|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
robcon
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:37 AM Original message |
Lieberman Opens 17-Point Lead In Connecticut, Poll Finds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monarch
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. No way that poll is accurate!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigscott
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. i agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Yes it Is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
against all enemies
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
70. You seem happy about that. Lieberman is a neocon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #70 |
84. Actually I just think she was telling the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:21 AM Response to Reply #84 |
108. Yes. I don't think Lamont has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:19 AM Response to Reply #70 |
107. I didn't say I was happy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
143. LIMPMANN IS BUSH " LITE" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 10:30 PM Response to Reply #143 |
174. Yes, but he still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #70 |
151. I didn't read it that way; the poster is just pointing out a fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
106. Deleted message |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:22 AM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Well since I don't live in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
163. sorry, but the Q-poll is flawed and does not include 2nd debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. It probably is, that's what happens when grassroots insist on pushing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
72. It's what happens when RIGHT WING DEMOCRATS don't vote for the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 07:51 PM Response to Reply #72 |
91. centrists get a special pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jax
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #72 |
121. Wish I could nominate this reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 05:49 PM Response to Reply #121 |
136. Thank you. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 07:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
90. What are you saying, we should've NOT talked about the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. However, there are LIeberman supporters for whom the war is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #90 |
144. The salient point- Lamont has successfully been tarred as ONE ISSUE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:35 AM Response to Reply #144 |
154. The way you say that, it sounds like you think it serves Lamont right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Quinnipiac - Oct 2000: Hillary slipping, neck in neck with Lazio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. They still had her up 3pts, which is the same that Zogby had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
79. You feel the poll is inaccurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
97. Interesting that you show up to support a pro Lieberman poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. Je ne comprends pas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. Republicans were voting for Lamont?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
48. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. On average? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. Every poll ever conducted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 06:37 PM Response to Reply #73 |
86. You can't have an "up to" figure that is "on average" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 10:43 PM Response to Reply #86 |
147. I meant, in an average race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
5. I don't want to sound pessimistic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
111. Very good analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
167. what you are saying, essentially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
6. Goddamn it, why didn't Harry Reid make it clear the day after the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. One has to wonder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. What choice did he have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Because Reid will need Joe . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Good luck with that. better chances with Bush than Joe I'm afraid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
129. Lordy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:37 AM Response to Reply #129 |
156. What "reality" are you saying we should accept? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:42 AM Response to Reply #156 |
160. "The leadership" is not responsible for Ned going down to defeat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 08:12 AM Response to Reply #160 |
161. That makes it impossible for the "netroots" to decide where to work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 09:39 AM Response to Reply #161 |
164. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. Joe wouldn't be winning if Reid had made it clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. That's untrue . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. Because he is a frightened, hand-wringing little girl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:37 AM Response to Reply #29 |
115. Deleted message |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #115 |
132. Could've done without the "obeys his Israeli masters" line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. Because they can't make changes midterm with a full vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
46. It certaintly didn't help that a few Democrats went against Lamont... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
110. I doubt that would make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 02:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
126. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:38 AM Response to Reply #126 |
157. You're defending the Democratic leadership for sabotaging a Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:03 AM Response to Reply #157 |
159. I'm not defending it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 01:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
152. Because Reid will want him on his side when Lieberman wins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
8. They luv dead hand Joe I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
10. What happened to all the grassroots efforts for lamont? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
128. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. Dean's rallying with Ned today, and there's a good ad out with Dodd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
13. How can this be...what is wrong with CT., the war is going real bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I don't think it's the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flanker
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. The problem is that there are tons of Democrats more Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
42. CT has tons of rich Democrats, that's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Iraq is NOT the only issue, but it's what grassroots insisted on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
62. Yup. Plus, the average Connecticut voter probably isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
105. Ned talked about a lot of other issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #105 |
169. That poster called the war a "hobbyhorse" for activists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:42 AM Response to Reply #28 |
158. Will you stop bashing the grassroots already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
123. It's called incumbancy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
15. Connectificut... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
33. CT HAS OLD LEVER MACHINES..NOTNEW DRE'S...N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. they have to start fighting like JOE is the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
President Jesus
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
17. a serious reality check to the "Netroots" crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. Only if DEMS start ignoring the primary results and go for GOP votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
127. The "Netroots" crowd needs a reality enema. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #127 |
134. You're saying we should have given up on stopping the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. How does the current outcome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. There was no way to predict this outcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. Yes there was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #142 |
170. None of you KNEW he'd lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
19. The good part is we will still have the same old Lieberman... but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. not sure about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. He may remain a nominal Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. The poll is inaccurate. He doesn't have a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 11:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Not a single poll in months has come out showing Lamont ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Maybe, but they were getting close. What triggered 17 points surge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
49. I don't see how it was ever close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
60. If the vote was to take place on DU, then he wouldn't have a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
31. What's sad is this.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
80. they have a law stating exactly your wishes. they chose not to follow it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
101. good points n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
32. This is a set up for a rigged election!!! Watch and see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. He's made a campaign pledge to caucus with Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac56
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Since when do you believe anything he says? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. It's a matter of legal precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:32 AM Response to Reply #50 |
117. Since when has Joementum kept his word? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
98geoduck
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #117 |
130. Start with Big Pharm, Insurance Companies, and Defense industries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. Of course he'll be loyal to Big Biz! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Yeah on those Diebold lever machines! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. THANK YOU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. I hold out hope but geez sometimes the foil is wrapped too tight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanusAscending
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 06:11 PM Original message |
Get a Clue!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Most definitely! These polls are fixed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. Provide a poll that doesn't show a Lieberman lead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Zogby shows 49-43%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Two things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingWhisper
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:00 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. You're my hero Virginian, way to present facts, not emotion! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:19 PM Response to Reply #63 |
95. Joe lost the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #95 |
125. Which proves what, exactly? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Only ONE poll showed Lieberman losing the Dem. primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:18 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Deleted sub-thread |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. No, but most polls consistently show a lead of at least 8-10 points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. It took me 5 minutes to find 6 polls that show it within MOE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Look at the most recent polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. This poll still doesn't factor in the stream of bad news for Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. 1/3 of respondents watched the first debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. What about Debate #2? You still haven't addressed that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:42 AM Response to Reply #65 |
112. Maybe you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:15 PM Response to Reply #112 |
171. Why do some of you keep saying that? HE'S RUN ON MORE THAN THE WAR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 10:37 PM Response to Reply #171 |
175. I don't feel it is - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #175 |
181. Okay, cool, thanks for clarifying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
96. Here's some info... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #96 |
103. You're right, there IS bias - the first line of the article reveals it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:41 AM Response to Reply #56 |
118. I hope you're happy. The traitor gets to stay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. I am sure he will provide the proof on election day . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ldf
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
99. what if this is the first of the gop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #99 |
177. so do you all of the polls are fraudulent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
124. That's idiotic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
34. 881 voters polled ...IS NO POLL!!! This is pathetic this day and age!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #34 |
52. You don't know anything about polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
35. If Lieberman wins, he could be our new Zell Miller. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greccogirl
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #35 |
113. He already is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. check out the inner polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
44. Well, Liebermworm got himself reelected in the most sleazy way possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingWhisper
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
61. Don't understand why he's sleazy, simply because he chose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:00 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. He used the Dem. party's money for his Independent run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac56
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. "Holds himself to the fire"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
against all enemies
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. Maybe you didn't see him defend Bush on the Wall Strreet Journal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 10:10 AM Response to Reply #69 |
165. Deleted message |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 07:58 PM Response to Reply #61 |
93. why is it sleazy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:36 PM Response to Reply #61 |
100. Advocating for lieberman is against DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:23 PM Response to Reply #61 |
104. Puleeze.....how can anyone defend that traitorous douchebag? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:52 AM Response to Reply #61 |
119. Because of his choices he is a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #61 |
131. First - it's against the rules to support the LOSER of the DEMOCRATIC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. Remember, only ONE poll showed Lamont winning Dem. primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #58 |
120. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
76. Deleted message |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #76 |
139. And what the fuck is that supposed to mean? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 10:12 AM Response to Reply #139 |
166. I somehow doubt we'll get an explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
81. Not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
83. Too much poison... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 06:49 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Lieberman supports torture and the repeal of habeas corpus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 06:52 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. I'll always consider Lieberman a traitor, I can't stand him. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. Terri Schaivo. Contraception for raped women. Censorship. The list goes on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
94. Lamont is the Democrat in the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 10:51 PM Response to Reply #94 |
148. Yes, voters have to be reminded that Lamont is the Democratic candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 10:32 AM Response to Reply #148 |
178. Lamont will be listed as a Democrat on the ballot: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Polesitter
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
98. I'm conflicted over this race. While Lamont won the primary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat
![]() |
Fri Oct-20-06 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
102. You Got anymore "good" news Robcon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 06:36 AM Response to Reply #102 |
116. Another Repig endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chomskyite
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
114. Has Lamont bothered to mention . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 05:27 PM Response to Reply #114 |
135. No, and it happens to be untrue anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:27 PM Response to Reply #114 |
138. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
122. who is this 36% of Democrats who back Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #122 |
141. Probably about 2/3 of those who voted for him in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #141 |
172. But far more among conservatives, aka the uninformed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
145. Past time to redirect our efforts elsewhere. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
146. damn it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plasticsundance
![]() |
Sat Oct-21-06 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
149. Ah ... so the United States is going for Joementum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
98geoduck
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
150. great article in The Nation by Bruce Shapiro regarding ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:36 AM Response to Reply #150 |
155. Joe's money comes from Repubs and Whitehouse allies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #150 |
173. Look in my sigline for who else is funding Jihad Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
153. The lead may be exagerrated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kohodog
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
162. LIE: ""Candidate debates this week did not help the two principal chall.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
98geoduck
![]() |
Sun Oct-22-06 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
168. "Both Lamont and Schlesinger questioned the validity of the poll results." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
176. Another poll in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheVirginian
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #176 |
179. I think everyone can accept 17 points as high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
98geoduck
![]() |
Mon Oct-23-06 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
180. Lamont IS going to WIN and HERE is WHY.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC