|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 08:59 PM Original message |
Bush cited as breaking ‘no comment’ policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. presidential slip-up, actually. prerogative my ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. He knows DeLay owns him........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. And Jack Abramoff owns Tom DeLay lock, stock & barrel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Riiight! And it is also his prerogative to flip-flop on commenting about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. This will open up the WH press conferences if the reporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. i'd call this a big 'OOPS' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. You can bet Rove chewed shrub's ass for that one. eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good to see someone else noticed that too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. he fucked up and blew their cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. Of course DeLay is innocent. The 12 jury members haven't said guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess
![]() |
Thu Dec-15-05 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. he is such a douchebag but its his prerogative n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginian
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
13. He isn't involved in the DeLay case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdadd
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
14. It's common knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirtyDawg
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. Please, please, Patrick Fitzgerald... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 06:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I believe Fitzgerald already interviewed Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:03 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Interview does not equal testify, unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It doesn't matter when you are being interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Martha Stewart didn't appoint the head of the FBI either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. When it is for a Grand Jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dusty64
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinzonner
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
16. presidential prerogative = hypocrisy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
18. Y'all are forgetting a key point: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
19. Nixon intervened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
23. So Tom is going to get a pardon, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:02 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. The President can pardon someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Great. Thanks for making my day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sdfernando
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Yeah, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VaYallaDawg
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
24. That whole crowd just cannot resist the temptation to be crooks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
25. Perhaps DA Earle should subpoena Stupidhead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emald
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
28. sounds to me like our douchebag Resident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
30. but but but he's a good FRIEND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat Dec-17-05 04:46 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. And he's doing a heck of a job ............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BReisen
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
33. Presidential Prerogative" my arse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zara
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. People are so Nitpicky! His policy has always been... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
35. not to split the hair too finely but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
36. At least he is consistent..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
37. Delay innocent? I beg your pardon! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
38. maybe someone needs to define indictment for Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kanrok
![]() |
Fri Dec-16-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. Well, techincally speaking, DeLay is currently innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC