 03:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. I don't know, I think Devil Dogs are quite tasty, cream filling and all... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cantstandbush
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 69. So if they secretly test humans, we will never know about it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| katty
|
Mon Dec-05-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 97. they want MORE Secrecy?! look at trackrecord of lies so far! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zbdent
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Okay, so let's allow them to test the drugs on humans |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| leveymg
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. And, release new drugs without testing them > |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zbdent
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Only to the righties |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yavin4
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 10. They Have Plenty of Human Test Subjects |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nomen Tuum
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 11. Can you say "TUSKEEGEE EXPERIMENT" boys and girls?????????? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| justabob
|
Fri Dec-02-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 21. Apparently its ok to test pesticides on small children, why not drugs? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rodeodance
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. its a bad sign --from all angles. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tippy
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. The first question that should be asked is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bridget Burke
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Science runs on "information" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 0007
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Worked with Dick Cheney. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BanzaiBonnie
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. This is what gets me --- and we should start using it against corporations |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| thecrow
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Don't they already HAVE enough "secret agencies"???? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Brooklyn Michael
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. "We must ensure the federal government.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| raysr
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 16. Yeah, I'll bet they |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Fri Dec-02-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. Welp, Dems have the power to filibuster this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NVMojo
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. GOP Wants to Create Secretive Gov't Agency |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| savemefromdumbya
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 23. OMG |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NVMojo
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 28. ...and don't forget, isn't it Rumsfeld who has stock in Tamiflu??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| savemefromdumbya
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 32. our congressmen should be making a song and dance about this one! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stickdog
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 67. How was the GOD DAMN Chairman of the Board of the company |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JerseygirlCT
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 45. Took the words out of my mouth. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KittyWampus
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. How many microbiologists were found dead? They already have this Dept |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lovuian
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 70. I agree the testing is going on even now!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IA_Seth
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 25. Not usually a conspiracy advocate.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Megahurtz
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 26. So THIS is why they started the Bird Flu scare! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KittyWampus
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 27. Did the US Govt ever find out who sent that Govt. Grade Anthrax to Dems? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| savemefromdumbya
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 30. the gov knew that the gov sent out the anthrax |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Solon
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 46. It was both a dry run on the lethality of Anthrax... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LeftHander
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 29. Another ONE!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sui generis
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 31. Here's a short answer: NO. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Neocondriac
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 33. Just another step along the way to ..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Megahurtz
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 36. This is Truely Frightening. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| savemefromdumbya
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 34. Nominate this for the DU main page |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| triguy46
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 35. Everything they want to do requires secrecy, and for good reason... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| savemefromdumbya
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 38. the lengths they go to, to cover up take 9/11 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Triana
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 37. This has corporatocracy/plutocracy written all over it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ilsa
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 39. Have the Rethugs all line up for their experimental vaxes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nashville_brook
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 40. CODE NAME: Capt. TRIPS |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pastiche423
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 57. I just re-read |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| W stands for Wacko
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 41. This time they are trying to appear as if they asking for permission? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Backlash Cometh
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 42. Oh, fuck you. FUCK YOU ALREADY! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| adarling
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 43. I thought the super secret agency was the CIA or NSA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clara T
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 44. Bio-weaponry |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| K-W
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 47. Wow, was just reading about Imperial Japan's "Epidemic Prevention" program |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NVMojo
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 48. holy smoke! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NVMojo
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 49. I apologize to the original poster, this is a dupe, can we combine? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 50. mandatory bird flu vaccine? That'll be ready as soon as we strain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shadoobie
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. Does DARPA even run this way? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmark
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. Worst ffing idea I have ever heard, and would be the case if dems |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ContraBass Black
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Whoa. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ailsagirl
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. self-delete |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Skidmore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. They don't have enough of them? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Us vs Them
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 56. Shielded from public scrutiny? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HuffleClaw
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 58. "protect the proprietary interests of drug companies" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wordie
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. The drug industry wishes to avoid publication of its research. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| xchrom
|
Fri Dec-02-05 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. facists love this secret agencies and drugs crap, don't they? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| firefox
|
Fri Dec-02-05 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. Can you say "medical facsism"? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Straight Shooter
|
Fri Dec-02-05 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 62. History of Secret Experimentation on U.S. Citizens, 1931 - 1997 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zann725
|
Fri Dec-02-05 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. So they'll "test" these drugs on the poor, and Medicare patients? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tabasco
|
Fri Dec-02-05 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. Yes, maybe put drugs in the drinking water without our knowledge. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MountainLaurel
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 65. Don't they have enough already?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stickdog
|
Fri Dec-02-05 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. Do you get it now, SUCKERS??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Generator
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:24 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 72. I try to not be paranoid nutter with tinfoil |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NuttyFluffers
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 68. why does my deeply cynical mind first think, "Mengele"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Generator
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. This is Scooter Libby's wet dream come true |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lovuian
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. I swear we are in the XFiles looking at the Smokin Man's |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anotherdrew
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. so why haven't the democrats pronounced this "dead on arrival" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NVMojo
|
Sat Dec-03-05 12:41 AM Response to Reply #74 |
| 76. send it to Reid with a letter asking him to stop it now!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BjohnsonMN
|
Fri Dec-02-05 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 75. This is sickening...spread it widely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BenDavid
|
Sat Dec-03-05 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 77. bush knew |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CoffeeCat
|
Sat Dec-03-05 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 78. I really don't get this at all...DARPA all ready performs these functions. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PinkyisBlue
|
Sat Dec-03-05 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 79. Twins |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| paineinthearse
|
Sat Dec-03-05 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 80. Is anyone monitoring BARDA? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DallasNE
|
Sat Dec-03-05 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 81. Somebody Please Explain To Me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| area51
|
Sat Dec-03-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #81 |
| 86. Welcome. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nightwing
|
Sat Dec-03-05 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
| 82. Puts the exclamation point on let's get rid of these pricks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Exit
|
Sat Dec-03-05 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 83. Gad, they never give up, do they? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lost4words
|
Sat Dec-03-05 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 84. Super Secret Intel Agency or SS for short, no doubt. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IowaGuy
|
Sat Dec-03-05 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 85. Yeah, right...... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| enough
|
Sat Dec-03-05 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. kick |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TankLV
|
Sat Dec-03-05 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 88. First - I don't trust ANYTHING these repukes create in the first place! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mojambo
|
Sat Dec-03-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 89. There are totally going to be Resident Evil Zombies if they do this. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anotherdrew
|
Sat Dec-03-05 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 90. they should make it an Organization insead of an Agency |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Selteri
|
Sat Dec-03-05 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 91. Yes, the secrecy we already have is so good at serving people. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| obreaslan
|
Mon Dec-05-05 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 92. Can't have nasty oversights, while we try to work out the Final Solution.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 0007
|
Mon Dec-05-05 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 93. bttft |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| myrna minx
|
Mon Dec-05-05 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 94. Kick for this sick story. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DSperoRN
|
Mon Dec-05-05 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 95. Scariest thing yet? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| superconnected
|
Mon Dec-05-05 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 96. I thought we already had a secret gov agency in the white house. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stickdog
|
Mon Dec-05-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 98. When Pusher comes to shove. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zorra
|
Mon Dec-05-05 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 99. When homeless folks start disappearing en masse |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC