|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 02:13 AM Original message |
CA Bill to Bolster Election Clout Gains: national popular vote winner... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. "Here, we don't want these 55 electoral votes. Someone else take them." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 02:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 04:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Is our future at steak in 08? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. Stupid.....stooooppidddd.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. I see it having the opposite effect in some areas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnaveRupe
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Because their electoral votes would go to the popular winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. Right and thus Gore would have won over Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
38. "I voted. For who, I doesn't know. But I voted." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. What nonsense is this? Politicians can now IGNORE CA entirely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 04:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
45. I don't understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 12:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. That's the first thing I said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Well, maybe I don't understand either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
5. This is the first I've heard of this bill; some serious thought is require |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnaveRupe
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 04:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. What the heck are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 05:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. What you say is true, if 04 had been subject to this bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnaveRupe
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 07:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 08:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Changing the primaries is one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 12:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. This is *very* dangerous. And here is why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. I don't think your scenario is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 10:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Electoral college is only partially based on population. That is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 01:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. It's an arguable point, but the bill only goes into effect if they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. I agree, this deserves serious thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. But, I don't think it's about primaries - it's the tone of the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 12:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. See post #22 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 02:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
51. But Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 - and he stole the vote in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. Should just eliminate the electoral college then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. Exactly...get rid the electoral college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
President Kerry
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. This measure might only merit serious consideration if ALL states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. It would not take effect unless enough states signed on to equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
13. Bill to BolsterElectionClout Gains (nat'l popular vote winner gets CA) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. just dump the electoral college in the first place... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
52. This is easier than dumping the electoral college .nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Personally, I think a better option would be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnaveRupe
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Two words: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keopeli
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 09:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. I understand your suggestions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 11:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
39. Ensures that Congress will NEVER oppose the White House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
47. I agree with you and disagree with you at the same time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
16. How about we get rid of the electoral college instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. This is a bill to do exactly that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 12:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. This bill won't do that unless all 50 states sign on (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 03:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. This bill makes electorate college redundant. which is the same thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 04:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Doesn't that mean it's unconstitutional? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 11:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Constitution Article II, section 1: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 11:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Yep, that was the ace in the hole in FL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 05:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Not unless they get enough signed up to guarantee victory for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sgent
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 05:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
46. This bill only requries 50% of electoral college votes +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. Here is the *next* brilliant idea!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 12:12 AM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Eleven states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CPMaz
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. This is incredibly stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon
![]() |
Wed May-31-06 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
30. This makes NO sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
44. Too many posters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu Jun-01-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
48. Ideally we should abolish the Electoral College outright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC