|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 07:47 PM Original message |
BREAKING: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS LAUNCHED AGAINST DIEBOLD IN FLORIDA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Just wait... They'll find a way to "Shelley" Sancho... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's what it looks like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
memory
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
36. NO!! NO!! NO!!! Is there any way that we can help him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:54 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. The discussion needs to be framed differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:24 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Maybe we should tell them..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredStembottom
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #42 |
56. You are not so far off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wordie
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 11:51 AM Response to Reply #38 |
58. Just tell RWers that the Moscow Times has picked up the story! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sojourner
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 12:35 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. nah. anything that comes from outside the US is suspect in their eyes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Tell them that's a rather "Pravdaish" attitude for them to have! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sojourner
![]() |
Fri Mar-10-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #62 |
75. they wouldn't get it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. On what grounds is Jeb trying to remove Sancho? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. For not complying with HAVA requirements. Same reason NY is being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. so , what is your take on why the e-voting companies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. This in Brad's article pretty well says it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wordie
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
60. Could Sancho countersue??? In that he is being forced to commit an illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
41. Optical scan machines with paper ballots can be used in Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. K & R! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. kick! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sancho can use paper ballots! They are still legal, cheap, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Can't use paper ballots in FL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. We use them in Alachua County |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Well, then I was wrong. I thought I read that they couldn't be used in FL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Paper Ballots in Florida... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Thanks, Brad. That is what I was thinking of regarding paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Thanks for the info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbyR
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:48 AM Response to Reply #20 |
50. Do WHAT??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
64. they won't allow hand counts in FL ever since GORE WON there, am I right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:56 AM Response to Reply #20 |
53. You are f****ing kidding me. How did I miss that one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wordie
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
59. What were they thinking??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. I agree an additional lawsuit towards that original law is also in order.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Turn it around, that a HAND COUNT is MANDATED until and unless a machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 06:59 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Yeah, Chuck Hagel should have taken a hike years ago for that reason! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Yes, paper ballots are still legal in Florida, but hand counting them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Thanks, that's what I was thinking of. Knew they'd found some way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Even Orwell could have not imagined this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue4barb
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
17. I am so proud of my hometown....give 'em hell Ion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oscarguy
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. Electronic voting is recipe for election fraud. We need a paper trail... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. See my previous reply, oscarguy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. The solution=Never use a machine to count paper ballots in the 1st place! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Solution Not That Simple... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. For the visually impaired, why not use paper ballots written in braille? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oscarguy
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Well that really is a BUMMER. Are you saying it is illegal to have a ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Not illegal to have a "recount", but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liquiduniverse
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Wouldn't it be possible to bring in a different machine counter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BradBlog
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 04:45 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Nope...not if they won't do business with Sancho. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 06:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Nominated here also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
32. Sancho = TRUE HERO of Democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedOnce
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
34. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian
![]() |
Wed Mar-08-06 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
35. Whoo HOO Sancho!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JudyM
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
37. Fascinating. Think of all the information that will come out in discovery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
39. Just a kick for all them people so interested in personalities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:27 AM Response to Original message |
43. Thanks Brad for this good news. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
44. Take a sec to Thank the Media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
66. I wrote to thank Grimm, Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
45. We have to get legislation that would make the companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
46. Will election officials put "bidness" ahead of integrity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
48. I can't figure our why the Repukes don't want the machines unhackable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:50 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. More like, do Rethugs REALLY think there's a "non-cheating" reason for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbyR
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:54 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. OK, now that we know what they're doing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
49. How is this playing in Florida? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
54. This unfortunate mess we've found ourselves in for the past 5 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
55. Oh hell yeah oh hell yeah oh hell yeah! Woooooodamnwhoooo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
57. I just sent this to Senator Nelson and my Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. just sent it to Hardball and Keith O |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
63. OMG! Sancho, watch your back b/c BFEE is after you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmyStrange
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
68. MORE Info: DePuy: Sancho should face jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Gee, all this trouble to get sancho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
69. Ion Sancho, you are a patriot and I salute you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected
![]() |
Thu Mar-09-06 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
73. gotta love his name - Ion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC